COP24: Paris Agreement Rulebook 'Does Not Deliver What The World Needs'

authordefault
on

Following two tension-filled weeks at the UN climate talks in Poland, countries finally agreed on the operating manual to implement the Paris Agreement. While this rulebook is essential to kick-start the agreement in 2020, campaigners and scientists have warned of a stark disconnect between the urgency to prevent climate breakdown and the failed opportunity for radicalย action.

The rulebook covers a wide range of issues such as how countries should report their greenhouse gas emission reductions and who should pay what to help developing countries leapfrog fossil fuels and developย sustainably.

Given the elections of climate deniers Donald Trump in the US and Jair Bolsonaro in Brazil and strong obstruction from powerful oil and gas exporting countries such as the US and Saudi Arabia, the talks started in Katowice with lowย expectations.

Campaigners have accused the rulebook of being a compromise favouring corporate interests and countries which have been the most obstructive in the negotiationย process.

Vitumbiko Chinoko, from CARE โ€” an international humanitarian agency โ€” in Southern Africa, accused โ€œa few powerful countriesโ€ of holding multilateralism โ€œhostageโ€ during theย conference.

โ€œVulnerable countries cannot carry the weight of the world on their shoulders. It is unacceptable for governments to continue to cower behind the inaction of the US and other big polluters,โ€ heย said.

Patti Lynn, executive director of NGO Corporate Accountability, said the climate talks had ended โ€œwithout delivering what the worldย needsโ€.

โ€œGovernments fell far short of crafting a just and equitable roadmap to Parisโ€™ implementation. The root cause of this failure โ€” the fossil fuel industryโ€™s interference โ€” was on full display at these negotiations,โ€ sheย said.

Compromise

For those deeply involved in the process, the fact countries managed to agree on a single set of rules to implement the Paris Agreement โ€” with flexibility in some areas โ€” was a victory for multilateralism diplomacy in the face of growing populist movements rejecting climateย action.

โ€œDespite all the headwinds, the Paris Agreement has stayed course at COP24, demonstrating the kind of resilience it has been designed for,โ€ said Laurence Tubiana, CEO of NGO the European Climate Foundation and one of the architects of the Parisย Agreement.

The climate negotiations are a unique and very technical diplomatic exercise in which every country around the world have to agree on how to save theย planet.

As Spanish ecology minister Teresa Ribera told the BBC, this is a โ€œdifficultโ€ย process.

โ€œIt is like organising a party for 200 friends, and there’s a single menu that everybody has to eat. It is not so easy but we have got it,โ€ sheย said.


COP24 Presidentย Michaล‚ Kurtyka when the Paris Agreement rulebook is adopted. Image Credit: IISD/ENB

But there is also widespread acknowledgement that the package which was agreed late on Saturday night in Katowice is far from ambitious enough to deliver the level of climate action necessary to prevent climateย breakdown.

Christiana Figueres, former executive secretary of UN Climate Change (UNFCCC), said the rulebook was โ€œan important stepโ€ but that โ€œno one is entirely happy withย itโ€.

Reflecting on the final hours of the negotiation, Camilla Born, senior policy advisor at the environmental think tank E3G, told Climate Home News: โ€œWe are not going to agree what is necessary for the climate but we are going to agree what is possible in these politics. And that has gone a step further than what we have seen before going into theseย negotiations.โ€

Faced with the lack of leadership during the talks, UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres was forced to intervene during the conference and warned: โ€œTo waste this opportunity would compromise our last best chance to stop runaway climate change. It would not only be immoral, it would beย suicidal.โ€

In many ways, the talks have shown some of the limits of international diplomacy to deliver on climate action in line with the scientificย consensus.

Urgency versusย diplomacy

Urgency was very much the watchword for theย talks.

In October, leading climate scientists from the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), warned that the world had 12 years to take โ€œrapid, far-reaching and unprecedented changes in all aspects of societyโ€ to limit global temperature rise to 1.5 degrees Celsiusย and avoid the worst impacts of climateย change.

To achieve the 1.5 degree target, global emissions need to fall by 45 percent by 2030, according to the report. But the current trend is in the oppositeย direction.

During the first week of the talks, the Global Carbon Project launched a report estimating that global CO2 emissions will rise by 2.7 percent in 2018 โ€” the fastest increase in sevenย years.

One of the biggest setbacks in the negotiations was the joint effort from the US, Saudi Arabia, Russia and Kuwait to block the โ€œwelcomingโ€ of the IPCCโ€™s findings, and instead simply โ€œnoteโ€ theย report.

The final text โ€œwelcomes the timely completionโ€ of the report, rather than the findings themselves. Instead, the rulebook โ€œinvites parties [countries] to make use of the information ย contained in theย reportโ€.

For campaigners and NGOs pushing for a radical system change, this was a failed opportunity to raise the level ofย ambition.

Mohamed Adow, international climate lead for Christian Aid, said: โ€œThis was the first opportunity since the IPCC report for countries to prove to the world that they were taking thisย seriously.

โ€œBut the fact countries had to be dragged kicking and screaming to the finish line shows that some nations have not woken up to the urgent call of the IPCCย report.โ€

Countriesโ€™ current emission reduction pledges are on track to reach three to four degrees of warming โ€” far from the 1.5 degree target. According to a UN report, countries have to raise their current targets fivefold in order to meet the 1.5 degreeย goal.

In the final text agreed at Katowice, countries are not specifically asked to increase their ambitions but simply โ€œinvitedโ€ to consider enhancing their pledges by 2020. The Paris Agreement will kick in that year, and countries are set to re-submit or update their climateย pledges.

In a statement read out in Katowice when the text was adopted, UN chief Guterres said, โ€œfrom now on my five priorities will be ambition, ambition, ambition, ambition andย ambition.โ€

Corporate capture and Articleย 6

One of the most technical parts of the rulebook has been left as unfinishedย business.

Rules around โ€œvoluntary carbon marketsโ€ โ€” known as Article 6 โ€” were delayed because of obstruction from Brazil, which tried to water down efforts to stop โ€œdouble countingโ€ emissionsย cuts.

DeSmog UK reported that Article 6 is also one of the sections of the Paris Agreement most vulnerable to corporate capture. The CEO of IETA, a business lobby representing big corporations and fossil fuel companies, told DeSmog UK that the group was engaging in the negotiations under Article 6 and hoping to influence its outcome.

Lynn, of Corporate Accountability, said: โ€œWhile Article 6 has been stalled, the current text to be negotiated at COP25 [next yearโ€™s climate talks] reflects big polluters’ wishlists, not people’sย needs.โ€

Sara Shaw, co-coordinator of Friends of the Earth International, said: โ€œWe stand on the brink of catastrophe because corporate interests and fossil fuel money have infiltrated the climate talks to perpetuate the dirty energy system regardless of the cost for people andย planet.โ€

Radical action in the โ€˜realย worldโ€™

One of the most memorable part of this yearโ€™s talks was the presence of 15-year-old Greta Thunberg, who warned the conference that adults were behaving like children and that it was time for young peopleโ€™s voices to be heard.

โ€œWe have come here to let them [world leaders] know that change is coming whether they like it or not,โ€ sheย said.

Adow, from Christian Aid, said that โ€œthe most hopeful stories about climate change over the past two weeks have been from outside the walls of the summit,โ€ pointing to school strikes for climate action, grassroots movements mobilising around the world and the rise of Extinction Rebellion.

โ€œThe global transition is under way and cannot be stopped. The question is will governments help it go fast enough to help the worldโ€™s poorest on the front lines of climate change,โ€ heย added.

Lynn, of Corporate Accountability agreed, adding that more than 250,000 people and 300 organisations from 129 countries signed a โ€œPeopleโ€™s Demandsโ€ petition calling on world leaders to put people and the planet before corporate interests.ย ย 

โ€œWith the Peopleโ€™s Demands as our guiding light, the movement to demand climate justice has never been more united, organised or determined,โ€ sheย said.

You can read all of DeSmog UKโ€™s coverage of the UN climate talks here.

Image credit: Avaaz/Flickr/1.0

Related Posts

on

High demand for wild-caught species to feed farmed salmon and other fish is taking nutritious food away from low-income communities in the Global South.

High demand for wild-caught species to feed farmed salmon and other fish is taking nutritious food away from low-income communities in the Global South.
Analysis
on

Premier Danielle Smith can expect new tariffs, fewer revenue streams, and a provincial deficit brought on by lowered oil prices.

Premier Danielle Smith can expect new tariffs, fewer revenue streams, and a provincial deficit brought on by lowered oil prices.
on

Jeremy Clarkson spreads well-worn conspiracy theory that casts inheritance farm tax policy as plot to โ€œreplace farmers with migrantsโ€.

Jeremy Clarkson spreads well-worn conspiracy theory that casts inheritance farm tax policy as plot to โ€œreplace farmers with migrantsโ€.
on

Premier Danielle Smith declared sheโ€™s pursuing โ€˜every legal optionโ€™ in her fight against Trudeauโ€™s federal proposal to curb emissions.

Premier Danielle Smith declared sheโ€™s pursuing โ€˜every legal optionโ€™ in her fight against Trudeauโ€™s federal proposal to curb emissions.