Why Has One of the World's Biggest Funders of Environmental Conservation Also Given $4 Million to a Climate Denial Group?

authordefault
on

The Pew Charitable Trusts, one of the worldโ€™s biggest funders of environmental conservation groups, has given almost $5ย million since 2011 to an organization that rejects the overwhelming evidence that human-caused climate change is dangerous, DeSmog hasย found.

Between 2011 and 2015, financial returns show theย Pew Charitable Trusts gave $4.7 million to the Texas Public Policy Foundation (TPPF), while giving millions more to dozens of worthy conservationย causes.

Kathleen Hartnett White, who is President Donald Trumpโ€™s nominee to lead the White House Council on Environmental Quality, heads TPPFโ€™s Armstrong Center for Energy and theย Environment.

Hartnett White, who hopes to chair the influential federal council, also rejects the science linking fossil fuel burning to dangerous climateย change.

Some of the groups that have received major grants from Pew have been outspoken in their criticisms of Hartnett White, describing her as a โ€œclimate change denierโ€ who was unfit for the role. The Pew Charitable Trusts confirmed the grants, but said they were unrelated to work on climateย change.

Senate Democrats are accusing Hartnett White of plagiarizing her responses to questions from the Committee on Environment and Public Works. Hartnett White was unable to answer basic questions about climate change during her nominationย hearing.

Backing Texas Public Policyย Foundation

In December 2016, TPPF co-hosted an energy summit where it gave a platform to several well-known climate scienceย deniers.

Among them was Professor William Happer, who has said the โ€œdemonization of CO2 โ€ฆ really differs little from the Nazi persecution of theย Jews.โ€

The TPPF was one of many conservative think tanks to have advocated for President Trump to leave the United Nations Paris agreement on climate change.

Hartnett White is also a member of the CO2 Coalition โ€” a climate science denial group that claims adding CO2 to the atmosphere will be beneficial. She wrote a โ€œstudyโ€ into the โ€œmoral case for fossilย fuels.โ€

Pewโ€™s most recent financial return shows it gave TPPF $923,000 to support โ€œpolicyโ€ work, but the form does not say what the money is used for. Pew has told DeSmog its support has been related to juvenile justice, adult sentencing, and dentalย therapy.

Pewโ€™s president and CEO Rebecca W. Rimel has described the values of the organization, saying they stem from โ€œa belief that progress springs from data, science, and factsโ€ and that Pew is โ€œcommitted to improving public policy, informing the public, and invigorating civicย life.โ€

In 2015, the trust handed out $118 million in grants to groups in the United States and around theย world.

Fossil Fuelย Apologists

Several groups accepting major grants from Pew are concerned about the impacts of climate change.ย Those include the Antarctic Southern Ocean Coalition ($612,000ย in 2015), Earthjustice ($482,000 in 2015), and the Natural Resources Defense Council ($296,000ย inย 2015).

In November, Earthjustice VP for policy and legislation Martyn Hayden attacked the Trump administration for nominating TPPFโ€™s Hartnett White, saying: โ€œFor an administration intent on burying progress on climate and clean air, she will be theย undertaker.โ€

Embed from Getty Images

In an October 2017 media release, the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) described Hartnett White as a โ€œfossil fuel apologist and climate change denierโ€ and said the Senate should block herย nomination.

NRDC president Rhea Suhย wrote:

โ€œWhite has a vision, all right, but itโ€™s terminally disconnected from reality, as her exhaustive writings make clear. Climate change, in her world, is not an existential threat but, rather, the ‘secular religion’ย of some conspiratorial ‘Left.’ Carbon dioxide isnโ€™t harming the planet, she avers, and we can all thank the coal, gas, and oil industries for everything from running water to humanย rights.โ€

DeSmog asked the Pew Charitable Trusts why it would give more than $4 million to a group whose work was in contradiction to the many other organizations it generouslyย supported.ย 

Pew did not answer this question, but in an email response, spokespersonย Felisa Neuringer Klubes said: โ€œI can confirm that Pew made grants to the Texas Public Policy Foundation totaling approximately $4.74 million between 2011 and 2015.ย Those grants were in support of the foundationโ€™s work to advance state-level policy reforms of juvenile justice and adult sentencing and corrections reform, as well as efforts to expand access to dental care by encouraging states to license dental therapists.ย The foundation is one of several hundred organizations that Pew partners with on a wide variety ofย issues.โ€

She added that the Pew Charitable Trusts isย โ€œan independent, nonprofit organization, committed to developing effective, evidence-based, nonpartisan policy solutions to solve todayโ€™s most challengingย problems.โ€

Main image: A screenshot featuring Texas Public Policy Foundation senior fellow Kathleen Hartnett White during a Senate nomination hearing in Novemberย 2017.

Related Posts

on

One of the sponsors of the UK pavilion has worked with major polluters to help them extract more oil and gas.

One of the sponsors of the UK pavilion has worked with major polluters to help them extract more oil and gas.
on

The Heritage Foundationโ€™s Project 2025 blueprint proposes sweeping anti-climate policies.

The Heritage Foundationโ€™s Project 2025 blueprint proposes sweeping anti-climate policies.
on

This story was published in partnership with Gen Dread and a video version will be available online on November 16 as part of the Climate Consciousness Summit 2024, staged by the Pocket Project in...
on

Campaigners say the European Commission has โ€œcompletely embarrassed itselfโ€ by offering โ€œflimsy excusesโ€ for taking oil and gas lobbyists to the flagship summit.

Campaigners say the European Commission has โ€œcompletely embarrassed itselfโ€ by offering โ€œflimsy excusesโ€ for taking oil and gas lobbyists to the flagship summit.