Pennsylvania Environmentalists Cite "Irreparable Harm" in Bid to Halt Mariner East 2 Gas Pipeline

authordefault
on

Soon after the Mariner East 2 natural gas pipeline received the green light from Pennsylvaniaโ€™s Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), three environmental groups appealed to stop construction pending further review. The groups claimed the pipeline construction activities, including tree cutting and horizontal drilling, could cause โ€œirreparable harmโ€ to landowners and the watershed along the projectย route.ย 

Last Friday Judge Bernard Labuskes of the stateโ€™s Environmental Hearing Board denied the request of the Clean Air Council, Delaware Riverkeeper Network, and Mountain Watershed Association to issue a temporary stay preventing Philadelphia-based Sunoco Logistics from startingย construction.

At that hearing, an attorney for Sunoco argued that tree-clearing to prepare the pipelineโ€™s route needed to happen before April 1, when state restrictions on tree-clearing take effect to protect the threatened Indianaย bat.

Labuskes said a full hearing on the environmental groupsโ€™ request would be held Marchย 13.

The $2.5 billion Mariner East 2 line will traverse Pennsylvania and carry natural gas liquids, primarily propane and butane, from the Marcellus and Utica shale areas of Ohio, West Virginia, and western Pennsylvania to an export terminal at Marcus Hook near Philadelphia. From there, most of the product will be shipped to a plastics factory in Scotland. For most of its 350 miles, Mariner East 2 will run parallel to the existing Mariner East 1ย pipeline.ย 

The project has been opposed by environmentalists and landowners concerned about safety and the companyโ€™s efforts to seize land via eminent domain.ย 

As the Philadelphia Inquirer reported, interactions with Sunoco left some rural residents long familiar with extractive industries in their region feeling unusually bruised, including Patricia Yevins, โ€œwhose 50-acre farm near West Middletown will be bisected by the pipeline after she lost her eminent-domainย case.โ€

โ€œNobody was against the pipeline completely,โ€ Yevins told the Inquirer. โ€œBut they should be required to playย fair.โ€

Map of Mariner East 2 pipeline route across Pennsylvania
The route of the pipeline across Pennsylvania. Credit: Sunocoย Logistics

Suit: Pipeline Application Stillย โ€œDeficientโ€

Over the course of two years, the DEP informed Sunoco of numerous problems with its application for Mariner East 2, including insufficient information for water crossing and earth disturbance permits, among other issues in each of the 17 counties that the pipeline would cross. Those issues, what opponents call โ€œdeficiency letters,โ€ plus an outpouring of public comments, have caused the company to push back completion of the pipeline from late 2016 to the third quarter ofย 2017.ย 

Alex Bomstein, an attorney for the Clean Air Council, said the DEP issued permits too quickly and that Sunoco still hasย not met the requirements that would protect landowners and theย environment.

โ€œFor one thing, [Sunoco Logistics] needs letters from municipalities in the pipelineโ€™s path saying whether itโ€™s in compliance with storm water and flood mitigation plans,โ€ Bomstein told DeSmog. โ€œSome of these letters still donโ€™t exist, and some municipalities wrote saying construction would violate theirย plans.โ€ย 

Also at issue are regulations that prohibit industrial activity in Pennsylvaniaโ€™s โ€œexceptional value wetlands.โ€ Aaron Stemplewicz, a staff attorney the Delaware Riverkeepers Network, told DeSmog that thereโ€™s no way for a pipeline cross these wetlands, which Mariner East 2 would, without degradingย them.ย 

โ€œSimply put, the pipeline will not comply with Pennsylvania regulations to protect the wetlands,โ€ Stemplewiczย said.ย 

Bomstein told DeSmog that there were so many problems with the pipeline application that his organization took more than 100 pages to document them. โ€œAny one of these would have been enough to deny permits,โ€ heย said.

At last weekโ€™s hearing, Margaret Murphy, an attorney for the DEP, refuted Bomsteinโ€™s accusation and said the department had conducted a thorough review and examined almost 30,000 public comments before issuing theย permits.ย 

When asked by DeSmog for comment, Sunoco Logistics spokesperson Jeffrey Shields would not address the allegations, but he did promote the pipeline as a jobย creator.ย 

โ€œBy keeping these natural resources in Pennsylvania for storage, processing and distribution to local, regional and international markets, Mariner East 2 offers Pennsylvania the opportunity to develop its own manufacturing economy rather than sending jobs and investment elsewhere,โ€ Shields wrote viaย email.

Municipalities in the path of Mariner East 2 have expressed strong opposition, citing the possibility of explosions, as well as, they say the companyโ€™s lack of attention toย safety.ย 

Last week, one municipality in the pipelineโ€™s path, West Goshen Township, filed a complaint with the Pennsylvania Public Utilities Commission, alleging Sunoco Logistics breached terms of a settlement reached in 2015 for the company to install two remotely operated emergency valves. To date, the township says, only one valve has beenย installed.ย 

Some Say Officials Succumbed to Politicalย Pressureย 

People marching at an anti-fracking protest in Philadelphia
Anti-fracking protesters at a rally in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, in July 2016.ย Credit: Suzanneย Bobosky

Pipeline opponents are asking why, if the company had not met all of the application requirements for Mariner East 2, did the DEP give it theย go-ahead?ย 

The answer, Bomstein told DeSmog, is politicalย pressure.

ย โ€œPennsylvania has become a petro state,โ€ Bomstein said. โ€œDemocrats and Republicans are interested in promoting shale gas industry and they donโ€™t like anything standing in theย way.โ€

Pennsylvania Governor Tom Wolf, who also has cited Mariner East 2 as a job creator, recently told a Pittsburgh radio station that he held DEP to a timeline but applied no political pressure to approve pipelineย construction.ย 

โ€œI asked them what their timetable was and then, letโ€™s do it,โ€ saidย Wolf. โ€œIf youโ€™re going to take four weeks, do itย in four weeks. Thatโ€™s not political pressure, thatโ€™s actually trying to manage anย organization.โ€

At least one of Pennsylvaniaโ€™s lawmakers are crying foul at the industryโ€™s efforts โ€” and political donations โ€” aimed at fast-tracking natural gasย pipelines.ย 

State Rep. Greg Vitali (D-Haverford) said in a recent news conference that industry money was preventing his colleagues from making โ€œgood publicย policy.โ€

โ€œI do think the system is rigged when you consider the influence of the drilling industry,โ€ said Vitali. โ€œIt is certainly not a level playingย field.โ€

A new analysis puts some evidence behind these claims. According to Marcellus Money, a project of Common Cause Pennsylvania and Conservation Voters of Pennsylvania, the natural gas industry donated a total of $464,592 to state officials in the first half of 2016. Those contributions were almost double what was donated over the same span inย 2012.

Since Marcellus Money began monitoring these numbers in 2009, it has documented the natural gas industry doling out more than $9 million to Pennsylvania political candidates and allocating nearly $60 million to lobby against regulations and incentives for cleanย energy.ย 

Study Shows Big Increase in Pennsylvania Methaneย Levels

The legal battle over Mariner East 2 comes as a Drexel University study reports a rapid increase in atmospheric methane levels in the Marcellus shale region in northeast Pennsylvania between 2012 andย 2015.

The studyโ€™s lead scientist, atmospheric chemist Peter DeCarlo, said in a press release that the methane increase was much more rapid than global increases and likely due to booming natural gas production there, primarily via hydraulic fracturing (fracking).ย ย 

While natural gas has been touted as a more climate-friendly โ€œtransition fuelโ€ by many, including former President Obama, a case has been building for some time that the climate impacts are not as small as previously reported for this fuel primarily composed of a potent greenhouseย gas.ย 

โ€œWith the increased background levels of methane, the relative climate benefit of natural gas over coal for power production is reduced,โ€ saidย DeCarlo.

Main image:ย A woman looks at a fracking operation that sits among many family homes. Credit: Suzanneย Bobosky

Related Posts

on

Campaigners say the European Commission has โ€œcompletely embarrassed itselfโ€ by offering โ€œflimsy excusesโ€ for taking oil and gas lobbyists to the flagship summit.

Campaigners say the European Commission has โ€œcompletely embarrassed itselfโ€ by offering โ€œflimsy excusesโ€ for taking oil and gas lobbyists to the flagship summit.
on

The new leader of the opposition has regularly criticised the UKโ€™s green ambitions.

The new leader of the opposition has regularly criticised the UKโ€™s green ambitions.
on

Lucy von Sturmer and Duncan Meisel are building communities of creatives dedicated to preventing the advertising and public relations industry from casting polluters as climate saviours.

Lucy von Sturmer and Duncan Meisel are building communities of creatives dedicated to preventing the advertising and public relations industry from casting polluters as climate saviours.
Opinion
on

It's time to come together to collectively work through the anxiety, grief and overwhelm so many of us are experiencing.

It's time to come together to collectively work through the anxiety, grief and overwhelm so many of us are experiencing.