Greenpeace Shuts Down Houston Ship Channel to Protest Oil Exports as Democratic Candidates Arrive in Texas for Debate

1-DSC09675
on

Today, as Democratic presidential contenders arrive for a major debate this evening in Houston, 22 activists from Greenpeace sought to shut down what they called the countryโ€™s โ€œlargest fossil fuel thoroughfare,โ€ the Houston Ship Channel, by rappelling from the Fred Hartman Bridge in Baytown,ย Texas.

Greenpeace said the rappellers plan to stay in place for 24 hours, through tonightโ€™s Democraticย debates.

โ€œWe can either take bold action to combat the climate crisis today or suffer the consequences โ€” more floods, more mega-storms, and more fires โ€” for years to come,โ€ Annie Leonard, the executive director of Greenpeace USA, said in a statement on theย action.

Greenpeace says it’s blockaded the Houston Ship Canal https://t.co/8cvsKw29HI #OOTT

โ€” Helen Robertson (@HelenCRobertson) September 12, 2019

The group estimates that 700,000 barrels of oil a day travel through the blocked shippingย lanes.

Activists unfurled colorful banners as they dangled above the shippingย channel.

โ€œI grew up in the East Texas Oil Field, a place where the oil industry touches everything. I know how much power oil executives have over our democracy,โ€ Greenpeace USA activist Mike Herbert, one of the climbers, said in a statement. โ€œThatโ€™s why Iโ€™m taking action to shut down the Houston Ship Channel, the largest fossil fuel thoroughfare in theย country.โ€

Vehicular traffic has continued to flow across the bridge despite a heavy police presence, according to one witness, who adds that police had arrived quickly but were unable to prevent the 11 rappellers fromย descending.

โ€œA portion of the traffic in the Ship Channel has stopped from Light 102A to 104 due to the demonstration,โ€ KHOU news in Houston reported this morning. An observer on the scene said that ship traffic had backed up to Galveston, Texas, in the afternoon, roughly eight hours after the protestย began.

Lisa Ashley, a spokesperson for the Port of Houston told The Hill that the impacts from the delays were not expected to be โ€œdevestatingโ€ because ship schedules are kept flexible since delays can arise for a broad variety of reasons, adding that port officials โ€œrespect the value of free speech, as long as it’s peaceful andย legal.โ€

In June, the U.S. briefly became the worldโ€™s largest oil exporter, surging past Saudi Arabia, according to an International Energy Agency (IEA) report releasedย today.

โ€œBooming shale production has allowed the U.S. to close in on, and briefly overtake, Saudi Arabia as the worldโ€™s top oil exporter โ€ฆ in June, after crude exports surged above 3 million barrels per day (bpd),โ€ the agency wrote in its monthly report. Saudi Arabia has since reclaimed the top slot, with the IEA noting hurricanes and international trade disputes had helped slow U.S.ย exports.

Much of that exported oil flowed through the Houston Ship Channel, which also borders one of the worldโ€™s largest petrochemicalย corridors.

โ€œGroups like t.e.j.a.s. ย (Texas Environmental Justice Advocacy Services) are building power with fenceline communities, fighting to prevent dangerous petrochemical disasters and leaks โ€” while holding corporations accountable for them, and famously organizing โ€˜Toxic Tours,โ€™โ€ Greenpeace wrote in a Septemberย 10 post. โ€œDemocratic candidates might learn a thing or two from these tours about fighting for environmental justice.โ€

In July, an explosion at ExxonMobilโ€™s Baytown, Texas, petrochemical plant injured 66 workers and led to at least three lawsuits, as DeSmog previously reported. The explosion was the second at ExxonMobilโ€™s Baytown site thisย year.

During last week’s climate town hall, which was aired for seven hours by CNN, the same 10ย Democratic candidates each faced 40 minutes of questions from attendees and CNN reporters. While candidates like Joe Biden, under fire for his ties to fossil fuel companies and the Obama administration’s promotion of fossil fuel exports, emphasized during that town hall that the U.S. is responsible for just 15 percent of global carbon emissions, that figure does not account for U.S.-exported fossilย fuels.

In 2015, President Obama lifted a four-decade long ban on exporting U.S. crude oil and his administration actively promoted exports of liquefied natural gas and other fossil fuels despite their impacts on theย climate.

President Trump has falsely claimed that climate change is a โ€œhoaxโ€ and worked to roll back regulatory efforts to curb the fossil fuel industry’s climate and other environmentalย impacts.

UPDATED 9/12/2019: This piece has been updated at 5:30 PM EDT.

Main image: Greenpeace activists rappel off of the Fred Hartman Bridge in Baytown, Texas, to protest fossil fuel exports along the Houston Ship Channel. Credit: Greenpeace

1-DSC09675
Sharon Kelly is an attorney and investigative reporter based in Pennsylvania. She was previously a senior correspondent at The Capitol Forum and, prior to that, she reported for The New York Times, The Guardian, The Nation, Earth Island Journal, and a variety of other print and online publications.

Related Posts

on

This story was published in partnership with Gen Dread and a video version will be available online on November 16 as part of the Climate Consciousness Summit 2024, staged by the Pocket Project in...
on

Lucy von Sturmer and Duncan Meisel are building communities of creatives dedicated to preventing the advertising and public relations industry from casting polluters as climate saviours.

Lucy von Sturmer and Duncan Meisel are building communities of creatives dedicated to preventing the advertising and public relations industry from casting polluters as climate saviours.
on

Corporations have found ways to be heard during negotiations on reversing the drastic global decline in plant and animal life.

Corporations have found ways to be heard during negotiations on reversing the drastic global decline in plant and animal life.
on

Was the environmental monitoring for the Crescent Midstream oil spill as robust as regulators claim?

Was the environmental monitoring for the Crescent Midstream oil spill as robust as regulators claim?