Is Climate Science Denial Leading to Human Rights Violations, Asks Philippines Commission

authordefault
on

Byย Kert Davies, Climate Investigations Center. Originally posted on Climate Investigations Center.

As climate change liability โ€”ย who is to blameย โ€” increasingly lands in courtrooms around the globe, the Philippines Commission on Human Rights is taking a different and unique approach, investigating climate change impacts as a human rights infringement. The commission has held aย series of hearingsย this year to investigate the role of fossil fuel companies (also known as โ€œcarbon majorsโ€œ)ย in causing climate change, concealing climate science, delaying policy solutions, and facilitating the climate crisis of the Filipinoย people.

The most recent session was held in New York City on September 27-28, 2018, bringing together experts from a range of backgrounds including environmental law, human rights law, climate science, and public policy. ย The next session will be held in London thisย November.

Notably, no representatives for fossil fuel companies showed up at the New York hearing, though private law firms were apparently present in theย audience.

I was invited to present on the growing body of evidence documenting fossil fuel companiesโ€™ legacy of climate denial. I presented case studies on the following areas ofย research:

  • What we now knowย fossil fuel companies knewย about climate science decadesย ago
  • What those companies, their trade associations, and front groups did toย obstruct climate change policyย on the state, federal, and internationalย level
  • Evidence thatย fossil fuel companies paid millions of dollarsย to surrogate organizations and spokes-scientists to spread climate science denial andย misinformation.

Full presentation and follow-up questions from theย commission:

Referencing numerous โ€œhard to findโ€ documents now hosted on ourย Climate Filesย platform, our presentation covered multiple case studies of recent revelations of fossil fuel companiesโ€™ internal scientific investigations of climate change, dating back to the 1980s andย beyond.

Documents highlighted in the presentation provided specific evidence of corporate funding ofย climate denial campaignsย and entities that perpetuated climate science disinformation. The presentation outlinedย coordinated effortsย by corporate entities and their trade associations to oppose national greenhouse gas reduction measures and to destabilize the UNFCCC process. It also detailed CICโ€™s latest research on the increasing funding by ExxonMobil of denial campaigns and organizations from the late 1990s into the mid 2000s, funding which continues to thisย day.

Despite studying the science internally for decades, deploying their staff scientists to participate in the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) scientific review process, and presenting internal corporate briefings about the growing scientific consensus, documents show that oil companies were funding organizations saying things they essentially knew wereย false.

They were also simultaneously funding discredited โ€œcontrarian,โ€ย โ€œskeptic,โ€ย โ€œdenierโ€ scientists in order to counter the scientific consensus. For example, we presented a case study of aย 1995 documentย compiled by a Mobil Oil scientist, who knocks down each of the prevailing โ€œcontrarianโ€ scientists theories one by one, declaring โ€œthey do not offer convincing arguments against the conventional model of greenhouse gas emission-induced climate change.โ€ This was a private document that was never published by the industry group and was later revealed byย journalists.

The materials below include a PDF copy of the presentation and a bibliography of documents used in theย presentation.



Kert Davies Presentation to the Commission on Human Rights of the Philippines (Text)

Main image:ย In the aftermath of Typhoon Ketsana (Ondoy), a boy drags some possessions through the flooded streets of Metro Manila in 2009. Credit:ย Asian Development Bank,ย CC BYNCNDย 2.0

authordefault

Related Posts

on

The Alliance for Responsible Citizenship is the global far-right Woodstock, with political and thought leaders mingling with the business elite, conservative nobodies โ€” and me.

The Alliance for Responsible Citizenship is the global far-right Woodstock, with political and thought leaders mingling with the business elite, conservative nobodies โ€” and me.
Opinion
on

The 2025 World Ski Championships in Trondheim are an opportunity for the country to choose a cleaner path.

The 2025 World Ski Championships in Trondheim are an opportunity for the country to choose a cleaner path.
on

An official complaint slams MCC Brussels for failing to declare its funding, and warns that European democracy is under โ€œsevere attackโ€.

An official complaint slams MCC Brussels for failing to declare its funding, and warns that European democracy is under โ€œsevere attackโ€.
Analysis
on

The American refiner pitched a pivot away from Alberta suppliers ahead of President Trumpโ€™s trade war salvo.

The American refiner pitched a pivot away from Alberta suppliers ahead of President Trumpโ€™s trade war salvo.