Jordan Cove Backers Double Down on Efforts to Push Project Following Federal Permit Delay

1-DSC09675
on
Coos Bay, Oregon, in 2012. The proposed Jordan Cove LNG export terminal site is in the lower left. Credit:ย RBrittsan,ย CC BY SAย 3.0

Last Thursday, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) took the highly unusual step of declining to move forward on permits for the proposed Jordan Cove LNG export terminal in Coos County, Oregon. If built, the $10 billion Jordan Cove project would become the largest source of global warming pollution in theย state.

FERC commissioners voted 2 to 1 to postpone a decision on federal approvals for the project after a string of permit denials from the state of Oregon. Commissioner Bernard McNamee said he needed an additional week to review the latest denial, issued by the Oregon Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) one day prior to FERCโ€™sย vote.

In their Februaryย 19 letter, sent to Jordan Cove, FERC, the Army Corps of Engineers and others, Oregonโ€™s land conservation officials wrote that approving Jordan Cove would โ€œnegatively impactโ€ resources relied on by the stateโ€™s coastal tourism, fishing, shipping, and other industries, as well as endangered and threatened wildlife, โ€œamong other sectors critical to theย state.โ€

โ€œAfter long deliberation and review of the record before the department, it is clear that there is no reasonable assurance that the proposed project is or will be consistent with the laws, regulations, and policies that continue to maintain the Oregonian way of life,โ€ the LCDC said in a statement announcing its decision. โ€œOverall, the issuance of this decision protects the interests of the State of Oregon and those who call Oregonย home.โ€

Without the stateโ€™s sign off, called a โ€œconsistency certification,โ€ federal agencies including FERC and the Army Corps of Engineers โ€œcannot authorize this project,โ€ the Oregon commissionersย wrote.

The next day, February 20, one Jordan Cove backer abruptly resigned from the stateโ€™s land conservation commission, citing the commissionโ€™s Februaryย 19 letter. Coos County commissioner Melissa Cribbins โ€”ย whose contacts with Jordan Cove backers during the time that the projectโ€™s county-level permits were pending were at the center of a recent DeSmog investigationย โ€”ย penned a letter to Oregonโ€™sย governor.

โ€œI am tendering my resignation from the Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) effective immediately,โ€ Cribbins, who is currently running for state office, wrote in a letter posted to Facebook by her campaign. She cited the timing of the land conservation permit decision, calling it โ€œpurelyย political.โ€

โ€œClearly, this is not the Oregon way,โ€ the letter concludes, โ€œand I will not lend my credibility to this process anyย longer.โ€

Cribbins retains her seat as a Coos County commissioner. Sheย was also recently appointed to a federal Environmental Protection Agency advisory committee on local government, which advises Trump-appointee Andrew Wheeler.

The land conservation commission had emphasized the significance of the negative impacts on Oregon and its coast that Jordan Cove construction would have as it issued its state permitย denial.

โ€œAfter careful review of the proposed project, in conjunction with receiving extensive public comment, and coordination with coastal partners, [Department of Land Conservation and Development] has determined that the coastal adverse effects from the project will be significant and undermine the vision set forth by the [Oregon Coastal Management Plan] and its enforceable policies,โ€ the commission wrote in their Februaryย 19 letter (emphasis in original). โ€œCoastal effects analyses show that the project will negatively impact Oregonโ€™s coastal scenic and aesthetic resources, a variety of endangered and threatened species, critical habitat and ecosystem services, fisheries resources, commercial and recreational fishing and boating, and commercial shipping and transportation, among other sectors critical to theย state.โ€

The Jordan Cove project would export U.S. and Canadian fossil fuels โ€”ย enough to fill roughly 120 liquefied natural gas tankers aย year.

Project opponents say that without permits from the state of Oregon, the Jordan Cove fossil fuel export project cannot be built. โ€œOregon has concluded that the Jordan Cove LNG project would have significant adverse effects on the state’s coast and without permits from the state of Oregon, Jordan Cove LNG cannot move forward,โ€ Courtney Johnson, attorney and executive director at Crag Law Center, said in a statement following the LCDCโ€™s permitย denial.

Jordan Cove has 30 days from the LCDCโ€™s denial to appeal the stateโ€™sย decision.

On Monday, Jordan Cove representatives urged FERC to approve the project over Oregonโ€™s rejection. โ€œA [Coastal Zone Management Act] consistency determination โ€˜is a permit issued under federal law,โ€™ and state [Coastal Zone Management Act] objections are subject to plenary federal administrative override,โ€ David Owens, an attorney representing the Jordan Cove Energy Project and the Pacific Connector Gas Pipeline wrote in a Februaryย 24ย letter to FERC.

The FERC commissioner who cast the deciding vote to delay a decision cited the stateโ€™s permit denials at the hearing last week. โ€œI want to see what the State of Oregon said, and I need that information to inform my decision, whether Iโ€™m ultimately going to vote for or against Jordan Cove,โ€ McNamee said.

The land conservation permit is not the only permit that the Jordan Cove project currentlyย lacks.

In January, Oregonโ€™s Department of State Lands detailed over a half dozen categories of โ€œcritical informationโ€ that the Jordan Cove project had not yet provided to state officials after the companyโ€™s permit application was first deemed incomplete in November 2017. Days later, Jordan Cove withdrew its application for thatย permit.

And in Mayย 2019 state officials denied a required Clean Water Act permit for Jordan Cove, citing concerns about the hazards posed to the stateโ€™sย waters.

State officials predict a legal battle may be on the horizon. โ€œI think the evidence is very clear that the strategy now for this project is to wholly ignore Oregon and its requirements and to have the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission approve it, and somehow have the courts rule that that Oregon law, that quite clearly can’t be preempted by the federal government, can be,โ€ State Sen. Jeff Golden said in early February after Jordan Cove withdrew its land permit application. He described a โ€œlegal fight that almost certainly is coming, to uphold the law of the land and tell the Trump administration you don’t get to cancel environmental safeguards all over this country on behalf of the fossil fuelย industry.โ€

Oregonโ€™s governor Kate Brown has also said the state โ€œwould consider all available optionsโ€ if FERC attempted to override the stateโ€™s permitย processes.

Itโ€™s not clear when FERC will reconvene to consider the Jordan Cove project. Legal experts have said that the law also allows Jordan Cove to appeal to the U.S. Secretary of Commerce, currently Trump appointee Wilbur Ross, to approve the project without the stateโ€™s sign off. Ross has previously expressed support for the Jordan Coveย project.

Environmentalists called on FERC to reject the permit when it doesย reconvene.

โ€œTens of thousands of people across the region have spoken out against this Jordan Cove LNG for over a decade,โ€ Allie Rosenbluth, campaign director of Rogue Climate, said in a Februaryย 20 statement. โ€œItโ€™s time to put an end to Jordan Cove LNG for good this time so our communities can focus on creating local jobs in clean energyย instead.โ€

Main Image: Coos Bay, Oregon, in 2012. The proposed Jordan Cove LNG export terminal site is in the lower left. Credit:ย RBrittsan,ย CC BYSAย 3.0

1-DSC09675
Sharon Kelly is an attorney and investigative reporter based in Pennsylvania. She was previously a senior correspondent at The Capitol Forum and, prior to that, she reported for The New York Times, The Guardian, The Nation, Earth Island Journal, and a variety of other print and online publications.

Related Posts

Analysis
on

Premier Danielle Smith can expect new tariffs, fewer revenue streams, and a provincial deficit brought on by lowered oil prices.

Premier Danielle Smith can expect new tariffs, fewer revenue streams, and a provincial deficit brought on by lowered oil prices.
on

Jeremy Clarkson spreads well-worn conspiracy theory that casts inheritance farm tax policy as plot to โ€œreplace farmers with migrantsโ€.

Jeremy Clarkson spreads well-worn conspiracy theory that casts inheritance farm tax policy as plot to โ€œreplace farmers with migrantsโ€.
on

Premier Danielle Smith declared sheโ€™s pursuing โ€˜every legal optionโ€™ in her fight against Trudeauโ€™s federal proposal to curb emissions.

Premier Danielle Smith declared sheโ€™s pursuing โ€˜every legal optionโ€™ in her fight against Trudeauโ€™s federal proposal to curb emissions.
on

The Climate Policy Institute attending the UN summit was founded by a state-backed think tank which has received fossil fuel funding.

The Climate Policy Institute attending the UN summit was founded by a state-backed think tank which has received fossil fuel funding.