Environmental campaigners converged on the Royal Courts of Justiceย in support of an appeal against the โexcessiveโ sentencing of three anti-fracking protestors, warning that the case could set โa dangerous precedent that punishes environmental protestors for theirย beliefsโ.
Dozens of campaigners carrying the red rose of Lancashire gathered in front of the court on Wednesday morning to show their support for the appeal case and denounced the sentencing of the three men asย โdisproportionateโ.
Last month, anti-fracking protestors Simon Blevins, 26, Richard Roberts, 36, and Richard Loizou, 31 were sentenced to 16 and 15 months in prison at Preston Crown Court after being convicted of causing a public nuisance offence.ย In July, the three men were arrested after they spent between two and four days on top of lorries that were making their way to the Preston New Road fracking site in Lancashire, where Cuadrilla Resources started to frack for shale gas onย Monday.
This is the first time campaigners have been jailed in the UK for anti-frackingย protests.
Like what you’re reading? Donate here to support DeSmog UK‘s journalismย todayย
The three protestors have to serveย half of their sentences in jail, with the remainder onย license.
A fourth protestor, Julian Brock, pleaded guilty at a separate hearing and did not faceย trial.ย He received a 12-month suspendedย sentence.
Seb Kelly, from the campaign group Reclaim the Power, who was protesting outside the courts this morning, told DeSmog UK: โWe are here because of the unjust imprisonment of our friends who took principled and non-violent direct action in protest to the undemocratic and dangerous fracking activities which have now started at Preston Newย Road.
โThis is a politically motivated conviction that has been served to actively discourage others from takingย action.โ
Kelly added that while some people had been scared and deterred by the prison sentence, many others were โenraged and galvanisedโ by theย case.
โI have never seen so much determination in the anti-fracking movement,โ heย said.
Credit: Chloe Farand/DeSmog UK
His comments were echoed by Anna Vickerstaff, a senior UK campaigner at 350.org, who said campaigners had received messages of support from anti-fracking protestors all around theย world.
โWhat we have seen is that this case has mobilised people to stop the fossil fuel industry,โ she said. โPeople see this not only as an issue of democracy and freedom to protest but also as part of a climate crisis and people are ready to standย together.โ
‘Excessive’ย Sentencingย
In a written submission to the Court of Appeal, Friends of the Earth, which is represented by legal firm Leigh Day and Matrix Chambers, argued that the sentence given to the three men breached the European Convention on Human Rights, including the right to freedom of thought and conscience, the right to freedom of expression and the right to freedom ofย assembly.
They are expected to argue that the judgeโs decision to treat the three menโs deeply held opposition to fracking as requiring the imposition of an immediate custodial sentences is contrary to the sentencing guidelines and legalย precedent.
Katie de Kauwe, lawyer at Friends of the Earth, said that an individualโs moral convictions on climate change or environmental protection โshouldnโt be used as factor to justify harshย sentencingโ.
โWe believe that the fracking protestersโ passion for the environmental was unlawfully used against them, resulting in incorrect and draconian sentences,โ sheย added.
The three men are represented by the human rights lawyer, Kirsty Brimelow QC, who is workingย pro-bono.
Like what you’re reading? Donate here to support DeSmog UK‘s journalismย todayย
The parents of Rich Loizou, Platon and Sharron Loizou, joined campaigners in front of the court before the start of theย appeal.
Platon Loizou told the crowd he was grateful to see so many people showing their support.ย ย
He said: โWe should not be here today. The boys went on a demonstration. There was no criminal damage, no intimidation, and weโve ended-up here. Itโs a disgrace and the government should be ashamed ofย itself.โ
Sharron Loizou also told DeSmog UK that they had been โso shockedโ at the sentencing and that although they were hopeful for the appeal to be successful, they had to be prepared for the โworst caseย scenarioโ.
Earlier this month, more than 200 academics signed an open letter calling for a judicial review into the โabsurdly harsh sentencingโ, adding it was setting โa dangerousย precedentโ.
The case is due to be heard by the Lord Chief Justice Sir Ian Burnett, sitting with Justice Phillips and Justiceย Cutts.
Cuadrilla has not issued any statement ahead of the appeal case beingย heard.
โGalvanisedโย Opposition
The fracking site at Preston New Road has become the symbol of the anti-fracking movement in the UK.
Protestors have opposed the plans to drill for shale gas for years but the campaign intensified after October 2016 when the government overturned a decision by Lancashire County Councilโs and granted Cuadrilla permission to frack two wells on theย site.
Green MP Caroline Lucas and Green Party co-leader Jonathan Bartley, who are long-standing opponents of fracking, joined protesters in front of the Royal Courts ofย Justice.
Speaking in front of the court, Lucas said campaigners had come to โcelebrate the principled position that those men took on behalf of all ofย usโ.
โThey are not criminals, they are heroes for standing up for our environmental rights. Friends, we know that the people who should be in court today are the politicians who are knowingly taking us towards climate chaos,โ sheย said.
Like what you’re reading? Donate here to support DeSmog UK‘s journalismย todayย
Cuadrilla began fracking in Lancashire on Monday a week after the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) warned that the world has 12 years to take โrapid and unprecedentedโ action to prevent dangerous levels of climateย change.ย
Leading climate scientists said that to avoid dangerous global warming, the world needs to move away from all fossil fuels, which includes shaleย gas.
โWhat is this government thinking of?,โ Lucasย asked.
โAs well as the climate vandalism of fracking, the [governmentโs] decision to go ahead with fracking was an absolute trumping of democratic rights. The people of Lancashire have made it loud and clear that they do not want fracking on their door steps. Well the government did not care much about the will of the people,โ sheย added.
Credit: Chloe Farand/DeSmog UK
In a previous statement, Francis Egan, CEO of Cuadrilla said the company was โdelightedโ to be starting its fracking operations and that the company was evaluating โthe commercial potential for a new sources of indigenous natural gas inย Lancashireโ.
Earlier this month, the High Court rejected a last minute legal bid by anti-fracking campaigner seeking an injunction to block Cuadrillaโ operations inย Lancashire.
Despite strong opposition from campaigners, energy minister Claire Perry has vowed to push ahead with the governmentโs plans to develop a fracking industry in the UK. Speaking on the fringe of the Conservative Party Conference, she described anti-fracking protesters as โa shouting fewโ.
She added that the fracking industry would help create jobs โin places which have been left behind for tooย longโ and described shale gas as โa precious and valuable assetโ for theย UK.
Image Credit: Campaigners in front of the Royal Courts of Justice inย London/@ChloeFarand
Subscribe to our newsletter
Stay up to date with DeSmog news and alerts