Science Museum Feeling the Heat Over Fossil Fuel Sponsorship, Emails Show

Rich
on

The UKโ€™s Science Museum and oil giant BP are increasingly concerned about criticism of their ongoing partnership, email correspondence seen by DeSmogย suggests.

The news comes as the Royal Shakespeare Company and National Theatre announce they will be ending their partnerships with BP and Shell,ย respectively.

Emails released through a Freedom of Information (FOI) request show Sir Ian Blatchford, Director of the Science Museum, and a BP representative arranging a meeting to discuss fossil fuel sponsorship of the arts the day before a public debate on theย issue.

Forwarding on an email sent to the museumโ€™s staff in which he defends the Science Museumโ€™s relationship with the oil company, Blatchford says this is why the BP representative has been โ€œon hisย mindโ€.

In the all-staff email circulated at the end of July, Blatchford dismisses the idea that oil sponsorship of the arts amounts to greenwashing, calling it a โ€œtriteโ€ argument, and says the collaboration enables them to โ€œachieve moral and publicย goodโ€.

Tateย snub

In the email to staff, covered by the FT at the time, Blatchford dismisses the Tateโ€™s declaration of a โ€œclimate emergencyโ€ earlier in theย month.

Addressing what he calls recent โ€œmedia chatterโ€ around oil sponsorship, Blatchfordย writes:

โ€œThe Tate announcement got such limited coverage, perhaps because press releases that are more statement than substance do not always play well with a jadedย media.โ€

Blatchford says he instead favours maintaining ties with oil companies as a means of engaging with them on issues like climate change, an approach taken by the Natural Historyย Museum.

โ€œI discuss these issues regularly with vital sister organisations like the Natural History Museum and their team take the same view,โ€ heย writes.

Blatchford goes on to praise the efforts of institutions like the Church of England and the Wellcome Trust to pressure fossil fuel companies from the inside, deeming this โ€œmore strategic andย honestโ€.

โ€œThe Board and senior team [of the Wellcome Trust] take the same view as us: engage, debate, challenge energy companies, because walking away is the easy and fruitlessย option.โ€

DeSmog asked the museum for details on what efforts it is making to engage with BP on climate change but did not receive aย response.


Can you help support DeSmog’s work? Become a patronย today!


Bridget Mckenzie, from the Climate Museum initiative, told DeSmog that Blatchfordโ€™s dismissal of the Tateโ€™s โ€œclimate emergencyโ€ announcement missed the point. She said the declaration was about โ€œmaking a public pledge to take actionโ€, not because they โ€œwantedย publicityโ€.

Engagement with oil and gas companies in the manner Blatchford advocates had not achieved the โ€œdesired resultsโ€, sheย added.

โ€˜Demonising fossil fuel industry isย unproductiveโ€™

Blatchford argues oil sponsorship of the arts should continue because โ€œmajor energy companies have the capital, geography, people and logistics to be major players in finding the solutions.โ€ He said that โ€œdemonising them is seriouslyย unproductive.โ€

He also insists the museum would not be prepared to work with โ€œany energy companyโ€, explaining that the museum would โ€œneed to be convinced that their actions and values align with our mission andย objectivesโ€.

The Science Museum did not clarify whether it had previously refused to work with any particular energyย companies.

Reacting to the emails, Chris Garrard, Co-director of Culture Unstained, which campaigns for arts institutions to refuse fossil fuel sponsorship and submitted the FOI request, said the partnership should make the Science Museum uneasy. Heย said:

โ€œSir Ian Blatchford continues to both defend and endorse the companies that are causing the climate crisis, even after respected climate scientists have highlighted how his oil sponsors helped to spread disinformation on climate science, lobby against climate action and have business plans that directly undermine the Paris Climateย Accord.โ€

Big Oilย links

The museum previously worked with fellow oil giant Shell, something Blatchford also addresses in his email toย staff.

In 2015, an FOI by the Art Not Oil coalition, of which Culture Unstained is a member, revealed how Shell had tried to influence a climate change project it was sponsoring at theย museum.

While admitting that the museum had invited Shell to offer input into plans for the project, Blatchford insists in the email that it did not adopt any of the companyโ€™sย suggestions.

An August 2014 email from a Shell employee, however, claimed the museum was producing a video on Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) technology โ€œbased on Shellโ€™s CCSย videoโ€.

BP has also sought to influence the museumโ€™s exhibitions over theย years.

In the midst of the companyโ€™sย efforts to rebrand itself as โ€œBeyond Petroleumโ€, BP played a major role in shaping the design of the museumโ€™s Energy Hall, according to a staff magazine from theย time.

A magazine feature article from 2004 explained how an advisory board of 10 BP employees was drafted in to โ€œhelp with content for theย exhibitsโ€.

The museumโ€™s then Sponsor Liaison Manager told the magazine: โ€œThe Science Museumโ€™s goal is to maximise its relationship with BP.โ€

โ€œWe would like to help them meet their objectives on different levels, including corporate responsibility, education strategy and globalย strategy.โ€

Photo credit: Paul Hudson/Flickr/CC BYย 2.0

Rich
Rich was the UK team's Deputy Editor from 2020-22 and an Associate Editor until September 2023. He joined the organisation in 2018 as a UK-focused investigative reporter, having previously worked for the climate charity Operation Noah.

Related Posts

on

Canadian environmentalist Tzeporah Berman makes the case for a "bold idea" to end the era of coal, oil and gas.

Canadian environmentalist Tzeporah Berman makes the case for a "bold idea" to end the era of coal, oil and gas.
Analysis
on

Premier Danielle Smith can expect new tariffs, fewer revenue streams, and a provincial deficit brought on by lowered oil prices.

Premier Danielle Smith can expect new tariffs, fewer revenue streams, and a provincial deficit brought on by lowered oil prices.
on

Premier Danielle Smith declared sheโ€™s pursuing โ€˜every legal optionโ€™ in her fight against Trudeauโ€™s federal proposal to curb emissions.

Premier Danielle Smith declared sheโ€™s pursuing โ€˜every legal optionโ€™ in her fight against Trudeauโ€™s federal proposal to curb emissions.
on

Melinda Janki wants to protect her home country of Guyana from the harms caused by Big Oil.

Melinda Janki wants to protect her home country of Guyana from the harms caused by Big Oil.