How the Climategate Email Hack Laid the Foundations for the Fake News Era

authordefault
on

DeSmog UKโ€™s first editor, Brendan Montague, shares his personal experience of investigating climate science deniers at the time ofย Climategate.

Lord Lawson stepped to the curb hailing a taxi. We had both been at an event in a swish Fleet Street hotel discussing illegal phone hacking by journalists. I had followed him out onto the pavement and asked whether the hacking of scientists’ emails from the servers of the British university had been unethical โ€” as well as criminal. โ€œIt was a whistleblower,โ€ he scowled. The black taxi took off, leaving me in a cloud ofย diesel.

Another Lord, though of a different stripe, Lord Monckton, I have met many times. The one that comes to mind is when he was the star turn during a fringe event ofย climate deniers near the Vaticanย in April 2015. I began by asking whether he, as a Catholic, believed the Pope could in fact be fallible when pronouncing climate change the challenge of our age. Before I knew where we were, the faux peer was accusing Barack Obama of being the centre of aย global Communist-Fascist conspiracy.

Dr S Fred Singer I interviewed at aย Heartland Institute conference in Las Vegas, the United States, back in 2014. He spoke quietly and softly, explaining his role in recruiting Lawson, the former British chancellor, to the climate denial cause. This mattered because Singer is the grandfather of the denial of climate science, and has beenย associated with both tobaccoย and oilย companies.

These three men were influential in turning Climategate into an international scandal 10 years agoย now.


Like what you’re reading? Support our work!ย 
Donate to DeSmog.com on Crowdriseย andย donate to DeSmog UK on Patreon.


Creating aย storm

The illegal hacking of thousands of private emails between climate scientists, both at the University of East Anglia and elsewhere,ย and their publication in November 2009 was supposed to be the smoking gun whichย proved that hundreds of highly respected, indentured university scientists working around the world had conspired together to exaggerate the risks from climateย breakdown.

The target of the hack attack hadย beenย Pennsylvania State Universityย Professor Michael Mann, the author of the firstย โ€˜Hockey Stickโ€™ graphย which showed a dramatic uptick in average global temperatures following hundreds of years of a fairly stable climate.ย Professor Phil Jonesย was collateral damage: accused of academic dishonesty, hauled in front of a powerful Parliamentary committee to answer these trumped up charges, his lifeโ€™s work unfairly called into question. Heย considered suicide.

Climategate should have been a storm in a teacup. The emails revealed nothing new. A few choice phrases were taken out of context, twisted, and presented as damning evidence. It was Lord Lawson who turned it into a crisis for climateย science.

He launched the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF) in Parliament just in time to make best use of the faux scandal, toured the newspaper offices using his reputation as Thatcherโ€™s one time chancellor to persuade editors to take the event seriously, and calledย on his Tory friends toย open their cheque-booksย to fund his opaque thinkย tank.

The GWPF scored some initial successes. Lawson is said to have persuaded his former friend, Lionel Barber, until recently the editor of the Financial Times, to take the Climategate fiasco seriously. This in turn likely influenced the Guardian in its decision to run day after day ofย coverage of the hacked emails, and its reportersโ€™ fruitless attempt toย find the hacker.

Lawson was also influential in the decision of theย Science and Technology Committeeย of the House of Commons to launch its investigation โ€” trapping Professor Jones under the cameras and the hot lights to answer evidently preposterous allegations. Lawson, even during a hearing which he had been influential in being opened, refused to say who wasย funding his new thinktank.

Manufacturingย denial

Alongside Lawson, Singerย andย Monckton were also thereย from the very beginning and had significant roles to play in the development of the GWPF.

Singer was amongย the first climate deniersย in the world, indeed when he entered the fray most climate scientists were aware of the complexity and contingency in the research. It was firmly established that carbon dioxide in the atmosphere caused heating, and that the amount pumped out through the use of fossil fuels was inextricably rising. But issues like the sensitivity of the atmosphere to change and how quickly this would change was still hotlyย debated.

Singer worked with the Atlas Economic Research Foundationย (now Atlas Network) in the United States. The foundation was primarily concerned with promoting free market, neoliberal economics. Friedrich von Hayek was the intellectual inspiration. He argued that any regulation would distort the market, leading toย hardship.

This ideology was very much in the ascendancy around the world: Lord Lawson has been its โ€œchief architectโ€ in the UK and as chancellor had torn apart the regime of financial regulations. But as well as causing economic collapse in many of the economies where it was tested, neoliberalism now faced the challenge posed by climate science โ€” which would inevitably lead to calls to stop (or regulate, or tax) fossil fuelย use.


Image: Nigel Lawson at Chatham House in London in 2016. Credit: Chatham House CC BYย 2.0

The Atlas Foundation turned to Singer for help. The physicist had previouslyย worked with the tobacco industryย deliberately creating smoke and mirrors around the increasing scientific consensus that smoking caused cancer. The foundation received money from theย oil industry, including Koch Industriesย and ExxonMobil, and was instrumental inย founding the Institute of Economic Affairsย (IEA) in the UK. It was a trustee of theย IEA โ€” David Hendersonย โ€” whoย first approached Lord Lawson at an event hosted byย the London School of Economicsย and persuaded him to take up the cause of climateย denial.

Lord Monckton also had a part to play. A viscount, Monckton was born into money, but despite hisย rather eccentric denials, actually missed out on becoming a member of the House of Lords when hereditary peers were abolished. The viscount worked for a very short period for Thatcherโ€™s policy unit. He laterย lost ยฃ1m in prize moneyย when he launched a puzzle betting no-one could crack it. Theyย could.

Monckton became something of a hero to the climate denier community when he published a two-page rant in the Sunday Telegraphย claiming that he alone had exposed the fatal flaw of the science of climate change. The rather eccentric ramblings had originally been drafted as a report for a private investor (with an historic interest in fracking). He was also instrumental in formulating talking points from the Climategate scandal for climate science deniers across theย world.


Image: Christopher Monckton giving a talk on global warming in the US in 2009. Credit: Don Irvine CC BYNDย 2.0

Monckton โ€” if you believe his side of the story โ€” advised Lawson to establish the GWPF and take up his new climate denier cause โ€”ย attacking scienceย rather than policy. He also claimed to have recommended Dr Benny Peiser โ€” who wrote his dissertation on whether people are more athletically active in the summer โ€” as the head of the charity. Peiser denied this version of events, desperate to distance Lawson and the think tank from the discredited and conspiracy-proneย Monckton.

Politicalย game

Lawson once boasted that he was responsible for what he (modestly) called Lawsonโ€™s Law: he advised the Tory party not to fight elections based on what the electorate actually cared about, but instead to persuade the electorate to care about what the Tory party could win an electionย on.

Lawson did not advise fake news, but it encouraged a distortion of reality that has seriously undermined our politics. It opened theย floodgates.

Along the way, the GWPF has gotten into bed with the wildest of right-wing neoliberal think tanks, becoming intimately entwinedย with those responsible for serious spin and corporate lobbying aroundย Brexit.

Lawson himself was instrumental in the Vote Leave campaign (before applying forย residency in France). He was happy to appeal to reactionary populism to settle scores within the Toryย party.

One consequence of this is that Nigel Farage long ago adopted the tactics of his namesake. Farage has dabbled in climate denial. He has gone further in stirring up populism. He is the master of scapegoating. And he is forever throwing โ€œdead catsโ€ into the political arena, keeping us constantly focused on our relationship with the EU. And in doing so, his Brexit Party โ€” a party riddled with a Lawsonian brand of climate science denial โ€” came close to destroying Lawsonโ€™s Tory party while continuing to push the UK towards the hardest ofย Brexits.

Movingย on

Lawson, Monckton, and Singer have all quietly fallen off the radar. But their legacy, honed through the manufactured scandal of Climategate, livesย on.

Lawson made himself chairman of the GWPF for life, but age has โ€” with the same inevitability as climate breakdown โ€” taken its toll and he has retired from climate politics to his beautiful mansion in the south of France. The GWPF lost the argument. It is now ineffective, losing support, and should soon be defunct.ย Singer has long retiredย from his think tank. Monckton is still attacking the Pope, but to noย effect.

From climate denial and the fakest of fake news, to corporate lobbying and media spin โ€” you reapย what youย sow.

Main image:ย I wish this were fake news. Credit: peakpx,ย Creative Commons Zero – CC0

Related Posts

on

New documents show how a deceptive PR strategy pioneered in 1950s California first exposed the risk of climate change and then helped the industry deny it.

New documents show how a deceptive PR strategy pioneered in 1950s California first exposed the risk of climate change and then helped the industry deny it.
on

Meet those aiming to capitalize on Trump's re-election by slashing climate action, from Koch network fixtures to Project 2025 and beyond.

Meet those aiming to capitalize on Trump's re-election by slashing climate action, from Koch network fixtures to Project 2025 and beyond.
on

UCP pledges to abandon the provinceโ€™s net zero targets, and remove the designation of CO2 as a pollutant.

UCP pledges to abandon the provinceโ€™s net zero targets, and remove the designation of CO2 as a pollutant.
on

Speaking at the UCP annual general meeting, the Premier took shots at the federal government and vowed not to โ€œbudge an inch.โ€

Speaking at the UCP annual general meeting, the Premier took shots at the federal government and vowed not to โ€œbudge an inch.โ€