Climate Science Deniers Planning European Misinformation Campaign, Leaked Documents Reveal

Rich
on

A coalition of climate science denial groups isย gearing up for a European media blitz later this month, in an apparent bid to derail efforts to set an EU-wide โ€œnet zeroโ€ emissions target, documents obtained by DeSmog show.

Plans for a self-styled โ€œEuropean Declarationโ€ include press conferences in Brussels, Rome and Oslo and a letter to be sent to leaders of EU and UN institutions, scheduled forย mid-September.ย 

The letter claims to have โ€œ400 independent Climate Scientists and Professionalsโ€ signed up soย far.

Some notable signatories are part of a trans-Atlantic network of thinktanks pushing for environmental deregulation post-Brexit, and haveย a history of climate science denial. A number of former employees of the networkโ€™s member organisations are now staffers in Boris Johnsonโ€™s cabinet.

Titled โ€˜There is no climate emergencyโ€™, the groupโ€™s letter claims that current changes in the climate are โ€œto be expected from the cyclic behaviour of the climate systemโ€ and that there is โ€œno proofโ€ that carbon dioxide is a major cause of globalย warming.

Another of the groupโ€™s โ€œurgent messagesโ€ is to โ€œstrongly opposeโ€ an EU carbon neutrality goal, a policy that was blocked by Poland and three other member states in June and is set to be discussed again at a European Council meeting inย October.

Robert Brulle, Professor of Sociology at Drexel University and an expert on climate science denial, told DeSmog the campaign looked like a panicked response to recent high-profile efforts to highlight the climateย crisis:

โ€œThe rise of the Extinction Rebellion movement, and the immense popularity and influence of Greta Thunberg, are having a significant impact on media coverage of climate change and concern about this issue. I would suspect that the aim of the campaign is to blunt the impact of these climate advocacyย efforts.โ€

โ€œThe talking points are stale and patently scientific nonsense. That isn’t critical. The point would be to keep the โ€˜contestedโ€™ nature of climate changeย alive.โ€

Geoffrey Supran, a Research Associate at Harvard University who gave evidence to the European Parliament in March on oil giant ExxonMobilโ€™s historic promotion of climate science denial, said he thought the move was an attempt to distract from the various upcoming efforts to increase action on climate change globally, such as the UN Climate Action Summit at the end of theย month:

โ€œThese people are the rhetorical equivalent to the kid in the classroom screaming โ€˜Look at me! Look at me!โ€™ They’re desperate forย attention.โ€ย 

โ€œAs always, they presumably hope to muddy the waters of public and political discourse on the climate crisis. To feed the echo chamber of sympathetic right-wing media and blogs, and to prey on naive and unsuspecting journalists who may be tempted to exercise false balance in their climateย coverage.โ€

Coordinatedย effort

The campaign is being spearheaded by a new Netherlands-based climate science denial group called the Climate Intelligence Foundation (CLINTEL), launched in April with funding from Niek Sandmann, a multimillionaire real estateย developer.

The groupโ€™s co-founder Guus Berkhout, an engineering professor who began his career at Shell and set up the Delphi Consortium in the 1980s to develop new exploration methods for the oil and gas industry, told DeSmog that interest in the campaign had beenย โ€œoverwhelmingโ€.ย 

Berkhout said there were plans to hold press conferences in European capitals and that the effort was being โ€œexpanded to a World Climate Declarationโ€. He declined to offer further details orย comment.

In addition to CLINTEL, the international organising group includes some well-known figures from the climate misinformation world,ย including:ย 

In an email seen by DeSmog, Berkhout explains that โ€œsignatures are being collected from persons who give a valuable contribution to the climate debate and are recognised as suchโ€. He goes on to boast that there are โ€œalready a lot of great names on theย listโ€.

Of the 400 signatories, only a handful have a background in climate science, with the majority being writers, engineers and geologists with no direct expertise in theย field.

In addition to the Cato Institute‘s Richard Lindzen, the list features numerous figures from US-based libertarian groups, including Patrick Michaels of the Competitive Enterprise Institute, and Charles Battig and Willie Soon from the Heartland Institute, which provides a total of 12 signatures alone. All three organisations are members of the Atlas Network, aย Koch-funded international umbrella body of free-marketย groups.

UK affiliates of the network include the Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA), the Adam Smith Institute (ASI) and the Taxpayersโ€™ Alliance. A number of former employees of these groups are now working in Boris Johnsonโ€™sย government.

Taxpayersโ€™ Alliance founder Matthew Elliott is reportedly advising new Chancellor Sajid Javid, whose Conservative leadership campaign he ran, while former employee Chloe Westley has joined Boris Johnsonโ€™s Number 10 team. International Trade Secretary Liz Truss has appointed two special advisors from the IEA and ASI.

UKย support

The UKโ€™s principal climate science denial group, the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF), founded by former Chancellor Nigel Lawson in the run-up to the 2009 Copenhagen climate summit, is also well-represented in theย campaign.

At least four members of its Academic Advisory Council feature in the letterโ€™s signatories, and other contributors to the GWPF have also backed theย โ€œdeclarationโ€.ย 

One is Northumbria University Professor Valentina Zharkova, who gave a lecture to the group last year claiming that climate change is caused by natural solar cycles. A paper Zharkova co-authored in June on the same subject was criticised for containing โ€œbasic errorsโ€ and an investigation into how it came to be published was launched by the scientific journal that printedย it.

CLINTEL also has close ties to the GWPF. Berkhout wrote an essay for the UK group last year insisting that climate change was purely a natural phenomenon. And in February, the GWPF published an article by its Dutch counterpart that said: โ€œYes, the Earth is warming up. But that is business as usual. Earthโ€™s history tells us that climate change has alwaysย happened.โ€ย 

The following month GWPF director Benny Peiser spoke at a gathering in Amsterdam where CLINTEL announced its upcomingย launch.ย 

At that event, Berkhout admitted: โ€œin this whole audience, apart from the organisation and a few brave ones, I don’t see young people. So the first thing we are going to do is talk with the young people.โ€ CLINTEL currently has a youth wing called โ€œYoung Clintelโ€.ย 

The GWPF did not respond to a request forย comment.

Other UK signatories include directors and former directors of lesser-known oil and gas companies, as well as five Fellows of the Geological Society, a professional body representing Earthย scientists.

In addition to the EU โ€œnet zeroโ€ emissions target under consideration, planned โ€œclimate strikeโ€ protests and the upcoming UN Climate Action Summit, the media offensive may also, given its European focus, be timed to coincide with a crunch government meeting in Germany on how the country will meet its 2030 emissions target, set to take place on 20ย September.

German signatories to the letter include a spokesperson for the European Institute for Climate and Energy (EIKE), which a Der Spiegel investigation earlier this year found had been working closely with the insurgent, far-right Alternative for Germany party to campaign against action on climateย change.

Image credit: European Parliament/Flickr/CC BYNCNDย 2.0

Rich
Rich was the UK team's Deputy Editor from 2020-22 and an Associate Editor until September 2023. He joined the organisation in 2018 as a UK-focused investigative reporter, having previously worked for the climate charity Operation Noah.

Related Posts

Analysis
on

We reflect on a year of agenda-setting stories that charted the political influence of fossil fuel interests in the UK and beyond.

We reflect on a year of agenda-setting stories that charted the political influence of fossil fuel interests in the UK and beyond.
on

The Heartland Institute, which questions human-made climate change, has established a new branch in London.

The Heartland Institute, which questions human-made climate change, has established a new branch in London.
on

Lord Frost is one of several departures from the Global Warming Policy Foundation, which has links to Tory leader Kemi Badenoch.

Lord Frost is one of several departures from the Global Warming Policy Foundation, which has links to Tory leader Kemi Badenoch.
on

Trumpโ€™s nominees are backed by major players in the world of climate obstruction โ€“ from Project 2025 and Koch network fixtures to oil-soaked Christian nationalists.

Trumpโ€™s nominees are backed by major players in the world of climate obstruction โ€“ from Project 2025 and Koch network fixtures to oil-soaked Christian nationalists.