Canadian Town Evacuated After Another Oil Train Derails and Burns

mikulka color
on

Early in the morning of February 6, an oil train derailed and caught fire near Guernsey, Saskatchewan, resulting in the Canadian village’s evacuation. This is the second oil train to derail and burn near Guernsey, following one in December that resulted in a fire and oil spill of 400,000ย gallons.

According to the CBC,ย eyewitness Kyle Brown reported thatย โ€œhe saw a huge fire after the trainย derailed.โ€

โ€œIt looks like an inferno,โ€ said Brown. โ€œLike a war zone, really. It is prettyย bad.โ€

The Canadian Pacific (CP) train was carrying crude oil and reportedly derailed approximately 2.5 kilometers (1.5 miles) from town. News reports indicate thatย the train crew escaped withoutย harm.

Local resident Blaine Weber spoke to the Global News after this second derailment and expressed frustration that Canadian Pacific Railway,ย the rail company operatingย the trains,ย has not been forthcoming with answers about theย derailments.

โ€œCP doesnโ€™t seem to be answering any questions from either the public or the authorities,โ€ Weberย said.

Canadian Pacific also is under scrutinyย overย a potential cover up of the details surrounding a runaway freight train accident in 2019 that resulted in the death of all three crewย members.

Huge Increase in Canadian Oil-by-Rail Brings Moreย Accidents

A month ago I wrote that the forecast for oil by rail for 2020 would include more trains, fires, and spills. The Canadian oil industry is moving record volumes of oil by rail to the U.S. and with that increase, expect to seeย moreย accidents.

Last week, Reuters reported that the CEO of Imperial Oil, a Canadian subsidiary of ExxonMobil, which lobbied against new oil-by-rail regulationsย in the U.S.,ย was eager to ship more oil byย train.

โ€œWe see with the current differentials and arbitrage, it makes good economic sense for us to ship barrels on the rail,โ€ said Brad Corson, CEO ofย Imperial.

As DeSmog has reported in detail,ย theseย trains are currently unsafe to operate. The new tankย cars that regulators and the rail industry promised were a safety improvement for reducing oil spills and explosionsย have now failed in five out of fiveย majorย derailments.

U.S. regulations requiringย oil trains to have modern braking systems, known asย electronically controlled pneumatic (ECP) brakesย โ€” which Canadian operators would have had to comply with as well โ€” were repealed inย 2017.

And the volatile mixture of Canadian bitumen with condensate that is being moved in these Canadian trainsย has proven to ignite in derailments just like the volatile Bakken oil from North Dakota that was involved in the deadly Lac-Megantic, Quebec,ย accident inย 2013.

With oil companies like Imperial making plans to greatly increase the use of rail to move Canadian oil to U.S. ports and refineries, my early predictions for 2020 are already comingย true.

Main image: Site of December 2019 CP oil train accident site, with the derailment looking south. Credit: Transportation Safety Board of Canada,ย CCย BYNCNDย 2.0

mikulka color
Justin Mikulka is a research fellow at New Consensus. Prior to joining New Consensus in October 2021, Justin reported for DeSmog, where he began in 2014. Justin has a degree in Civil and Environmental Engineering from Cornell University.

Related Posts

on

The party has pumped out hundreds of adverts falsely stating that Labour would introduce a โ€œnational ULEZโ€, and pay per mile charges.

The party has pumped out hundreds of adverts falsely stating that Labour would introduce a โ€œnational ULEZโ€, and pay per mile charges.
on

This article by The Energy Mix is published here as part of the global journalism collaboration Covering Climate Now. A citizensโ€™ committee appointed by the City of Edmonton is calling on Mayor...
on

But demand for hydrogen-powered vehicles remains low, and claims the gas is a net-zero technology are still unproven.

But demand for hydrogen-powered vehicles remains low, and claims the gas is a net-zero technology are still unproven.
on

Campaigners charge that the ads are misleading the public about the proposed projectโ€™s likely climate harms.

Campaigners charge that the ads are misleading the public about the proposed projectโ€™s likely climate harms.