Climate Deniers on Front Line of Battle Over Pennsylvania Joining Cap-and-Trade Program to Slash Carbon Pollution

image_50427649
on

Pennsylvania, traditionally a battleground state in electoral politics, is currently embroiled in a battle over the state potentially joining a regional program to curb carbon pollution from the power sector. That program, called the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI), has seen carbon dioxide emissions from power plants slashed by 47 percent over 10ย years while generating over $3 billion in revenue. Participating states have then used that revenueย to invest in energy efficiency and clean energyย programs.

Environmental advocates say Pennsylvaniaโ€™s participation in RGGI would be a โ€œgame-changer,โ€ but climate science deniers and other fossil fuel alliesย claim it would be too costly and kill jobs in a state where the coal and fracked gas industries have long dominated the energyย landscape.

The stateโ€™s government is divided on the issue of Pennsylvania joining RGGI. Governor Tom Wolf, a Democrat, issued an executive order last October directing the stateโ€™s Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) to begin the process of joining the regional cap-and-trade program and develop carbon pollution regulations within the state. The Republican-controlled legislature opposes Pennsylvania participating in RGGI and has held a series of hearings to argue against the governorโ€™s initiative to join the program. The Pennsylvania House of Representatives even passed a bill (House Bill 2025) in July that would strip DEPโ€™s authority to regulate power-sector carbonย pollution.

Environmental committees in the state legislature held a pair of hearings this week, one in the House and one in the Senate, featuring witnesses opposed to Pennsylvania joining RGGI. One invited witness in the House hearing on Monday, August 24 โ€” the CO2 Coalitionโ€™s Caleb Rossiter โ€” broke with the more thanย 11,000 scientists who last year declared the planet โ€œis facing a climate emergencyโ€ย when heย falsely claimed, โ€œWe are not in a CO2-driven climateย crisis.โ€

Rossiter,ย a professor and consultant with a background in international policy,ย also said the stateโ€™s DEP โ€œtraffics in lies, damn lies, statistics โ€ฆ and models.โ€ Last year, aย studyย byย climate scientists published in the peer-reviewed journal Geophysical Research Letters concluded that โ€œclimate models published over the past five decades were generally quite accurate in predicting globalย warming.โ€

Appearances by outright climate science deniersย like Rossiter โ€”ย those who disputeย the scientific consensus on climate change โ€” are relatively rare these days in legislative bodies, but Pennsylvania Republicans are buckingย that trend. Marc Morano of the climate denial website Climate Depot, for example, testified in late October last year before the House Environmental Resources and Energy Committee, the same committee to which Rossiter spokeย this week. The Republican chair of that committee, Rep. Daryl Metcalfe, is a climate science denier himself andย has previously held hearings disputing mainstream climate science, saying its proponents engage inย โ€œChicken Littleย fear-mongering.โ€

The CO2 Coalition has received funding from the petrochemical billionaire Koch family and others in theย oil and gas industry, whileย Climate Depot is a project of the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT), a conservative think tank where Morano also works as communications director and whichย has received funding from ExxonMobil andย Chevron.

These hearings featuring testimony from fossil fuel allies and climate science deniers misrepresent the climate challenge confronting Pennsylvania, one environmental advocate told DeSmog. โ€œThere is a lot of misinformation and cherry-picked stats from folks who are ideologically opposed to the idea of controlling carbon pollution,โ€ said Robert Routh, staff attorney at the Clean Air Council, a Pennsylvania-based environmental advocacyย group.

Mondayโ€™s hearing before Rep. Metcalfeโ€™s committee, he explained, was part of a series of actions to try to โ€œdelegitimize Pennsylvaniaโ€™s participation in RGGI.โ€ Witnesses in other anti-RGGI hearings in the state legislature have included union workers and representatives from conservative think tanks and the coalย industry.

History of Koch-Funded Attacks on RGGI

Fossil fuelโ€“funded organizations have a history of opposing the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, which started in 2009 with 10ย participating states in the Northeast and mid-Atlantic. In 2010, the Koch-funded group Americans for Prosperity reportedly planned to protest RGGI at the first auctioning event, where carbon allowances would beย sold.

In addition, Greenpeace Investigations revealed that Koch-funded groups heavily influenced New Jerseyโ€™s 2011 exit from the RGGI program under former Republican Governor Chris Christie. The โ€œcorporate bill millโ€ theย American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC),ย along with Americans for Prosperity and another Koch surrogate called the Franklin Center for Government and Public Integrity, worked to attack RGGI and pressure Gov. Christie to oppose theย program.ย 

In 2013 Beacon Hill Institute, a Boston-based conservative think tank and associate member of the Koch-backed State Policy Network, aimed to produce research on the economic impact of RGGI with pre-determined conclusions intended to โ€œarm opponents of cap-and-trade with data for their arguments, and to weaken or destroy [RGGI],โ€ the Guardian reported. The instituteย submitted a funding proposal for that research without approval from Suffolk University, where the think tank was housed at the time. According to that funding proposal, โ€œSuccess will take the form of media recognition, dissemination to stakeholders, and legislative activity that will pare back or repeal RGGI.โ€ Beacon Hill Institute submitted the proposal to the Searle Freedom Trust, which funds right-wing, Koch-associated groups like ALEC and Americans forย Prosperity.

Coal Decliningย But Will Gasย Dominate?

Coal still accounts for roughly one-fifth of Pennsylvaniaโ€™s electricity generation, and the state has the fifth highest greenhouse gas emissions nationally. But overall, coal use is declining across the state, with the share of electricity generated from coal falling by more than half from 2010 to 2018,ย according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. The fracked gas boom in Pennsylvania is a key factor in the decline ofย coal.

This trend of gas replacing coal will continue regardless of what Pennsylvania does with respect to RGGI, Routh explained. Where a climate policy like RGGI would make a difference is reducing the role of gas in the stateโ€™s electricity portfolio in favor of carbon-free energy like nuclear as well as wind and solar, he says. Nuclear currently provides roughly 40 percent of the stateโ€™s electric power. If Pennsylvania doesnโ€™t join RGGI, the stateโ€™s energy portfolio would likely be โ€œdominated and monopolized by natural gasโ€ over the next decade, Routh toldย DeSmog.

The petroleum industry and its allies have a vested financial interest in making that outcome a reality, which explains why there is such fervor from fossil fuel-backed Pennsylvania politicians to try to prevent the state from joining the RGGI program. They are inviting climate science deniers to testify and ignoring the clear scientific evidence that fossil fuels are driving a climateย emergency.

โ€œThe time for climate deniers posturing in the General Assembly is long past,โ€ Jackson Morris, Director of Eastern Climate and Clean Energy at Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), said in a statement last month. โ€œThe climate crisis is already endangering the health and safety of Pennsylvanians, from excessive heat to harmful air pollution. The only way to change the stateโ€™s trajectory is for lawmakers to swiftly ramp up aggressive climateย action.โ€

Main image: Bruce Mansfield coal power plant (now closed) with nuclear reactors in Beaver County, Pennsylvania. Credit: Drums600, CC BYSAย 4.0

image_50427649
Dana is an environmental journalist focusing on climate change and climate accountability reporting. She writes regularly for DeSmog covering topics such as fossil fuel industry opposition to climate action, climate change lawsuits, greenwashing and false climate solutions, and clean transportation.

Related Posts

on

Immad Ahmed explains how "human-centered design" is helping displaced people in South Sudan and Bangladesh overcome daunting odds.

Immad Ahmed explains how "human-centered design" is helping displaced people in South Sudan and Bangladesh overcome daunting odds.
on

Oil and gas majors are splashing the cash in order to have a presence at the flagship climate talks in Azerbaijan.

Oil and gas majors are splashing the cash in order to have a presence at the flagship climate talks in Azerbaijan.
Analysis
on

The flagship summit is at risk of turning into a tool for authoritarian petrostates.

The flagship summit is at risk of turning into a tool for authoritarian petrostates.
on

New documents show how a deceptive PR strategy pioneered in 1950s California first exposed the risk of climate change and then helped the industry deny it.

New documents show how a deceptive PR strategy pioneered in 1950s California first exposed the risk of climate change and then helped the industry deny it.