Coal Mine in Druridge Bay Rejected by Communities Secretary Sajid Javid due to Climate Concerns

picture-25876-1571179299.jpg
on

Communities Secretary Sajid Javid has rejected a proposed coal mine in Northumberland due to concerns over how the mine would fit with the UKโ€™s transition to a low carbon economyย and its impact on localย communities.

Campaigners have long argued against the mine, saying it does not fit with the UKโ€™s climate goals and would ruin the local tourist industry based around the Druridge Bay beautyย spot.

Earlier this month, Javid told campaigners he was delaying his decision without providing a reasonย why.

A letter from the Ministry of Communities and Local Governmentย to the company that wanted to build the mine, Banks Mining, states thatย Javid:ย 

โ€œโ€ฆ agrees that Green House Gas (GHG) emissions from the proposed development would adversely impact upon measures to limit climate change. He further agrees that most of the GHG emissions would be emitted in the short term, resulting in an adverse effect of substantial significance, reducing to minor significance in the medium term; and that Green House Gas emissions in the long term would be negligible, but that the effects of carbon in the atmosphere would have a cumulative effect in the long term (IR115).

โ€œGiven that cumulative effect, and the importance to which the Government affords combatting climate change, he concludes that overall the scheme would have an adverse effect on Green House Gas emissions and climate change of very substantial significance, which he gives very considerable weight in the planningย balance.โ€

Banks Miningย operates the Shotton and Brenkley coal mines in Northumberland. The company claims to mine around one million tonnes of coalย eachย year.

The Shotton coal mine is situated on theย Blagdon Estate, owned by hereditary peerย Matt Ridley. Ridley is an advisor to climate science denial campaign group, theย Global Warming Policy Foundation.

The Druridge Bay decision could still be subject toย appeal.

Banks Mining released a long statement in which it claimed Javid’s decision was to the detriment of local business and the UK‘s energy sector. Itย said:

โ€œThis is an absolutely perverse decision which flies in the face of the recommendation for approval given by Mr Woolcock, the Planning Inspector – the expert appointed by the Government itself to assess this scheme – after his careful consideration of all the facts laid out at the Public Inquiry, as well as the unanimous support we had for the scheme from an experienced, cross-party Northumberland County Council planningย committee.

โ€œIt has been made for purely political reasons and is totally contrary to the principles of local decision-making that previously appeared so important to Mr Javid.ย  The Planning Inspector’s clear and carefully-considered judgement was that ‘ย the national benefits of the proposal wouldย clearly outweighthe likely adverse impacts,’ย yet Mr Javid has chosen to flagrantly disregard this expert opinion from the comfort of his London office without ever having taken the time to even visit the area inย question.โ€

The company said it would โ€œcarefully review the precise reasons for the Secretary of State’s decision before deciding on the most appropriate next steps toย take.โ€

Campaigners were quick to celebrate Javid’s decision,ย however.

Isobel Tarr, a campaigner with Coal Action Network, told DeSmog UK:

โ€œSajid Javid rightly responded to a hard fought community campaign to save Druridge Bay. Now he must respond urgently to the residents near to Banks Groups’ other imminent opencast mine, Bradley in Country Durham, whose letter and 88,000 strong petition urged him to intervene before work startsย imminently.

โ€œLike Druridge, this is also a unique landscape and rich habitat. If the government is serious about meeting emissions reductions under the Paris Agreement it must put a stop to all new opencast coal mines,ย now.โ€

Rose Dickinson, Friends of the Earth campaigner, said in aย statement:

โ€œThis is a significant victory for local residents and the climate, it means an important step forward has been taken in ending the era of fossilย fuels.

โ€œThis is the first coal mine ever to be rejected in the UK because of climate change impacts โ€“ a vindication for everyone who has been calling for fossil fuels to be left in theย ground.โ€

Sam Bright, an environmental lawyer with Client Earth, said in aย statement:

ย โ€œWe congratulate the government for taking the only thinkable decision and blocking this new coal mine because of its huge future climateย impacts.

โ€œIt’s the first time ministers have blocked a project on climate change grounds. The tone is set: we expect authorities to take a similar approach from now on when considering fossil fuel developments in the UK.โ€

Image: Gareth Milner/Flickr CC BYย 2.0

Get Weekly News Updates

picture-25876-1571179299.jpg
Mat was DeSmog's Special Projects and Investigations Editor, and Operations Director of DeSmog UK Ltd. He was DeSmog UKโ€™s Editor from October 2017 to March 2021, having previously been an editor at Nature Climate Change and analyst at Carbon Brief.

Related Posts

on

The new leader of the opposition has regularly criticised the UKโ€™s green ambitions.

The new leader of the opposition has regularly criticised the UKโ€™s green ambitions.
on

Lucy von Sturmer and Duncan Meisel are building communities of creatives dedicated to preventing the advertising and public relations industry from casting polluters as climate saviours.

Lucy von Sturmer and Duncan Meisel are building communities of creatives dedicated to preventing the advertising and public relations industry from casting polluters as climate saviours.
Opinion
on

It's time to come together to collectively work through the anxiety, grief and overwhelm so many of us are experiencing.

It's time to come together to collectively work through the anxiety, grief and overwhelm so many of us are experiencing.
on

UCP pledges to abandon the provinceโ€™s net zero targets, and remove the designation of CO2 as a pollutant.

UCP pledges to abandon the provinceโ€™s net zero targets, and remove the designation of CO2 as a pollutant.