Fossil Fuel Industry Engaging in 'Pervasive Fraud' that Threatens Global Economy, Report Warns

image_50427649
on

Warning of an impending financial implosion driven largely by fossil fuel industry deception, a recent report calls on fossil fuel insiders and other potential whistleblowers to help expose and prosecute thisย fraud.

According to this new report from the National Whistleblower Center (NWC) published July 23, fossil fuel executivesโ€™ deception on the financial risks of climate changeโ€”to their business and the economy at largeโ€”is widespread and is likely actionable fraud, meaning that further securities fraud lawsuits against companies like ExxonMobil should be expected particularly if whistleblowers come forward to work with financial regulators andย prosecutors.

โ€œIn light of the deceptions we found, the handful of pending fraud cases challenging climate risk disclosures by fossil fuel companies are probably just the tip of the iceberg,โ€ said John Kostyack, NWC Executive Director and lead author of the report, titled Exposing a Ticking Time Bomb: How Fossil Fuel Industry Fraud is Setting Us Up for a Financial Implosion โ€“ and What Whistleblowers Can Do About It. โ€œWe anticipate that the number of cases and defendants will increase dramatically in the near future once potential whistleblowers learn about the benefits of modern whistleblower laws and begin providing information to regulators and prosecutors about climate risk deceptions along the lines of those outlined in ourย report.โ€

Climate risks include physical risks from climate-related damage to property and infrastructure, as well as transition risks as the world moves away from fossil fuels. Both types of risk โ€œuniquely threaten the finances of fossil fuel companies,โ€ according to the report, and these companies โ€œare therefore highly motivated to conceal their exposure to these risks.โ€ Investors and the larger economy that are deeply intertwined with the fossil fuel sector face serious harm when these climate risks are not disclosed, the reportย argues.ย 

There is currently no standardized framework or law requiring corporate climate risk disclosure in the United States. Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) has introduced a bill that addresses this gap, and has urged federal financial regulators to mandate climate risk disclosure from public companies. Large investors managing almost $1 trillion in assets (such as pension funds) recently sent a letter to the Federal Reserve, the Securities and Exchange Commission, and other financial regulators warning that the climate crisis is a systemic threat to the economy and calling for mandatory climate riskย disclosures.

In March the Senate Democratsโ€™ Special Committee on the Climate Crisis held a hearing where economic experts warned of a potential financial crisis similar to the 2008 economic crash, but this time brought on by the climate crisis. And in June over 60 central banks around the world warned that global GDP could drop by 25 percent by the end of the century without urgent action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions that cause climateย change.

Since those emissions come mainly from fossil fuels, companies in the business of powering the economy with oil, gas and coal face an existential threat as society transitions away from these fuels to clean energy, a shift that science says is necessary to mitigate the climate crisis. As the National Whistleblower Center report explains, โ€œfailure by companies holding significant fossil fuel assets to participate in the โ€˜energy transitionโ€™ could leave the energy sector with billions of dollars in stranded assets and, given the risks of sudden and massive deflation of assets, pose a severe threat to the worldโ€™s financialย system.โ€

Besides stranded assets, other risks that many fossil fuel companies fail to disclose, as identified in the report, include: fossil fuel companiesโ€™ vulnerability to competition from alternative energy; justifications for what may be overinflated or optimistic pricing and demand assumptions for their products; their lack of clear and proven strategies for reducing carbon emissions; potential environmental liabilities including potential payments for climate damages; vulnerability of their infrastructure to climate-related disasters, and larger systemic risks to the global economy stemming from climateย change.

More Climate-Related Fraudย Lawsuits?

The National Whistleblower Center report points to a need for โ€œgreater accountability in the fossil fuel industryโ€ and discusses several lawsuits seeking to hold companies like ExxonMobil accountable for alleged fraud, or deceiving investors and consumers on the risks of climateย change.

One high-profile securities fraud lawsuit filed by the New York attorney general against Exxon went to trial in October 2019 and resulted in a ruling that Exxon did not mislead investors on its climate accounting methods. That decision focused on a narrow issue, with the judge emphasizing in his order, โ€œNothing in this opinion is intended to absolve Exxon Mobil from responsibility for contributing to climate change in the production of its fossil fuelย products.โ€

While Exxon was on trial in New York, the attorney general of Massachusetts sued the company claiming it misled Massachusettsโ€™ investors and consumers in violation of the stateโ€™s consumer protection statute. As the NWC report notes, it is the โ€œfirst legal action to address a failure to disclose systemic risk,โ€ since the complaint (amended in June 2020) accuses Exxon not only of deceiving investors and consumers on climate risks to the companyโ€™s business but of failing to grapple with the impacts of climate change on the larger economy and world financialย markets.

โ€œThe climate risk fraud case filed by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts against Exxon in 2019 is significant because it alleges misleading statements and omissions by Exxon about climate risk that we find are pervasive in the industry,โ€ the report states. โ€œSimilar cases against Exxon have been brought by shareholders in federal courts in Texas and New Jersey and by a group of whistleblowers in a petition to the SEC.โ€

And these cases โ€œare likely just the tip of the iceberg,โ€ the report says, with the โ€œnumber of cases and defendantsโ€ expected to proliferate with assistance from potentialย whistleblowers.

โ€œWhistleblowers have played a critical role in reining in fraud in industries ranging from tobacco to banking to health care,โ€ the report explains. โ€œLessons from those industries must now be harvested so that a new generation of whistleblowing can begin in the fossil fuelย industry.โ€ย 

Main Image Credit: Penn State via Flickr, CC BYNCNDย 2.0

image_50427649
Dana is an environmental journalist focusing on climate change and climate accountability reporting. She writes regularly for DeSmog covering topics such as fossil fuel industry opposition to climate action, climate change lawsuits, greenwashing and false climate solutions, and clean transportation.

Related Posts

Analysis
on

The celebrity investor pitched โ€˜Wonder Valleyโ€™ with no committed investors, no Indigenous partnership, and about 27 megatonnes of projected annual emissions.

The celebrity investor pitched โ€˜Wonder Valleyโ€™ with no committed investors, no Indigenous partnership, and about 27 megatonnes of projected annual emissions.
on

City Council OKs private equity firmโ€™s purchase of Entergy gas utility, undermining climate goals and jacking up prices for the cityโ€™s poorest.

City Council OKs private equity firmโ€™s purchase of Entergy gas utility, undermining climate goals and jacking up prices for the cityโ€™s poorest.
on

With LNG export terminals already authorized to ship nearly half of U.S. natural gas abroad, DOE warns build-out would inflate utility bills nationwide.

With LNG export terminals already authorized to ship nearly half of U.S. natural gas abroad, DOE warns build-out would inflate utility bills nationwide.
Analysis
on

We reflect on a year of agenda-setting stories that charted the political influence of fossil fuel interests in the UK and beyond.

We reflect on a year of agenda-setting stories that charted the political influence of fossil fuel interests in the UK and beyond.