Court Rules EPA Can't Keep Secret Key Model Used in Clean Car Rule Rollback

image_50427649
on

A federal appeals courtย ruled April 1 that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) had no basis to withhold one key part of a computer model used by the agency to develop its less stringent greenhouse gasย emissionย standards for new vehicles. The ruling came just one day after EPA and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) released a final rule rolling back clean car standards set under the Obamaย administration.

The new Safer Affordable Fuel Efficient (SAFE) Vehicles rule, which requires vehicle fuel economy improvements of 1.5 percent annually rather than 5 percent, is expected to increase air pollution, greenhouse gasย emissions, and consumer fuelย spending.

Several environmental and public interest groups โ€” ardent critics of the laxer standards โ€” submitted formal comments to EPA last year noting that the agency disregarded its own modeling for the rulemaking and refused to publicly disclose information related to that modeling. The Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) and the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) also brought a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against EPA to compel the agency to release the full components of a modeling program called the Optimization Model for Reducing Emissions of Greenhouse Gases from Automobiles (OMEGA). The computerized program forecasts how automakers could comply with certain greenhouse gas emissionย standards.

EPA then released several components but withheld one called the โ€œcore model,โ€ and the district court allowed EPA to keep that component hidden. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals, however, ruled in favor of EDF and NRDC, rejecting EPAโ€™s argument that the core model is โ€œdeliberativeโ€ and thus exempted under FOIA.

โ€œThe core model does not contain or expose the types of internal agency communications that courts typically recognize as posing a risk to the candor of agency discussion such as advice, opinions, or recommendations. Instead, it contains algorithms instructing the model on how to process the input data,โ€ the Second Circuit opinion states.

According to EDF, the full OMEGA model would show that automakers could comply with the Obama-era clean car standards โ€œat a substantially lower cost than alleged by the administration.โ€ EPA disregarded the OMEGA modeling results and relied instead on a different model developed by NHTSA, which produced results that better aligned with the proposed rollbacks, which have now been finalized. The NHTSA model, according to a footnote in the Second Circuit opinion, โ€œwas consistently overestimating compliance costs and not prioritizing cost-effectiveย technologies.โ€

โ€œThe Trump administration has been trying to hide the real impacts of its plan to gut clean car standards,โ€ said Pete Huffman, a lawyer with NRDC. โ€œWith this decision, it will be even more clear to the public how dangerous and harmful to the economy this rollback reallyย is.โ€

Main image:ย EPAย Administrator Andrew Wheeler. Credit:ย U.S.ย Department of Agriculture, by Lance Cheung, public domain.ย 

image_50427649
Dana is an environmental journalist focusing on climate change and climate accountability reporting. She writes regularly for DeSmog covering topics such as fossil fuel industry opposition to climate action, climate change lawsuits, greenwashing and false climate solutions, and clean transportation.

Related Posts

on

The new leader of the opposition has regularly criticised the UKโ€™s green ambitions.

The new leader of the opposition has regularly criticised the UKโ€™s green ambitions.
on

One candidate has sworn off taking money from regulated companies

One candidate has sworn off taking money from regulated companies
Analysis
on

The new Labour government is pledging billions to support projects based on climate-heating natural gas.

The new Labour government is pledging billions to support projects based on climate-heating natural gas.
on

The influential newspaper has repeatedly attacked the governmentโ€™s net zero chief Ed Miliband.

The influential newspaper has repeatedly attacked the governmentโ€™s net zero chief Ed Miliband.