Southern Company Says Its Delayed Kemper Power Plant Not Viable as Coal Plant

authordefault
on
A massive coal gasification site under construction amid wooded areas
Southern Company's Kemper County coal plant with carbon capture system under construction in 2013. Part of the plant was demolished in 2021. Credit: XTUV0010, CC BY-SA 3.0

This is a guest post by Dan Zegart, originally posted on Climate Investigations Center.

In an apparent first salvo in a public relations campaign to shift blame for the Kemper power plant boondoggle away from himself and corporate management and onto state regulators, Southern Company chief executive officer Tom Fanning admitted this week that the Kemper plant is not economically viable as a coal-burning powerย plant.

The startling reversal came during anย earningsย call Thursday at a time when Southern faces intense scrutiny from federal and state regulators and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) โ€” and as its Mississippi Power Company subsidiary, the plant’s owner, faces a Moody’sย downgradeย over Kemper’s skyrocketing costs and failure to operate despite being three years past its promised operating date. ย Southern took a 27 percent hit to its fourth quarter net income thanks to Kemper scheduleย delays.

During the call, Fanning acknowledged that Kemper can only be feasible if it runs on natural gas as financial analysts questioned him about a just-released โ€œeconomic viabilityโ€ย studyย by Southern that found that low gas prices for the long-term mean the plant can’t profitably gasify lignite in the gasifiers Southern spent most ofย $7.1ย billion to build.ย ย 

Fanning called a โ€œreduction in the longterm gas price forecastโ€ an โ€œoverwhelming change, the big change. Obviously, there are others. It is a point in time. When we had this plant certificated, we all thought that gas prices were going to be double digits and there was some spread that were way higher than where we areย now.โ€

Fanning’s comments came as the company announced it will soon file aย rateย case with the Mississippi Public Service Commission (PSC) seeking to recover its costs for the plant.ย ย 

Although Fanning has often reassured Mississippians that they are protected by aย $2.88 billion cost cap agreement limiting their liability for the plant’s runaway budget, he has failed to mention that once the plant is declared operational, the cap won’t protect them from additional costs of some $4 billion. That includes $200 million a year in operation and maintenance costs, a disturbingly high figure that keeps going up for the novel โ€œclean coalโ€ย plant.

To investors, Southern often touts its friendly relationships with state regulators in the four states in which its regulated utilities operate, but the fall 2015 Mississippi PSC election quickly became a referendum on Kemper, replacing two commissioners who reliably rubberstamped Mississippi Power Company’s agenda with two new faces, Sam Britton and Cecil Brown, both of whom have pledged not to leave ratepayers holding theย bag.

A source close to the Public Service Commission told Climate Investigations Centerย recently that the PSC staff has run the numbers and that even under the cap, electrical rates could increase by 40 percent or more โ€” a catastrophic burden for Mississippi Power Company’s 186,000 disproportionately lower-income customers in 23 counties in southernย Mississippi.

Critics have noted that a natural gas facility comparable to the 582-megawatt Kemper facility would have cost about $500ย million.ย 

During the earnings call, Fanning did not draw the obvious conclusion and admit the plant will never actually use its twin gasifiers to produceย electricity.

In fact, while admitting the technology isn’t viable, Southern nevertheless claimed in its annualย reportย filed last week that it plans to have the plantย online with both gasifiers operating byย mid-March.ย 

Mississippi Power already faces three lawsuits over allegations that it misrepresented when the plant would be completed and how much it would cost during the project’s seven-year history.ย Those allegations, aired in a front pageย New York Timesย storyย last summer, are also the subject of a probe by the Securities and Exchangeย Commission.

An important prong of Southern’s PR strategy seems to be to shift the blame for Kemper onto the PSC itself. During the earnings call, Fanning also said, as he has frequently of late, that Southern built the Kemper energy facility because the Mississippi PSC wanted a coal facility as a โ€œhedgeโ€ against potential โ€œdouble-digitโ€ gasย prices.

However, documents obtained in a Freedom of Information Act request from the Department of Energy, which has provided a total of $407 million in grants for Kemper, demonstrate that the impetus for the facility came from senior management at Southern, including then-chief operating officerย Fanning, and from Mississippi Governor and longtime Southern Company lobbyist Haleyย Barbour, who pressured first the Department ofย Energyย (DOE), and then enlisted the secretary of energy himself, to pressure Mississippi’s three PSC commissioners into approving plans for the construction of Kemper.ย ย 

The documents also reveal that while possible gas price volatility wasย cited, Southern Company’s proposalย reliedย almost entirely on the plant’s promise as a test case for cutting CO2 emissions from burning coal โ€” especially lignite coal, a dirty, low-energy, but plentiful variety found in eastern Mississippi and throughout the world.ย ย 

Barbour was both governor of Mississippi and still actively lobbying for the company in early 2008 when he and Southern officials launched an all-out campaign to convince the Department of Energy to transfer an existing grant to build a 285-megawatt coal-fired power plant inย Orlando, Florida, to a new site in Kemper County, near the Alabamaย border.

Taking advantage of the availability of hundreds of millions of dollars from DOE‘sย Clean Coal Power Initiative, Southernย doubledย the size of the plant, added carbon capture and sequestration technology to the Orlando design, which used a first-of-its-kind technology developed by Southern Company and Kellogg Brown & Root (KBR) called transport integrated gasification (TRIG) to heat coal under high pressure in a reactor and turn it into a syngas similar to natural gas to drive a turbine to generateย electricity.

KBR and Southern hope thatย licensingย the TRIG technology in coal-reliant countries like Poland where lignite is common will help pay back developmentย costs.

This technology makes Kemper, for all practical purposes, a petrochemical plant, not a traditional coal-fired electric plant.ย TRIG uses a KBR process called โ€œcatalytic crackingโ€ that,ย according to DOE, โ€œhas been used successfully for over 50 years in the petroleum refiningย industry.โ€

Notably, however, it had never been used to generateย electricity.

Angling for a sizeable increase in support from DOE over what it received for its Orlando project, ย Southern tricked out Kemper with additional goodies.ย ย 

These included carbon capture equipment,ย plus a process to produce sulfuric acid from waste gases. The plan was to strip out the CO2 and connect the plant to an existing network of CO2 pipelines, then inject the gas into older, underproducing Mississippi oil fields to push up more oil โ€” a process known as enhanced oil recovery.ย ย 

In so doing, however,ย Southern now added further complexity and uncertainty toย the still-untested TRIGย system.

On February 6, 2008, Eric Burgeson of BGR, Haley Barbour’s lobbying firm,ย requestedย that then-Secretary of Energy Samuel Bodman meet with himself, Barbour, then-Southern CEO David Ratcliffe,ย other officials from Southern Company, and Mississippi Power officials to discuss moving and expanding the DOE‘s commitment from the Orlando project to Kemper.ย The initial cost projection was $1.2 billion.ย DOE wouldย put upย $270 million on top of $23 million spent in Orlando โ€” where the project was alreadyย substantially over-budget.

โ€œFront-end Engineering and Design (FEED) is underway to support operation in Kemper County in June 2013,โ€ Burgesonย wrote, although Southern later admitted that very little FEED had beenย completed.

Barbour had personally lobbied for Southern Company for more than a decade before he became governor and began representing it again upon leaving office in 2012.ย Despite the questionable ethics of a sitting governor working hand-in-glove with his own lobbying firm to reel in more than a quarter of a billion dollars in DOE money for Southern Company (Barbour defends himself by noting he put his 50,000 shares of BGR in a โ€œblind trustโ€ when he became governor), the meeting with DOE Secretary Bodman took place on Februaryย 26.

By the fall of 2008, a funding package of almost a billion dollars in DOE grants and federal tax credits was in place.ย By then the cost had already gone up to $2.4 billion and the schedule had been pushed back to spring 2014. DOE alsoย waivedย repaymentย obligations for what was supposed to have been aย loan.

To get the project rolling, however, Southern needed a โ€œcertificate of convenience and necessityโ€ from the Mississippi Public Service Commission to certify that the project was needed and allow construction toย begin.

However, the PSC voted against the project in April 2010, thenย reversedย its decision weeks later. In between, Barbour wrote the Commission urging approval, as did Secretary of Energyย Steven Chu. James Markowsky, head of the department’s Office of Fossil Energy, responsible for developing new coal technologies,ย wroteย several such letters to the PSC.

There are reasons to doubt that the current PSC, despite campaign promises to the contrary, will actually hang tough with Mississippi Power if the utility tries to stick customers with an outsized bill forย Kemper.

While neither of the new commissioners โ€” Sam Britton and Cecil Brown โ€” has made a public statement on the project lately,ย Britton’sย campaign managerย during his PSC run was Austin Barbour, Haley’sย nephew, and aย principalย in the GOP-focused Clearwater Group, whose other partner is Arnieย Hederman, former chairman of the Mississippi Republicanย Party.ย 

Though his gubernatorial term ended in 2012, Barbour himself was deeply involved in the PSC races, and is believed to have hand-picked Britton to run in the Southern District against Democrat Tom Blanton, who financed a series of legal actions that overturned an 18 percent rate hike by Mississippi Power to help pay forย Kemper.ย 

Britton is also connected to Barbour through his wife,ย Robin Robinson, director of organization, development, and corporate communication at Sanderson Farms, the third largest poultry producer in the country and a major Barbour financial and political backer.ย While governor,ย Barbourย appointedย Robinson to the board of trustees of the state’s Institutions of Higher Learning, which oversees public higher education.ย Brittonย spentย more than $300,000 on the campaign, an enormous sum for a PSC race, most of which came from his own pocket.ย Barbour is thought to have ageed to back Robinson for lieutenant governor in the next election in return for Britton spending so lavishly on his PSCย campaign.

All three commissioners have expressed concern that a too-tough stance on Kemper could bankrupt Mississippi Power, an unlikely scenario given past financial support by Southern for its troubled subsidiary. Asked about such a possibility during theย earningsย call,ย Southern’s Fanning said he believed that โ€œwe will maintain our support for Mississippi Powerโ€ and that it’s โ€œjust not in anybody’s interest to consider in any serious way something other thanย that.โ€

In his remarks to the analysts, Fanning leaned heavily on the argument that low gas prices had suddenly made the coal plant idea economically unsound.ย In fact, gas prices were trending far lower than Southern’s forecastsย whenย the project was approved by the PSC in 2010, and opponentsย arguedย as far back as 2009 that the plant as proposed was uneconomic given natural gas prices.ย ย 

When the PSC held hearings in October 2009 to determine if the state actually needed additional electrical power, the Sierra Clubย pointed outย that Mississippi already had 12 natural gas plants that sat idle 85 percent of the time and could provide up to 7,995 megawatts of power. Many of these were so-called merchant plants that were for sale for $500 million orย less.ย 

Later, in April 2012, when the PSC reauthorized its approval for Kemper, Louie Miller, director of the Mississippi Sierra Club, complained to a reporter that the project was again being rubberstamped by a compliant PSC, ignoring ultra-low gasย prices.

โ€œThere is no way they can justify Kemper under current conditions in the energy market,โ€ Millerย said.ย 

Main image: Mississippi’s Kemper County coal gasification plant.ย Credit:ย XTUV0010,ย CC BYSAย 3.0

authordefault

Related Posts

Analysis
on

The celebrity investor pitched โ€˜Wonder Valleyโ€™ with no committed investors, no Indigenous partnership, and about 27 megatonnes of projected annual emissions.

The celebrity investor pitched โ€˜Wonder Valleyโ€™ with no committed investors, no Indigenous partnership, and about 27 megatonnes of projected annual emissions.
on

City Council OKs private equity firmโ€™s purchase of Entergy gas utility, undermining climate goals and jacking up prices for the cityโ€™s poorest.

City Council OKs private equity firmโ€™s purchase of Entergy gas utility, undermining climate goals and jacking up prices for the cityโ€™s poorest.
on

With LNG export terminals already authorized to ship nearly half of U.S. natural gas abroad, DOE warns build-out would inflate utility bills nationwide.

With LNG export terminals already authorized to ship nearly half of U.S. natural gas abroad, DOE warns build-out would inflate utility bills nationwide.
Analysis
on

We reflect on a year of agenda-setting stories that charted the political influence of fossil fuel interests in the UK and beyond.

We reflect on a year of agenda-setting stories that charted the political influence of fossil fuel interests in the UK and beyond.