This week, during the House Committee on Natural Resources’ hearing on โClimate Change: Impacts and the Need to Act,โ Representatives heard about the threats that climate change poses to the safety, prosperity, and general well-being of Americans, and particularly to marginalized communities of color. Multiple experts testified on environmental and climate justice issues. However, one of the Republicans’ experts, Derrick Hollie of Reaching America, told a dramatically different story, attempting to argue that climate-friendly policies actually harm low income and minorityย communities.
During the hearing, Hollie did not disclose his organization’s involvement in multiple campaigns funded by the oil and gasย industries.
To the hearing, Chairman Raul Grijalva invited a couple of state governors who are working on strong climate policies, as well as climate scientist Dr. Kim Cobb, youth climate organizer Nadia Nazar, and environmental and climate justice activists Elizabeth Yeampierre of UPROSE and Rev. Lennox Yearwood Jr. of the Hip Hopย Caucus.
Hollie’s testimony, however, stuck out in stark contrast to those of Yeampierre and Rev. Yearwood. Hollie claims a mission of โaddressing complex social issues impacting African American communities today.โ But Hollie doesn’t work to protect these frontline, vulnerable communities from rampant air pollution or climate threats. Instead, Hollie often presents oil and gas development as the only way to address energy poverty in minority communities, and yesterday’s House hearing was noย exception.
Hollie did not tell the Committee, however, that his group has worked extensively on campaigns funded by the oil and gas industry, including the ill-fated, Koch-funded Fueling U.S. Forward campaign, and now the American Petroleum Institute’s Explore Offshore campaign. Hollie has not responded to questions about Reaching America’sย funding.
Eddie Bautista, executive director of the nonprofit NYC Environmental Justice Alliance, called the Fueling U.S. Forward campaign โan exploitative, sad and borderline racistย strategy.โ
In his opening testimony, Hollie portrayed renewable energy as too expensive for minority communities, while calling our nation’s โabundant supply of natural gasโฆthe solution to our nation’s energyย questions.โ
Hollie proposed a minority impact assessment for any new energy projects. However, these assessments only examined economic impacts, with no regard whatsoever for public health or the climate impacts that disproportionately impact communities ofย color.
Here’s Hollie’s openingย testimony:
Later, when Republican Rep. Paul Gosar of Arizona asked who would be most negatively impacted by a Green New Deal, Hollie said, โMinorities because we canโt afford rising costs associated withย policies.โ
While Hollie claims to advocate for the best interests of all minority communities, he repeatedly ignores real and measurable threats to public health and economic well-being that are created by rampant fossil fuel extraction and the impacts of climateย change.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Stay up to date with DeSmog news and alerts