How Charles Koch Is Buying Credibility With Academic Investments

authordefault
on

In 1996, Richard Fink, an executive at Koch Industries and a top advisor to Charles Koch, outlined a three-tiered strategy for getting the petrochemical industrialist’s free-market ideas out intoย the world: through academia, think tanks, and activistsโ€™ organizations. Fink described the first tier of this โ€œstructure of social changeโ€ strategy as โ€œinvestment in intellectual raw materialsโ€ and the โ€œexploration and production of abstract concepts and theoriesโ€ that academia wouldย develop.ย 

Nearly two and a half decades later, Koch influence in the academic sphere is far ranging. Koch money fundsย individual courses, professorships, fellowships, and even energy research and policy programs, like the Mercatus Center at George Mason University and the Center for Growth and Opportunity at Utah State University. These centers represent significant investments in the โ€œintellectual raw materialsโ€ of free-marketย advocacy.

According to Samantha Parsons of UnKoch My Campus, a group working to remove the Koch influence in higher education,ย there are at least 40 centers at prominent American colleges and universities that are funded directly by the Koch donor network. Three of the most prominent examples are describedย below.ย 

George Mason University: The Epicenter of Koch Academicย Influence

Billionaire Charles Koch has focused more resources onย George Mason University (GMU) than any other school, and the relationship goes back decades. As far back as 1990, entities controlled by Charles and David Koch were given posts on a committee to choose candidates for a professorial position. An analysis of tax records by the Associated Press discovered that between 2011 and 2014, the Charles Koch Foundation gave $48 million to GMU, and then a subsequent $10 million donation in 2016 to rename their law school after conservative Supreme Court justice Antoninย Scalia.

According to Parsons of UnKoch My Campus, an economics professor had used a textbook called Global Warming and other Eco Myths,ย telling students that if they wanted to debate climate change, they should leave and not comeย back.

Another GMU professor, Walter Williams, stated in 2014 that it would take โ€œidiocyโ€ to believe that man made climate change could overpower the forces of nature, according to a Greenpeace report. Williams also mentored Nancy Pfotenhauer, a former lobbyist for Koch Industries who served as the first president forย the Koch-funded groupย Americans For Prosperity. Williams has written for Fox Business, denouncing โ€œwild predictions about climate doomโ€ and asserting that after investingย in fighting climate change, โ€œweโ€™ll be much poorer and less free.โ€ And in an articleย for the Deseret News,ย he wrote thatย โ€œman-made global warming, for many, is an Earth-worshippingย religion.โ€ย 

Thatโ€™s just in the economics department. George Mason University also hosts the Mercatus Center, a conservative public policy think tank, which has routinely opposed attempts to control greenhouse gas emissions and was established by Charles Koch and Richard Fink. The Institute of Humane Studies, once described by Mother Jones as โ€œa haven for climate change deniers,โ€ is also a fixture of GMU. It is chaired by Charles Koch.ย 

Utah State University: Blurring Private Enterprise With Publicย Education

In May 2017, the Charles Koch Foundation announced plans to donate $25 million to Utah State University. The primary purpose of this donation was to establish the Center for Growth and Opportunity, whose faculty have supported the privatization of public lands and environmental deregulation. Researchers at UnKoch My Campus and the Center for Biological Diversity discovered that the Center for Growth and Opportunityย would have the veto authority over the hiring of sixย new facultyย members.

The influence of Koch funding atย Utah State is clear. Strata Policy, a Koch-funded think tank, has published research that overlaps with those of academics at Utah State, and the center and Strata share some personnel. Strataโ€™s own press releases have acknowledged the symbiotic connection between the twoย institutions.


Screenshot from a Strata pressย release

A few examples illustrate the symbiosis; none better than that of Randyย Simmons.

Simmons is a faculty member at Utah State University, the executive directorย of the university’sย Institute for Political Economy (IPE), and also the president of Strata. Simmons publicly denies Koch involvement in the affairs of Utah State, but IPE, the free-marketย center housed at the university,ย is intimately connected with Strata.ย For example, the professors who wrote a 2015 Strata reportย opposing renewable energy in Kansas were the same voices behind a 2016 report opposing renewable energy policy inย Pennsylvania.

The 2016 Pennsylvania report, co-authored by Simmons, argued that Renewable Portfolio Standardsย in Pennsylvania were โ€œcounterproductive and contradictoryโ€ and that states adopting these standards for minimum levels of renewable powerย saw a 14 percent drop in electricity sales.ย Strata and IPE have collaborated extensively since, as in 2017, they launched a failed attempt to revoke North Carolinaโ€™s renewable energy policy. This example indicates the reach of Koch funding on a state level, and in important debates about the future of environmental policy. It suggests academia can provideย a veneer of expertise that allows the vested interests of industrialists and fossil fuel magnates to masquerade as evidence-based conclusions, in line with Fink’s โ€œsocial changeโ€ย strategy.

In another instance in 2015, Strata won a contract to promote the โ€œTransfer of Public lands Act,โ€ an attempt to privatize Utahโ€™s public land. This bill was originally co-sponsored by then-Representative David Butterfield, who was also on the board ofย Strata.ย 

Dr. Michael Giberson, currently Associate Professor in the area of Energy, Commerce and Business at Texas Tech University, has collaborated extensively with Stata. Heย authored a 2019 study entitled,ย โ€œThe Consumerโ€™s Interest in Reforming West Virginiaโ€™s Power Industry,โ€ย which advocated for the deregulation of West Virginiaโ€™s power system. Before working at Texas Tech, Giberson was employed at GMU‘sย Interdisciplinary Center for Economicย Science.

The Institute for Energy Research (IER) commissioned a 2013ย study Giberson co-authored, โ€œAssessing Wind Power Cost Estimates,โ€ in which heย denounced clean energy and alternatives to fossil fuels as costly and unworkable, claiming that subsidizing wind power shifts costs onto the taxpayer, paying for turbines outside the states where they live. Giberson assertedย that the low prices of renewable energy mean that smaller providers are unable to turn a profit, meaning that only those providers who qualify for subsidies are viable. IER, which puts out reports and analysis critiquing renewable energy and emissionsย reductions,ย is a nonprofit whose predecessor organization had direct ties toย Charles Koch.ย Today the group has received hundreds of thousands of dollars in funding from Koch familyย foundations.

George Washington University and the Regulatory Studiesย Center

Another organization with significant Koch ties is George Washington University and its Regulatory Studies Center (RSC). Despite claiming to be an unbiased and objective analyst of regulatory policy, an evaluation of the center’s public output revealsย almost unanimousย support of deregulation. For example, between 2013 and 2018, 96 percentย of public comments submitted to government agencies by RSC writers recommended less regulation than currently existed, according to an analysis by consumer advocacy nonprofitย Public Citizen and UnKoch My Campus. Additionally, 75 percentย of public comments submitted by the RSC in this period were written by authors with past or present connections to Koch foundations, including director Susan Dudley.

Aside from Koch foundations, GWUโ€™s Regulatory Studies Center has accepted funds from oil companies, lawyers, and anti-regulatory strategists to advocate for limited government. Susan Dudley is a self-proclaimed โ€œfree market environmentalist,โ€ย having argued that smog should be valued, as it could blot out the sun and mitigate the effects of skinย cancer.

RSC authors with past or present Koch ties have been affiliated with at least 28 Koch-funded organizations, including the Mercatus Center at GMU. Both the Charles Koch Foundation and the libertarian Searle Freedom Trust Foundation, as well as the Exxon Mobil Foundation, have each donated over $1 million to the RSC. This led Taylor Lincoln, author of a Public Citizen report which accused the center of right-wing bias and the deliberate promotion of a deregulatory agenda, to describe the RSC as โ€œthe Fox News of the regulatory policy world, except it still clings to the fiction that it is fair andย balanced.โ€

This level of Koch funding in academia and think tanks has broaderย implications for policy implementation, as state governments routinely rely on the state university systems to provide independent analyses of issues before the legislature and agencies, and advocacy groups use academic findings to bolster lobbying and publicย campaigns.

And as Fink laid outย nearly 25 years ago, these investments in academia are the foundation for society-wide structuralย change.ย 

Main image: Utah State University students project message on side of business school building. Credit: UnKoch Myย Campus.ย 

authordefault
Tom Perrett is a researcher at DeSmog who focuses on documenting climate change misinformation.

Related Posts

on

Lord Frost is one of several departures from the Global Warming Policy Foundation, which has links to Tory leader Kemi Badenoch.

Lord Frost is one of several departures from the Global Warming Policy Foundation, which has links to Tory leader Kemi Badenoch.
on

Trumpโ€™s nominees are backed by major players in the world of climate obstruction โ€“ from Project 2025 and Koch network fixtures to oil-soaked Christian nationalists.

Trumpโ€™s nominees are backed by major players in the world of climate obstruction โ€“ from Project 2025 and Koch network fixtures to oil-soaked Christian nationalists.
Analysis
on

The Conservative leader, who attacked โ€œradical green absolutismโ€ in a Washington DC speech, recently met with a host of influential anti-climate figures.

The Conservative leader, who attacked โ€œradical green absolutismโ€ in a Washington DC speech, recently met with a host of influential anti-climate figures.
on

New documents show close coordination between the oil major and a coalition of free-market think tanks at a crucial moment in climate diplomacy.

New documents show close coordination between the oil major and a coalition of free-market think tanks at a crucial moment in climate diplomacy.