Follow the Money Behind Attacks on Clean Energy in Ohio

authordefault
on

By Daveย Anderson

Fossil fuel and utility interests have used lobbyists and 2016 campaign contributions to influence state legislators in Ohio, and drive renewed attacks on clean energy policies in the Buckeyeย State.

State legislators will soon vote on companion bills โ€” SB 320 and HB 554 โ€” that wouldย effectively continueย theย controversialย freeze on Ohioโ€™s renewable energy and energy efficiency standards untilย 2020.

There has beenย no shortage of public supportย for unfreezing Ohioโ€™s clean energy standards, but behind the scenes, fossil fuel and utility interests have been using money to influence the debate inย Columbus.ย 

Utility, Coal, and Oil Lobbyists Are Behind Attacks on Clean Energy inย Ohio

According to disclosure forms filed with theย Ohio Lobbying Activity Center, a number of electric utility companies have paid their lobbyists to engage in โ€œactive advocacyโ€ onย SB 320ย and/orย HB 554ย duringย 2016:

  • American Electric Power (AEP)
  • Dayton Power &ย Light
  • Duke Energyย Dynegy, Inc.ย ย 
  • Exelon Generation Company, LLCย ย 
  • FirstEnergy
  • NRG Energy,ย Inc
  • NextEra Energyย Resources

AEPย andย FirstEnergyย have publicly backed efforts to freeze Ohioโ€™s clean energy standards before. And last year, Dynegy favored continuing the freeze inย testimonyย before theย Energy Mandates Study Committee. Other electric utilities have been relatively coy about their positions on SB 320 and HB 554 publicly, but apparently have not been shy about lobbying on the bills behind closed doors.ย ย ย 

Lobbyists for the utility industry have filed disclosure formsย populatedย with expenditures on meals and events for state legislators. For example, a bevy of FirstEnergy lobbyistsย disclosedย spending $1,068 for an โ€œRNC Receptionโ€ that all state legislators were supposedly invited to, during the same time period that they lobbied on SB 320 and HBย 554.

Lobbyists for several major fossil fuel companies have also lobbied on SB 320 and HB 554,ย including:

  • ExxonMobil
  • Marathon Petroleumย Corporation
  • Murray Energyย Corporation

ExxonMobil remains aย leading memberย andย funderย of the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), which has for several years peddled a so-called โ€œmodel policyโ€ written by the climate change denying Heartland Institute andย aimedย at rolling backย state renewable energy standards likeย Ohioโ€™s.

In 2014, Ohio Senator Bill Seitzย deniedย that SB 310, which froze the stateโ€™s clean energy standards through 2016, was influenced by ALEC. However, ALEC has since pointed to passage of SB 310 as one of theย few signs of successย for its campaign against renewable energyย standards.

Senator Seitz, who has now sponsored SB 320 to continue the freeze, remains aย memberย of ALECโ€™s board of directors. Seitz alsoย spokeย on a panel on โ€œRenewable energy mandates reformโ€ at ALECโ€™s 2015 Annual Meeting, which wasย sponsoredย by AEP, Duke Energy, and ExxonMobil. AEP has since joined the more than 100 corporationย that haveย left ALEC, but the company is still trying to implement ALECโ€™sย dirty energy agendaย inย Ohio.

Lobbyists for industry associations that represent fossil fuel and utility interests have also lobbied on SB 320 and HB 554,ย including:

  • Alliance for Energyย Choice
  • American Petroleum Institute โ€” APIย Ohio
  • Industrial Energy Users ofย Ohio
  • Ohio Chamber ofย Commerce
  • Ohio Coalย Association
  • Ohio Gasย Association
  • Retail Energy Supplyย Association

Attorney and lobbyist Samuel Randazzo has for yearsย ledย the Industrial Energy Users of Ohioโ€™s (IEU-Ohio) attacks on clean energy in Ohio. The groupโ€™s membership includes several utilities such asย Vendor Affiliatesย andย FirstEnergy Solutions. IEU-Ohio hasย promoted itselfย as an โ€œactive partner in shapingโ€ the SB 310 freeze on renewables and energy efficiency. And Randazzo has beenย calledย โ€œa chief guide on Ohio utility legislationโ€ by his law firmย McNees, Wallace, and Yurick, LLC.

Fossil Fuel andย Utility Interests Have Used Campaign Contributions to Curry Favor inย Columbus

According to Ohioโ€™sย campaign finance database, the primary sponsors of HB 554 and SB 310 have received 2016 campaign contributions from some of the same fossil fuel and utility interests that have lobbied on theirย bills:

Representative Ron Amstutz: primary sponsor ofย HB 554ย 

  • Duke Energy:ย $1,250
  • Ohio Coal Association:ย $500
  • Samuel Randazzo:ย $250

Senator Bill Seitz: primary sponsor ofย SBย 320

  • Dayton Power & Light:ย $1,000
  • Duke Energy:ย $3,500
  • FirstEnergy:ย $2,500
  • Ohio Chamber of Commerce:ย $350
  • Ohio Coal Association: $700ย ย 
  • โ€œMcNees, Wallace and Nurick by Sam Rondazzoโ€:ย $1,350**

Term limits prevented Senator Seitz from seeking another term in the Ohio Senate in 2016, but aย loopholeย allowed him to run for and win back his old seat in the Ohio House, where he willsoon serveย as Policyย Chair.

Earlier this year, PolluterWatch provided aย useful roundupย of the campaign cash that Senator Seitz and Representative Amstutz have previously received from fossil fuel and utilityย interests.

Campaign contributions from these same special interests have also helped to fuel the campaigns of the president of the Ohio Senate and the speaker of the Ohio House, as well as the majority caucuses for bothย chambers.

Senator Keith Faber:

  • AEP:ย $12,500
  • Duke Energy:ย $2,500
  • First Energy:ย $10,500
  • Ohio Chamber of Commerce:ย $1,850
  • Ohio Coal Association:ย $1,500
  • Samuel Randazzo:ย $1,750

Representative Cliff Rosenberger:

  • AEP:ย $12,500
  • Dayton Power & Light:ย $1,500
  • Duke Energy:ย $3,750
  • ExxonMobil:ย $5,000
  • FirstEnergy:ย $12,750
  • Marathon Petroleum:ย $6,500
  • Ohio Chamber of Commerce:ย $2,000
  • Samuel Randazzo:ย $1,000
  • Timken/TimkenSteel:ย $1,350

Ohio House Republican Organizational Caucus:

  • AEP:ย $18,500
  • Dayton Power & Light:ย $500
  • FirstEnergy:ย $18,796.51
  • Murray Energy:ย $17,500
  • Ohio Coal Association:ย $6,500
  • Samuel Randazzo (lobbyist for Industrial Energy Users):ย $5,000

Republican Senate Campaign Committee:

  • AEP: $16,000 on 12/31/2015 (basicallyย 2016)
  • Duke Energy:ย $3,750
  • FirstEnergy:ย $18,798.51
  • Murray Energy:ย $15,000
  • Ohio Coal Association:ย $5,500
  • Samual Randazzo:ย $1,000

Fossil Fuel-Funded Special Interest Groups Have Targeted Ohioย Too

Aย recent storyย in the Los Angeles Times provided an update on the funding behind two associated climate skeptic groups that have been involved in attacks on clean energy in Ohio. The American Energy Alliance (AEA) and Institute for Energy Research (IER) together received at least $3 million from the Koch network in 2015, according to the Times. The groups also have financial ties to coal interests, includingย Alpha Natural Resourcesย andย Peabodyย Energy.

Donald Trump has tapped Thomas Pyle, the president of AEA and IER, to lead his Department of Energy Transition team. The pick has fueled concerns that the incoming administration will pursue the same kind ofย ideological attacksย on clean energy that have impacted Ohio. Aย leaked memoย on Trumpโ€™s โ€œlikelyโ€ energy policies that was written by Pyle and obtained by the Center for Media & Democracy affirms those fears.ย ย 

Governor John Kasich, a Republican, hasย spoken outย against efforts to continue the freeze on clean energy in Ohio, telling reporters that he does not want to see the Buckeye State have to endure any moreย bad headlinesย on the issue. In fact, most states with renewable energy standards haveย chosen to standย by theirย bipartisan commitmentsย to clean energy, and reject theย disinformation campaignย funded by fossil fuel and utility interests. These states will continue to lead the way on clean energy, regardless of what direction the Trump administration decides to take onย energy.

The clean energy economy in Ohio is stillย heating up, despite the freeze. Policymakers in Ohio now have another chance toย embrace the factsย and reestablish their state as a true clean energy leader by rejecting SB 320 and HB 552.ย ย 

Dave Anderson is the policy and communications manager for the Energy and Policy Institute. This article was originally posted on the Energy and Policy Institute. Read the original.

Main image: Welcome to Ohio signย Credit:ย Andreas Faessler,ย CC BYSAย 4.0

authordefault

Related Posts

on

Is the Gulf of Mexico the "single best opportunity" to store climate-warming gas โ€” or an existential threat to wildlife and people?

Is the Gulf of Mexico the "single best opportunity" to store climate-warming gas โ€” or an existential threat to wildlife and people?
on

DeSmog reflects on some of the major moments in U.S. LNG policy, the courts, and protest in a turbulent year for this fossil fuel.

DeSmog reflects on some of the major moments in U.S. LNG policy, the courts, and protest in a turbulent year for this fossil fuel.
Analysis
on

Our editors and reporters weigh in on a year of seismic political events, and what theyโ€™re paying close attention to in 2025.

Our editors and reporters weigh in on a year of seismic political events, and what theyโ€™re paying close attention to in 2025.
on

A new lawsuit alleges toxic, radioactive waste leaked into a PA familyโ€™s water well, uncovering a regulatory abyss for miles of fracking pipelines in the state.

A new lawsuit alleges toxic, radioactive waste leaked into a PA familyโ€™s water well, uncovering a regulatory abyss for miles of fracking pipelines in the state.