Trump Kingmakers Rebekah and Robert Mercer Attended Heartland Institute's Climate Science Denial Conference

authordefault
on

Standing in front of a crowd of influential climate science deniers and conspiracy theorists, Myron Ebell was in a triumphantย mood.

โ€œItโ€™s the people who have worked persistently against global warming alarmism that made this election possible,โ€ said Ebell, referring to the election of Donald J. Trump asย president.

Ebell was handpicked by Trump to lead the โ€œtransition teamโ€ at the United States Environmental Protection Agency and was one of a parade of speakers at the Heartland Instituteโ€™s conference in Washington, D.C. last week that included Republican Congressman Lamar Smith, chair of the House scienceย committee.

But arguably the most influential people hanging around the ballroom of the Grand Hyatt Hotel were billionaire hedge fund manager Robert Mercer and his daughter Rebekah.

Mercers Fundingย Climateย Denial

The Mercer family were key financial backers of Trumpโ€™sย successful presidential campaign, but were also key influencers in the makeup of Trumpโ€™sย administration.ย 

As key investors in Breitbart, the Mercers worked with that right-wing outletโ€™s former boss Steve Bannon, who is now Trumpโ€™s chiefย strategist.

The Mercer Family Foundation, led by Rebekah, has given heavily to climate science denial groups like Heartland. ย 

Their latest $100,000 donation, declared in the Mercer Family Foundation’s 2015 tax form, takes their financial backing of Heartland to more than $5 million since the first $1 million check was written inย 2008.

As DeSmog has reported, the Mercers have also donated to several of theย Heartland Institute conference sponsors,ย including theย Heritage Foundationย and theย Media Research Center, which has received more than $13 million from theย Mercer Family Foundation.

But as is the custom for Rebekah and Robert, they declined interview requests from journalists and stayed in the background of a conference characterized by no short measure of triumphalism mixed with some frustration that the Trump administration is not pushing even harder to pull apart regulations and rules tied to action on climateย change.

One recipient of a Heartland Institute โ€œlifetime achievement award,โ€ marketing professor Scott Armstrong, even compared the world of climate science deniers to the heroic firefighters of the 9/11 terrorist attacks in New York.

Myron Ebell’s Trump Transitionย Plan

Ebell, of the Competitive Enterprise Institute, was the man picked by Trump in September 2016 to prepare the EPA for his incomingย administration.

He told the crowd he had been asked by Trump to work out how to turn more than 40 Trump campaign promises on energy, climate, and the environment into policies, and then find ways to implementย them.

โ€œWe produced an advisory document that has no official status โ€” itโ€™s an official document and the title page has โ€˜Donald J. Trump Transition Team,โ€™ but itโ€™s confidential so I canโ€™t tell you whatโ€™s in it,โ€ heย said.

But then Ebell reminded the crowd of the campaign promises that he had been tasked with translating into legislativeย action.

These, Ebell listed, included pulling out of the Paris climate agreement, defunding the United Nationโ€™s Framework Convention on Climate Change and related climate programs, and withdrawing the EPAโ€™s rules to cut greenhouse gas emissions from power plants. Trump intends to do most of this through executive orders startingย now.

Ebell said withdrawing from the Paris agreement was a keystone measure that the Trump administration needed toย implement.ย 

Without it, he claimed that environmental campaign groups could use theย signing of the Paris agreement as leverage in court challenges to other anti-climate measures proposed by theย administration.

Rescinding the EPAโ€™s finding that greenhouse gases โ€œthreaten the public health and welfare of current and future generationsโ€ was another vital move, saidย Ebell.

Ebell revealed he was allowed to pick his own team at the EPA, and listed other career climate science deniersย like Steve Milloy and Chris Horner among the team who had done โ€œgreatย work.โ€

โ€œWe do have a problem,โ€ warned Ebell, telling the crowd that โ€œswamp creaturesโ€ were working hard to stop Trumpโ€™s promises from comingย true.

He said it was vital that Trump pulled out of the Paris accord, but was dismayed that former ExxonMobil CEO Rex Tillerson, now Secretary of State, had advocated for staying inside the United Nationsย agreement.

โ€œSecretary Rex Tillerson may be from Texas and he may have been the CEO of Exxon, but he is part of the swamp,โ€ heย said.

Anti-scienceย Foundation

As far as many mainstream media outlets are concerned, The Heartland Instituteโ€™s regular climate meetings โ€”ย described by one attendee as the Woodstock for climate science denial, and long referred to here on DeSmog as โ€œDenial-a-paloozaโ€œย โ€”ย have been treated with either ridicule, contempt, or ignored completely over the years.ย And for goodย reason.ย 

But this most recent meeting gained wider coverage, from the Washington Post to Science, which headlined the conference as a meeting of climateย โ€œdoubters.โ€

That so much interest has fallen on what could be described as an anti-science conference packed with ideologically driven fake experts, and that this conference attracted influencers like the Mercers, shows the rocky road ahead for climateย policy.

But what is clear and should neither be forgotten or normalized, is the phenomenon that underpins these relentless calls for rolling back policies to regulate greenhouse gas emissions while promoting further and sustained use of coal, oil, andย gas.

That phenomenon is climate science denial โ€” the rejection of half a century or more of scientific inquiry that came to the conclusion decades ago that humans are impacting the climate in ways that will detrimentally change the planet and everything that lives onย it.

Take another of the keynote speakers at this yearโ€™s conference โ€”ย Lord Christopher Monckton. ย Monckton was a speaker at a conference in Arizona in December alongside Professor Will Happer, a reported candidate to be Trumpโ€™s science adviser, and other fringe dwellers, including aย chemtrails conspiracyย theorist.ย 

The conference was organized by another conspiracy theorist, G. Edward Griffin, whose Freedom Force International group goes by a โ€œcreed of freedomโ€ which, among many other extremist positions, thinks people should have the โ€œfreedom to accept or reject any currency, or other forms of money, based entirely upon my personal judgment of its value.โ€ Happer was also a keynote speaker at the Heartlandย conference.

The foundation for the kind of measures being pushed by many in the Trump administration, and being advocated at the Heartland conference, is a rejection of modernย science.

Only by denying the impacts of rising levels of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, can you then push for an unmitigated expansion of the fossil fuelย industry.

Main image: A screengrab of Myron Ebell’s speech to theย Heartland Institute’sย conference in Washington DC.ย 

Related Posts

Analysis
on

The celebrity investor pitched โ€˜Wonder Valleyโ€™ with no committed investors, no Indigenous partnership, and about 27 megatonnes of projected annual emissions.

The celebrity investor pitched โ€˜Wonder Valleyโ€™ with no committed investors, no Indigenous partnership, and about 27 megatonnes of projected annual emissions.
on

City Council OKs private equity firmโ€™s purchase of Entergy gas utility, undermining climate goals and jacking up prices for the cityโ€™s poorest.

City Council OKs private equity firmโ€™s purchase of Entergy gas utility, undermining climate goals and jacking up prices for the cityโ€™s poorest.
on

With LNG export terminals already authorized to ship nearly half of U.S. natural gas abroad, DOE warns build-out would inflate utility bills nationwide.

With LNG export terminals already authorized to ship nearly half of U.S. natural gas abroad, DOE warns build-out would inflate utility bills nationwide.
Analysis
on

We reflect on a year of agenda-setting stories that charted the political influence of fossil fuel interests in the UK and beyond.

We reflect on a year of agenda-setting stories that charted the political influence of fossil fuel interests in the UK and beyond.