Minister: Brexit and Trump Add 'Complexity' to Climate Plans But Won't Weaken UK's Commitment

picture-25876-1571179299.jpg
on

The UKโ€™s decision to leave the EU and the spectre of Donald Trumpโ€™s presidency will not stop the government delivering its emissions reduction plans, climate minister Nick Hurd today told MPs.

Speaking to the House of Commons Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy select committee, he said the current political climate meant ministers would have to make many difficult policy decisions. But he maintained that the UKโ€™s climate goals, entrenched in the Climate Change Act, remainedย unchanged.

โ€œBrexit is a complication in the sense that weโ€™ve got issues to think throughโ€, he said. These include whether the UK continues to negotiate as part of a European bloc in future negotiations, whether it continues with the EUโ€™s struggling emissions trading scheme, and how the UK participates in a unified European energyย market.

These are โ€œcomplex issuesโ€, Hurd admitted. But the government is โ€œultimately accountable to our carbon budgetโ€ rather than international, potentially changeable, targets, heย said.

Further details of how the UK plans to deliver these plans will be published by the end of March, Hurd promised. Ministers had previously promised to deliver such a report by the end ofย 2016.

The minister acknowledged that many decisions remained outstanding about how to retract EU regulations from UK law while retaining environmentalย protections.

โ€œIn the context of Brexit weโ€™ve got an opportunity to take stock again and look afresh at what we want to do through both the prism of national interest and in the context of the need to continue to influence the decisions that other people takeโ€, heย said.

But these are โ€œbig, complex, interrelated issuesโ€ that his department will need to address with the help of other ministers over the comingย months.

Trumpย Challenge

Brexit isnโ€™t the only challenge for the UKโ€™s climate policy. Donald Trump becomes US president on January 20th, and poses a โ€œvery big challengeโ€ to international climate plans, Hurdย said.

Nonetheless, Hurd said the international community had rallied to submit a โ€œstatement of solidarityโ€ at the latest talks in Marrakech, during which Trump won the US presidentialย election.

So it was too early to talk of โ€œcontingency plansโ€ to combat any US intransigence, the minister claimed, saying there was currently too much uncertainty around what Trump actually plans toย do.

โ€œWhen we see the reality of the plans of the Trump administration, which we donโ€™t know, no one knows, the international community has to respond. And we will be part of thatย response.

โ€œBut I donโ€™t think itโ€™s appropriate for us to talk about contingency plans in that context. Itโ€™s for us to fulfil our commitments to the British public in terms of making sure weโ€™re on track to meet our commitments at the lowest possible costโ€, heย said.

Speaking at the same committee hearing, Archie Young, the head of the UKโ€™s delegation to the UN climate talks, said the UK would have a significant role in trying to ensure the US continued to engage on the issue in someย way.

โ€œWe have a long history of working with the US on energy issues, on climate change issues, of administrations of various different colours where weโ€™ve agreed and disagreed more or less over theย years.

โ€œAnd I think as the Foreign Secretary has said to the house, we will obviously be hoping to continue to cooperate and making sure that we speak truth and that we explain our point of view, and that we work with the various parts of the US system so we can continue this movement as quickly and with as much robustness and rigour asย possible.โ€

Hurd also pointed to Chinaโ€™s apparent willingness to lead on the international stage in the absence of the US as a reason forย encouragement.

In the wake of Trump’s election victory during the Marrakech talks, โ€œwhat was very striking was that China came out of the traps very very quickly to send a signal of reassurance to the conference and to the world that theyโ€™re inโ€, heย said.

โ€œTheyโ€™re in for very pragmatic reasons because theyโ€™ve got serious issues at home in relation to air pollution, theyโ€™ve got very serious issues in relation to risk around food security and water security, so they are clearlyย in.โ€

So while Brexit and President Trump represent challenges to the UKโ€™s climate policy, Hurd remains confident the UK, with the support of a large coalition of other leading economies, will deliver on its own ambitious emissions reductionย plans.

Get Weekly News Updates

picture-25876-1571179299.jpg
Mat was DeSmog's Special Projects and Investigations Editor, and Operations Director of DeSmog UK Ltd. He was DeSmog UKโ€™s Editor from October 2017 to March 2021, having previously been an editor at Nature Climate Change and analyst at Carbon Brief.

Related Posts

Analysis
on

The celebrity investor pitched โ€˜Wonder Valleyโ€™ with no committed investors, no Indigenous partnership, and about 27 megatonnes of projected annual emissions.

The celebrity investor pitched โ€˜Wonder Valleyโ€™ with no committed investors, no Indigenous partnership, and about 27 megatonnes of projected annual emissions.
on

City Council OKs private equity firmโ€™s purchase of Entergy gas utility, undermining climate goals and jacking up prices for the cityโ€™s poorest.

City Council OKs private equity firmโ€™s purchase of Entergy gas utility, undermining climate goals and jacking up prices for the cityโ€™s poorest.
on

With LNG export terminals already authorized to ship nearly half of U.S. natural gas abroad, DOE warns build-out would inflate utility bills nationwide.

With LNG export terminals already authorized to ship nearly half of U.S. natural gas abroad, DOE warns build-out would inflate utility bills nationwide.
Analysis
on

We reflect on a year of agenda-setting stories that charted the political influence of fossil fuel interests in the UK and beyond.

We reflect on a year of agenda-setting stories that charted the political influence of fossil fuel interests in the UK and beyond.