On the heels of Iowa and Ohio, Wyoming has become the third state to introduceย a bill criminalizingย the type of activities undertaken by past oil and gas pipelineย protesters.ย
One of the Wyoming bill’sย co-sponsors even says it was inspired by the protests led by the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe against the Dakota Access pipeline, and a sheriff involved inย policing those protests testified in support of the bill at a recent hearing. Wyoming’s bill is essentially a copy-paste version of template legislation produced by the conservative, corporate-funded American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC).
At the organization’s December meeting, ALEC members voted on the model bill,ย the Critical Infrastructure Protection Act, which afterward was introduced in both Iowa and Ohio.
Like the ALEC version, Wyoming’s Senate File 74ย makes โimpeding critical infrastructure โฆ a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than ten (10) years, a fine of not more than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000.00), or both.โ Two of the bill sponsors of SF 74, Republican Sens. Eli Bebout and Nathan Winters, are ALEC members.ย SF 74 has passedย unanimously out of its Senate Judiciary Committee and now moves onto the fullย floor.
ALEC‘s model bill, in turn, was based on twoย Oklahoma bills,ย HB 1123 and HB 2128. The Sooner State bills,ย now official state law, likewise imposeย felony sentencing,ย 10 years in prison, and/orย a $100,000 fine on individuals whoย โwillfully damage, destroy, vandalize, deface, or tamper with equipment in a critical infrastructure facility.โ As DeSmog has reported, the Iowa bill has the lobbying support of Energy Transfer Partnersย โ the owner of the Dakota Access pipelineย (DAPL) which runs through the state โ as well as that of the American Petroleum Institute and other oil and gas industryย companies.
ALEC brings together primarily Republican Party state legislators and lobbyists to enact and vote on โmodelโ legislationย at its meetings, which take place several times a year. Within differentย task forces at these meetings, corporate lobbyists can voice their support or critiques of bills, while also getting a vote. Those bills often then are introduced asย legislation in statehouses nationwide, as in this latest example inย Wyoming.
Hydraulic fracturing (โfrackingโ)ย in Wyoming has helped the state vastly increase its natural gas production and spurred pipeline build-out. However,ย multipleย studiesย in recent years have alsoย linkedย fracking-related activities around the small town of Pavilionย to groundwaterย contamination.ย
Credit: Center for Media andย Democracy
Targetingย ‘Ecoterrorism’
Wyoming’s bill, like the ALEC model bill and one of the Oklahoma bills, includesย language implicating any organization โfound to be a conspiratorโ andย lobbing a $1 million fineย onย any group which โaids, abets, solicits, encourages, hires, conspires, commands, or procures a person to commit the crime of impeding criticalย infrastructure.โย
State Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Leland Christensen, a Republican and one of the bill’s co-sponsors, said when he introduced the bill that legislative language was needed to hold accountable those โorganizations that sponsor this kind ofย ecoterrorism.โ
The fiscal note for the Wyoming bill says that the โfiscal impact to the judicial system is indeterminable,โ while also discussing the prospective costs of incarcerating people under the auspices of theย legislation.
โThe Department of Corrections states that the impact of the bill is indeterminable as there is currently no way to accurately estimate the number of offenders that will be sentenced pursuant to the bill,โ reads the fiscal note. โEach year of incarceration currently costs the state approximately $41,537 per inmate, including medical costs. Each year of community supervision costs the state approximately $2,000 perย inmate.โ
ALEC Modelย Confirmed
One co-sponsor of the Wyoming bill, its sole Democratic supporter, Rep. Stan Black, told WyoFile.com that the bill was inspired by what took place at the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation and that SF 74 wasย based on the ALEC modelย bill.ย
Shortly after ALEC members voted to adopt the Oklahoma legislation as a model bill, Oklahomaโs HB 1123 was alsoย adopted by the corporate-funded Council of State Governments (CSG) as a piece of โShared State Legislationโ (SSL) at its own annual meeting held just a weekย later.
One of the state legislativeย officials sitting on CSG‘s Committee on Shared State Legislation, North Dakota’s Republican Rep. Kim Koppelman, has a long history ofย involvementย with ALEC, andย throughout 2017 he spoke critically of the Indigenous-led movement against the Dakota Accessย pipeline.ย
ND Rep. Kimย Koppelman; Photo Credit: North Dakotaย Legislature
โOne of the major issues we dealt with was several bills introduced in response to the violent protests at the site of the Dakota Access pipeline,โ Koppelman wrote in a February 2017 article halfway through theย North Dakota Legislature’s session. โAs you may know, peaceful protests led by Native American tribes began this summer but they attracted others from throughout the nation and deteriorated into illegal occupation of sites on federal land, trespassing on private land, blocking of roadways and some incidents ofย violence.โ
At the beginning of 2017, Koppelman co-sponsored three pieces ofย North Dakotaย legislation, which crack down on pipeline protests. Two of them passed and are now stateย law.
The billsย โstruck a good balance to ensure everyone’s constitutional right to peacefully protest, which we cherish, but to provide for appropriate consequences when anyone crosses the line into anarchy, terrorizing or destruction of property,โ wrote Koppelman in his article. โThese bills have been fast tracked to give law enforcement the tools theyย need.โ
After DeSmog filed an open records request pertaining to Koppelman’s ALEC and CSG efforts in this area, he told DeSmog,ย โI have no documents or records concerning the subject of your request but, even if I did, you should be aware that, under North Dakota Century Code Section 44-04-18.6, communications and records of a member of the North Dakota Legislative Assembly are not subject toย disclosure.โ
In a follow-up email exchange,ย Koppelman told DeSmog that he โhad no role in bringing the billโ to CSG and does not know who didย so.
โFrankly, I don’t even specificallyย recall the bill you’ve inquired about, without going back to review it,โ Koppelman told DeSmog. โI also don’t recall who may have supported or opposed it at that meeting, either on the Committee or among the members of the public in theย audience.โ
For the ALEC bill, Koppelman also said he could not speak to its origins as a model or who has pushed it at the state-level since becoming a model.ย When asked by DeSmog if CSG records the Shared State Legislationย meetings or keeps minutes, Koppelman said that he does not believe so โbecause the result of meetings and the committee’s work is in the published volumeโ of Shared State Legislation which CSG disseminatesย annually.
CSG has in the past, though, kept meeting minutes of its SSL voting sessions, doing so as recently as 2014. Those minutes included an attendance list, which listed nearly three times the number of lobbyists present as state legislatorsย and showed industry attendees representing both the American Gas Association and the Consumer Energyย Alliance.
According to a letter obtained and published byย HuffPost, the ALEC model bill has also enjoyedย the backing of the American Gas Association, American Chemistry Council, American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers (AFPM), and Marathonย Petroleum.
Industry,ย Cops Pushย ALECย Billย inย Wyoming
According to a follow-up story by WyoFile.com, the Wyoming Senate Judiciary Committee had Wyoming Business Alliance lobbyistย Cindy DeLancey,ย rather than the lead sponsor,ย Sen. Christensen, introduce the bill in front of theย committee.
Before taking over as head of the Wyoming Business Alliance, DeLancey worked as a director of government and public affairs for BP, where she did โgovernment and public affairs support for the Leadership Team of the Lower 48 North Business Unit,โ according to her LinkedIn profile. DeLancey’s Wyoming Business Alliance biography also showsย that she formerly served as the chair of the Petroleum Association of Wyomingโs Government and Public Relations Committee. She did not respond to a request forย comment.
Wyoming Business Alliance steering committee members include representatives from theย Petroleum Association of Wyoming, Chesapeake Energy, Devon Energy, andย Jonah Energy. Petroleum Association of Wyoming leadership committees consist ofย representatives from companiesย such as Devon Energy, Chesapeake Energy, BP, Anadarko Petroleum, and other companies, while its board of directorsย listsย officials from those companies, plus ExxonMobil, EOG Resources, Halliburton, Williams Companies, andย others.
WyoFile.com has reported that, according to a document received from Sen. Christensen, the Petroleum Association and other oil and gas companies have also come out as official supporters of the bill, along with law enforcement representatives. The Wyoming bill’s official backers include the Wyoming Association of Sheriffs and Chiefs of Police, the Wyoming Business Alliance, the Petroleum Association of Wyoming, the Wyoming Petroleum Marketers Association, American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers (AFPM), Holly Frontier Corporation, Anadarko Petroleum, andย ONEOK.
According to a special events calendar obtained by DeSmog,ย theย Wyoming Business Alliance hosted a reception at theย Cheyenne Botanic Gardens on February 12, just days after Wyomingย bill SF 74 was introduced onย Februaryย 9.
On March 1, ALEC will also host a reception at theย Nagle-Warren Mansionย Cheyenne,ย according to that calendar, with invited guests asked to RSVP toย Wendy Lowe or David Picard. Picard currently has no oil and gas industry lobbying clients, according to his lobbying disclosures, but his lobbying firm’s website says he formerlyย did so for companies such as Shell, BP, and Marathon. He did not respond to a request for comment for thisย story.
According to lobbying disclosure forms, Lowe works as a lobbyist forย Williams Companies, a major pipeline company with overย 3,700 miles of pipeline laid in Wyoming. Lowe also formerly served as associate director of the Petroleum Association of Wyoming, according to her LinkedInย Profile.ย
Credit: Wyoming Stateย Legislature
Lowe, the private sector chairwoman for ALEC in Wyoming as of 2014,ย won the state chair of the year award from ALEC in 2012. She has alsoย previously received corporate-funded โscholarshipโ gifts to attend ALEC meetings as an official Wyoming representative, according to a 2013 report published by the nonprofit watchdog group Center for Media andย Democracy.
An ALECย newsletter fromย May 2011ย shows that, at an ALEC event Lowe co-hosted in 2011 in Wyoming, she praised the organization for โcreating a unique environment in which state legislators and private sector leaders can come together, share ideas, and cooperate in developing effective policyย solutions.โ
The Center for Media and Democracy also reported in 2014 that Lowe, a former Peabody Energy lobbyist,ย gave a presentation titled, โIncreasing Travel Reimbursement Incomeโ at an ALECย meetingย in Chicago in 2013. But Lowe told DeSmog that, although she attended the Senate hearing on the bill, she did not know about it until it was proposed and is not lobbyingย forย it.ย
National Sheriffs: DAPL Fullย Circle
At a state Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on the Wyoming bill, Laramie County Sheriff Danny Glick also came out in support of the legislation, warning that a situation similar to Standing Rock could happen inย Wyoming.
โOne of our Niobrara county commissioners already has graffiti going up โ โNo DAPLโ โ in that area up there,โย Glick said at the hearing, referring to the shorthand for the Dakota Access pipeline. Glick, an Executive Committee member and Immediate Past President of the National Sheriffs’ Association, was one of the most supportive sheriffs pushing what has been characterized as aย heavy-handedย and militaristicย reaction by law enforcement to the activism at Standingย Rock.
Under the direction of Glick, Laramie County sent officers to the Dakota Access protests under the auspices of the Emergency Management Assistance Compact (EMAC), triggered after North Dakota’s Republican Governor Jack Dalrymple issued an emergency order on August 19, 2016. Glick too, spent time at Standing Rock and spoke at a press conference alongside Morton County Sheriff Kyle Kirchmeier on October 6,ย 2016.
Laramie County Sheriff Glick. Credit: National Sheriffs’ Association Facebookย Page
Glick, who attended a roundtable meeting at the White House in February 2017 with President Donald Trump and other sheriffs, was also previously CC‘d on a set of emails obtained by DeSmog and Muckrock in which the National Sheriffs’ Association and public relations firms it had hired wrote talking points in an attempt to discredit those who participated at Standing Rock. Those talking points said to describe the anti-pipeline movement as rife with โanarchistsโ and โPalestinian activistsโ who used violence and possessed โguns, knives,ย etc.โ
‘Worst Instincts ofย Power’
Critics say the Wyoming bill could have far-reaching and negative impacts, if it becomes law, both in terms of criminal sentencing and for First Amendment rights. The American Civil Liberties Union of Wyoming, for example, has come out against the bill on bothย grounds.ย
Wyoming politicians have introduced anti-protest and anti-free speech legislation, Senate File 74. This bill is designed to shut down protests and activism. Contact your elected representatives today and ask them to stand up for the First Amendment! #WyLeg
โ ACLU of Wyoming (@ACLUWYO) February 20, 2018
The Sierra Club in Wyoming agreed, sayingย in an email blast that the bill is โexplicitly designed to crush public opposition to projects like the Dakota Access and Keystone pipelines, by preventing the kind of protests that occurred at Standingย Rock.โ
Even people representing industryย interests and within the Republican Party have come out against the bill as it currentlyย reads.
โThis bill appeals to the absolute worst instincts of power,โย Larry Wolfe, a Wyoming attorney who represents the oil and gas industry, said at a hearing about the bill, according to WyoFile.com. โWe the powerful must protect things that are already protected under existingย law.โ
Republican Senator Cale Case largely echoed the concerns put forward byย Wolfe.
โThis country has been through WWII, civil unrest in the 1960s and a heck of a lot more, but we didnโt need legislation like this,โ Case conveyed in an email to WyoFile.com. โGood laws already exist to protect property without this chilling impact on freeย speech.โ
Main image:ย On August 31, 2016, โHappyโ American Horse from the Sicangu Nation locked himself to construction equipment as a direct action against the Dakota Access pipeline. Credit:ย Desiree Kane,ย CC BYย 3.0
Subscribe to our newsletter
Stay up to date with DeSmog news and alerts