First, Climate Change, Now the Global Extinction Crisis: Industry-Paid Hacks Deny Science to Congress

mikulka color
on

In this weekโ€™s Congressional hearing on the recent (and dire)ย UN Global Assessment of Biodiversity, conservation scientist Dr. Jacob Malcomย did not mince words as he explained the report’s startling findings thatย one million species are at risk ofย extinction.

โ€œWe are, as you have heard, losing species faster than ever in human history, tens to hundreds of times faster than the background rate of extinction,โ€ theย Defenders of Wildlife scientistย told the Congressional House Water, Oceans, and Wildlife Subcommittee.ย โ€œWe are in the middle of the sixth mass extinction, where the last time this happened it was because an asteroid hit the planet. Today we are thatย asteroid.โ€

Such a massive loss of plants, animals, and other speciesย would also, quite naturally,ย affect human life on earth. But just as they have with hearings on theย climate crisis,ย Congressional Republicans and theirย witnesses used thisย opportunity to attack the well-documented scientific evidence of a far-reaching global threat toย life.ย And they even used some of the same climate science deniers and tired arguments to doย it.

Theย comprehensive report they attacked gathers even more evidence that human activities are having a significant effect on global biodiversity, just as the scientific consensusย shows humansย are driving rapid changes in theย climate.ย 

โ€œThe evidence is crystal clear: Nature is in trouble. Therefore we are in trouble,โ€ Sandra Dรญaz, one of the co-chairs of the UN Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, told National Geographic.

Business as Usual With Republican Scienceย Denial

Marc Morano isnโ€™t a scientist but does make his money attacking scientists. From 2006 to 2009, Morano was the communications director for Senator James Inhofe (R-Okla.), who will be remembered for his stunt of throwing a snowball in Congress as he tried to discreditย climateย science.

Morano moved on from politics to working for organizations funded by oil companies, and heย currently runs the websiteย ClimateDepot.com, a project funded by the climate science-denyingย Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT), a conservative think tankย which hasย received funding from ExxonMobil, Chevron, andย the Koch brothers.

This week, Morano wasted no time in attackingย some of the actual scientists on the hearing’s panel,ย specifically Sir Robert T. Watson, whoย heads the UN agency that produced the biodiversity report. These attacks on fellow witnesses resulted in hearing Chairman Jared Huffman (D-CA) twice reprimandingย Morano.

Rep. Huffman had to ask that Morano โ€œshow respect for your fellowย panelists.โ€

However, oil industry-funded attacks on climate science,ย and even Robert Watson, are nothing new. In 2001 a memo to the Bush administration from Exxon lobbyist Randy Randolย specifically requests that Watson be removed as head of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), a position he held at theย time.

And Morano, a notorious climate science denier,ย is continuing this long tradition of groups funded by Exxon attacking Watson. Exxon has donated heavily to CFACTย andย was also involved in the infamous โ€œVictory Will Be Achievedโ€ memo.ย This memo, assembled by Randol and theย American Petroleum Institute,ย declaredย in 1998 that โ€œVictory will be achieved when average citizens ‘understand’ (recognize) uncertainties in climateย science.โ€

The other climate science denier on the witness panel this week was Dr. Patrick Moore, current head of the CO2 Coalition,ย an organization that grew out of a now-defunct group heavily funded byย Exxon.

What did the leader of an organization called โ€œthe CO2 Coalitionโ€ have to say about carbonย dioxide?

โ€œThere is no hard evidence that CO2 has anything to do with the change in temperature of the earthโ€™s climate,โ€ Moore told theย committee.

In fact, Exxonโ€™s own research accurately predicted the rise in CO2 and temperature which the world has beenย experiencing.

However, Moore not only made the claim that CO2 doesnโ€™t contribute to atmospheric warmingย โ€” a concept first demonstrated by Eunice Foote in 1856 โ€” but also said that because humans have been increasing the levels of CO2 in the atmosphere, they were actually the โ€œsalvation of life on earth.โ€ And while plants do use carbon dioxide, more CO2 is not necessarily good for plants.

Not everyone in the hearing seemed interested in the blatantly false statements coming fromย these industry-backed science deniers. Chairman Huffman noted that theย efforts came from the โ€œshadowy corners of these junior varsity thinkย tanks.โ€

Solutions Amid the Attacks andย Noise

Due to the format of Congressional hearings and the general GOP policy of climate science denial, these hearings typically offer very little in the way of solutions or actual debate. However, two of the panelists did speak about the threats to biodiversityย and comment onย solutions.

Malcom, the scientist from Defenders of Wildlife, called out the success of the U.S. Endangered Species Act. โ€œWe have forty some odd years showing that the Endangered Species Act has worked incredibly well and as we all know the American economy has continued to grow throughout that entire time,โ€ heย said.

Notably, the Trump administration currently is attempting to weaken the scope and effectiveness ofย the Endangered Species Act.

Perhaps the most concrete recommendation of the day came from Watson, who recommended that governments stop subsidizing industries that are causing harm to the climate and globalย species.

โ€œOne should get rid of many of these environmentally harmful subsidies in agriculture, energy, and transportation,โ€ Watson told theย committee.

With suggestions like these, Watson was an obvious target for industry-funded science deniers like Morano andย Moore.

Main image: Screen shot of witnesses Patrick Moore, Marc Morano, and Robert Watson in the May 22, 2019ย hearing of the Congressional House Water, Oceans, and Wildlife Subcommittee on the recent IPBES Global Assessment of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Servicesย report.

mikulka color
Justin Mikulka is a research fellow at New Consensus. Prior to joining New Consensus in October 2021, Justin reported for DeSmog, where he began in 2014. Justin has a degree in Civil and Environmental Engineering from Cornell University.

Related Posts

Future nature talks must be protected from โ€œintense industry pressureโ€ say campaigners.

Future nature talks must be protected from โ€œintense industry pressureโ€ say campaigners.
on

As Prime Minister Justin Trudeau once said back in 2015, โ€˜the atmosphere doesnโ€™t care where carbon is emitted.โ€™

As Prime Minister Justin Trudeau once said back in 2015, โ€˜the atmosphere doesnโ€™t care where carbon is emitted.โ€™
on

Immad Ahmed explains how "human-centered design" is helping displaced people in South Sudan and Bangladesh overcome daunting odds.

Immad Ahmed explains how "human-centered design" is helping displaced people in South Sudan and Bangladesh overcome daunting odds.
on

Oil and gas majors are splashing the cash in order to have a presence at the flagship climate talks in Azerbaijan.

Oil and gas majors are splashing the cash in order to have a presence at the flagship climate talks in Azerbaijan.