Brexit Pushing Ireland Towards US Fracked Gas, Putting Climate Commitments at Risk

authordefault
on

Environmental groups have united in opposing a massive new terminal that would receive fracked gas from the US in a protected area on Irelandโ€™s west coast. They fear the plan runs counter to Irelandโ€™s newly agreed climate commitments and is contrary to the countryโ€™s decision to banย fracking.

The public consultation on the proposal closedย yesterday.

Brexit fears played a key role in the reactivation of plans to develop a massive liquid natural gas (LNG) deepwater terminal in the Shannon estuary. Irish government ministers were alarmed that in a post-Brexit situation, LNG being piped into Ireland from the UK via interconnectors could be subject toย tariffs.

The proposed terminal, which would be capable of docking the worldโ€™s largest LNG carriers, is to include four massive LNG storage tanks, each with a capacity of 200,000 cubic metres. Some 23 environmental groups from Ireland, Germany, Belgium and the US have united to oppose the terminal, with the principal objection being that its principal source of LNG would be from fracked gas fields in the US.

Last year, Ireland became one of only three countries in Europe to introduce a total ban on onshoreย fracking.

According to Friends of the Earth: โ€œwe banned fracking in Ireland, it would be absurd to import fracked gas instead. It would lock us into fossil fuel dependence and blow our chances of containing climateย changeโ€.

Friends of the Earth added that the Irish planning regulator, An Bord Pleanรกla โ€œshould not extend the planning permission for Shannon LNG. The Government and the EU should not support or subsidise itโ€. Permission was originally sought for the project in 2008, but the original backer, the US investor, Hess, pulled out after wrangles with the regulators over compulsory contributions towards the cost of linking to the Ireland-UKย interconnector.

Some 99 percent of the total Irish gasย supply is currently imported via the UK through the two underseaย interconnectors.

Another anti-fracking group opposing the terminal, โ€˜Not Here, Not Anywhereโ€™ pointed out the โ€œquite hypocritical position that Ireland, having introduced a domestic fracking ban, thinks itโ€™s fine to import fracked gas from the USโ€, spokesperson Ciara Barry told DeSmog UK.

โ€œThe promotion of natural gas of any kind as a โ€˜transition fuelโ€™ is deeply flawed, and ignores for instance the highly damaging methane emissions associated with extractionโ€, Barry added. โ€œThis also locking us in to infrastructure with a 40-50-year life span, which makes any transition to a low carbon economy in the time scale needed completelyย impossibleโ€.

The spectre of Brexit has breathed new life into a once-mothballed terminal proposal. Among the strongest advocates for it has been Irish MEP, Seรกn Kelly. Largely due to his lobbying, the project has now been designated as a European Project of Common Interest. This means, crucially, that the project, with an estimated cost of โ‚ฌ500 million, may become eligible for investment from both the European Investment Bank and the Ireland Strategic Investmentย Fund.

โ€œThis project is not just an option, it is becoming an imperative Weโ€™re actually by far and away the most vulnerable of all the 28 member states in the EU nowโ€, Kelly told the Irish Examiner. โ€œThe countries that are vulnerable in terms of energy requirements across the EU are well advanced on plans to sort that out by building their own energy terminals but weโ€™re not doingย thatโ€.ย 

According to the NGO Food and Water Europe, The Shannon estuary, the proposed site of the LNG terminal, has been declared by the EU an Estuaries Special Protection Area (SPAEU-designated SPAs and has frequently faced EU legal enforcement actions on SPAs, most notably sensitiveย peatlands.

Campaigners against the LNG project point to the decision in November 2017, by BNP Paribas, a leading European and global financial services provider to โ€œno longer do business with companies whose principal business activity is the exploration, production, distribution, marketing or trading of oil and gas from shale and/or oil from tar sandsโ€.

BNP Paribas explicitly singled out โ€œLNG terminals that predominantly liquefy and export gas from shaleโ€ as being among the projects it would no longer provide finance for. This is a hugely significant shift, as major banks and financial institutions like BNP Paribas switch to: โ€œfinancing and investment activities in line with the International Energy Agency (IEA) scenario, which aims to keep global warming below 2ยฐC by the end of theย centuryโ€.

Irelandโ€™s energy and โ€˜climate actionโ€™ minister, Denis Naughten is understood to see the Shannon LNG project as an important tool in maintaining security of supply for energy, the Irish Examiner reported. Domestic political anxiety about Ireland being at the very end of a gas pipeline network stretching thousands of miles across Europe has been heightened by the political and economic uncertainties posed by the shambolic Brexitย process.

Irelandโ€™s largest coal-fired power station, the 915 megawatt Moneypoint facility is located just across the Shannon estuary from the site of the proposed new terminal. The Irish government is under pressure to exit from both coal and peat burning, and while renewables are now providing around a fifth of electricity production (with over 2,800 megawatt wind energy capacity), it still leaves major gaps in supply, with both gas and biofuels being touted in government circles as so-called โ€˜bridgeโ€™ย fuels.

The energy and environmental landscape has shifted significantly since the original Shannon LNG project was granted planning permission in 2008. Three years ago, the Irish parliament passed the Climate Action law to give effect to government policy of reducing Irish carbon dioxide emissions by 80 percent byย 2050.

A subsequent Energy White Paper adopted by government upped the target for the energy sector of cutting emissions by 80 to 95 percent by 2050. Campaigners point out that these ambitious but essential targets for decarbonising Irelandโ€™s energy system would be impossible to realise if costly new LNG infrastructure is locked into place for the next severalย decades.

A ruling on the public consultation that closed yesterday is expected in the comingย weeks.

Image: Photozou CC BYSA Updated 15/05/2018: The figure referencing 99 percent of Ireland’s supply was corrected to say ‘gas’ rather than ‘LNG

Get Weekly News Updates

authordefault
John Gibbons is a Dublin-based specialist writer and commentator on climate and environmental issues. He blogs at ThinkOrSwim.ie. You can follow him on Twitterย @think_or_swim.

Related Posts

on

The new leader of the opposition has regularly criticised the UKโ€™s green ambitions.

The new leader of the opposition has regularly criticised the UKโ€™s green ambitions.
on

Lucy von Sturmer and Duncan Meisel are building communities of creatives dedicated to preventing the advertising and public relations industry from casting polluters as climate saviours.

Lucy von Sturmer and Duncan Meisel are building communities of creatives dedicated to preventing the advertising and public relations industry from casting polluters as climate saviours.
Opinion
on

It's time to come together to collectively work through the anxiety, grief and overwhelm so many of us are experiencing.

It's time to come together to collectively work through the anxiety, grief and overwhelm so many of us are experiencing.
on

UCP pledges to abandon the provinceโ€™s net zero targets, and remove the designation of CO2 as a pollutant.

UCP pledges to abandon the provinceโ€™s net zero targets, and remove the designation of CO2 as a pollutant.