Court Rules Bayou Bridge Pipeline 'Trampled' Rights of Louisiana Landowners

image_50427649
on

A Louisiana state appeals court has ruled that the Bayou Bridge Pipeline Company illegally โ€œtrampledโ€ on the rights of landowners by starting pipeline construction without the landownersโ€™ permission. The pipeline company must pay the landowners $10,000 each plus attorneysย fees.

โ€œThis is a victory not only for us but for all landowners,โ€ said Theda Larson Wright, one of the three Louisiana landowners who sued Bayou Bridge Pipeline Company (BBP) in September 2018. โ€œAll over the country, pipeline companies have destroyed people’s land, often without even attempting to get permission, and dared the landowners to speak up. Well, we did. I hope this victory will encourage many others to asย well.โ€

Theย Bayou Bridge pipeline is a 163-mile pipeline through southern Louisiana carrying North Dakota crude oil to the Gulf Coast. It is the tail end of a pipeline network including the Dakota Access pipeline and is a joint venture of Energy Transfer and Phillips 66. The Bayou Bridge pipeline traverses ecologically sensitive areas such as the Atchafalaya Basin, the countryโ€™s largest river swamp, which containsย old growth trees and many endangeredย species.

BBP started construction, including bulldozing and clearing trees, in the Atchafalaya Basin on privately owned land without notifying landowners or obtaining legal rights to seize the land through what is called eminent domain. Only when property owners sued for trespassingย did BBP begin the eminent domain proceeding. In December 2018 the trial court found BBP had trespassed but ordered a small fine of only $450 total for all landowners, while upholding BBPโ€™s expropriation or taking of the land under eminent domain. The landowners brought an appeal in Septemberย 2019.

The Louisiana Third Circuit Court of Appeal heard oral arguments on January 8 of this year. That court ruled on July 16 that BBP not only trespassed, but explicitly violated constitutionally protected propertyย rights.

โ€œWhen BBP consciously ordered construction to begin on this property prior to obtaining a judicial determination of the public and necessary purpose for that taking, it not only trampled Defendantsโ€™ due process rights as landowners, it eviscerated the constitutional protections laid out to specifically protect those property rights,โ€ the appeals court wrote in its decision.

The court awarded each of the three landowners $10,000 plus legal fees. The court did not rule against BBPโ€™s seizure of the land under eminent domain, however.ย ย ย 

โ€œThe rights of landowners are important, so I applaud this ruling,โ€ Katherine Aaslestad, one of the three landowners involved in the case, said. โ€œBut this is also about the abuse of eminent domain by private companies, and we need to keep our attention onย that.โ€

The Aaslestads in front of a hotel the night after a December 2018 court decision
Siblings and plaintiffs Peter and Katherine Aaslestadย in front of a hotel the night after a December 2018 courtย decision.ย 

Pam Spees, senior staff attorney at the Center for Constitutional Rights and one of the attorneys for the landowners, said the appeals courtโ€™s decision sends a message to companies deciding to break the law on propertyย rights.

โ€œThe courtโ€™s decision rightly takes BBP to task for its blatant disregard and abuse of the law and landowners in Louisiana,โ€ she said. โ€œBBP made a calculated decision that violating the law was cheaper than following it, and the lower courtโ€™s ruling let them get away with it. This decision is an important reminder to companies like BBP, and more importantly to small landowners, that these rights meanย something.โ€

Alexis Daniel, a spokesperson for Energy Transfer, told Courthouse Newsย the company does not comment on pending litigation. โ€œWe are proud of this project, which has been safely operating since March of 2019,โ€ย Danielย said.

Main image: Dean Wilson, executive director of theย Atchafalaya Basinkeeper, on the plaintiffsโ€™ย land in the basin.ย Credit: All photos by Julie Dermansky forย DeSmog

image_50427649
Dana is an environmental journalist focusing on climate change and climate accountability reporting. She writes regularly for DeSmog covering topics such as fossil fuel industry opposition to climate action, climate change lawsuits, greenwashing and false climate solutions, and clean transportation.

Related Posts

Analysis
on

The celebrity investor pitched โ€˜Wonder Valleyโ€™ with no committed investors, no Indigenous partnership, and about 27 megatonnes of projected annual emissions.

The celebrity investor pitched โ€˜Wonder Valleyโ€™ with no committed investors, no Indigenous partnership, and about 27 megatonnes of projected annual emissions.
on

City Council OKs private equity firmโ€™s purchase of Entergy gas utility, undermining climate goals and jacking up prices for the cityโ€™s poorest.

City Council OKs private equity firmโ€™s purchase of Entergy gas utility, undermining climate goals and jacking up prices for the cityโ€™s poorest.
on

With LNG export terminals already authorized to ship nearly half of U.S. natural gas abroad, DOE warns build-out would inflate utility bills nationwide.

With LNG export terminals already authorized to ship nearly half of U.S. natural gas abroad, DOE warns build-out would inflate utility bills nationwide.
Analysis
on

We reflect on a year of agenda-setting stories that charted the political influence of fossil fuel interests in the UK and beyond.

We reflect on a year of agenda-setting stories that charted the political influence of fossil fuel interests in the UK and beyond.