House Democrats Highlight Impacts of Trump Admin's Favors for Fossil Fuels During Pandemic

image_50427649
on

On Tuesday, May 5,ย several Democratic members of the House Natural Resources Committee hostedย a virtual discussionย calling out how farย the Trump administration has gone toย caterย to fossil fuel interests during the COVID-19 crisis and how that favoritism affects averageย Americans.ย 

Theย discussion, titled โ€œBehind the Curtain: The Trump Administration’s Fossil Fuel Agenda During the Pandemic,โ€ was part of an ongoing series of live-streamed forums hosted by the Committee on coronavirus impacts on at-risk populations. The conversation, which included several guest speakers,ย highlighted how vulnerable communities are hit with the simultaneous impactsย ofย the virus, industrial pollution, and the climate crisis. In addition, the discussion voiced concerns over the wayย federal agencies have beenย bestowing favors upon fossil fuel corporations while restricting public input.ย ย 

For both theย coronavirus and climate crises, the Trump administration has ignored scientific expertise and promotedย misinformation. โ€œThe parallels have become quite stark and quite frightening,โ€ said Dr. Kim Cobb, a climate scientist and professor at the Georgia Institute ofย Technology.

In each case, President Trumpโ€™s disregard for science has had dangerous and deadly consequences, the speakers concluded. Dire warnings aboutย the virusย from health experts, and many of their subsequent recommendations,ย have gone unheeded, and as Cobb explained, โ€œthe most vulnerable communities are paying the steepest price, especially low-income communities of color.โ€ In her home state of Georgia, for example, African Americans represent roughly one-thirdย of the population yet they comprised half of COVID-19ย deaths.

Similarly, she noted that the Trump administration has turned a blind eye to climate science and these same communities will end up suffering the most. โ€œThere is no doubt that the most vulnerable among us will bear the brunt of the losses from climate change,โ€ Cobbย said.

Lower-income and communities of color also experience higher exposure to toxic pollution and, as โ€œCancer Alleyโ€ communities in Louisiana fear,ย mayย shoulderย the consequences of a recent Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) policy letting the oil, gas, and petrochemical industriesย off the hook for environmental reporting and monitoring requirements during the pandemic.ย ย 

โ€œCOVID-19 has laid bare long-standing and systemic inequities from pollution exposure,โ€ said Sara Imperiale, senior attorney focusing on environmental justice issues with the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC). โ€œEPAโ€™s non-enforcement policy exacerbates the injustices facing these communities made up of people of color, low-income families, and working classย people.โ€

NRDC has sued EPA over this non-enforcement policy after the agency ignored a request that it publicly disclose noncompliance information under theย policy.ย ย 


The Drilled News Climate & COVID-19 Policy Tracker is keeping an eye on climate change-related rollbacks by the Trump administration and state governments amid the coronavirus crisis, along with favors to oil and gas, and other energy and climate-relatedย industries.

Besides leaving Americans more vulnerable to pollution and climate impacts, the Trump administrationโ€™s apparent determination to deliver on the demands of the fossil fuel industry comes at the expense of taxpayers. Kyle Herrig, president of watchdog group Accountable.US, spoke of how fossil fuel companies are already taking advantage of pandemic relief funds. Extractive industries have received over $3.9 billion under the Payroll Protection Program, and heavily indebted fracking companies are receiving a bailout under the Federal Reserveโ€™s Main Street Lendingย Program.

โ€œWhen we see taxpayer dollars going to these corporations, we just see federal government taxpayer dollars flowing to the powerful, and the people getting hurt by this are your average Americans,โ€ Herrigย said.ย 

Another guest speaker called out the Department of the Interior for prioritizing fossil fuel interests through expedited oil and gas leasing and royalty relief programs, despite the industryโ€™s poor financialย performance.

โ€œInteriorโ€™s leadership appears to be plowing forward with plans that will lock in a dirty future even more dependent on the boom-bust cycle of a risky industry,โ€ said Christy Goldfuss, senior vice president in Energy and Environment Policy at the Center for American Progress. She explained that oil and gas companies are cutting production, shedding employees, and withholding investments, in a trend that will likely lead to hundreds ofย bankruptcies.

โ€œWhile Americans are reeling from the pandemic, the Interior Department is doubling down on its foolish energy dominance agenda and locking our nation into decades of fossil fuel pollution that we donโ€™t need and frankly canโ€™t afford,โ€ Goldfussย said.

House Natural Resources Committee virtual discussion on Trump administration's fossil fuel agenda
The speakers in the May 5 discussion hosted by Democratic members of the House Natural Resources Committee.ย Credit: NRDemsย Forum

โ€œMoving aggressively forward with this [fossil fuel-focused] agenda while the publicโ€™s attention has been elsewhere is unconscionable,โ€ Natural Resources Committee member Rep. Alan Lowenthal (D-Calif.)ย said.

Committee Chair Raรบl M. Grijalva (D-Ariz.) echoed this sentiment in his openingย remarks.

โ€œThis administration, with a historic pandemic and crippling economy before it, has found it to be a convenient opportunity to fast-track their dirty energy and anti-environmental agenda,โ€ he said. โ€œIt appears the Trump administration is more concerned with saving the industryโ€™s profits than taking care of the Americanย people.โ€

Main image: President Donald Trump during CPAC 2018. Credit: Zach D. Roberts forย DeSmog

image_50427649
Dana is an environmental journalist focusing on climate change and climate accountability reporting. She writes regularly for DeSmog covering topics such as fossil fuel industry opposition to climate action, climate change lawsuits, greenwashing and false climate solutions, and clean transportation.

Related Posts

on

But experts say these โ€œabusiveโ€ lawsuits, which are designed to demoralize and drain resources from activists, should be fought, not feared.

But experts say these โ€œabusiveโ€ lawsuits, which are designed to demoralize and drain resources from activists, should be fought, not feared.
on

Lord Frost is one of several departures from the Global Warming Policy Foundation, which has links to Tory leader Kemi Badenoch.

Lord Frost is one of several departures from the Global Warming Policy Foundation, which has links to Tory leader Kemi Badenoch.
on

Trumpโ€™s nominees are backed by major players in the world of climate obstruction โ€“ from Project 2025 and Koch network fixtures to oil-soaked Christian nationalists.

Trumpโ€™s nominees are backed by major players in the world of climate obstruction โ€“ from Project 2025 and Koch network fixtures to oil-soaked Christian nationalists.
on

Badenochโ€™s leadership campaign was part-funded by a board member at one of the worldโ€™s largest fossil fuel companies.

Badenochโ€™s leadership campaign was part-funded by a board member at one of the worldโ€™s largest fossil fuel companies.