Public pressure is mounting to decommission two 63-year-old underwater pipelines that rest in an environmentally sensitive waterway between Lake Michigan and Lakeย Huron.
About 540,000 barrels of oil and liquid natural gas flow daily through the 20-inch pipelines, called Line 5, which lie in an exposed trench on the public bottomlands of the Mackinac Straits west of the Mackinacย Bridge.
Built in 1953, Line 5 is now owned by the Alberta, Canada-based petroleum company Enbridge, Inc. Many fear the aging pipeline is an accident waiting to happen, withย recent modeling showingย a single oil spill could impact more than 150 miles ofย coastline.
Enbridge has been boasting about the findings of a state pipeline safety task force report released a little over a year ago that found no signs of internal or external corrosion on Lineย 5.
Criticalย Gaps
What the company doesnโt say is that even the authors of the report arenโt convinced of its validity, due to โgapsโ in information provided by Enbridge on its ownย pipelines.
โSubstantial questions remain and can only be resolved by full disclosure of additional information, and rigorous, independent review by qualified experts,โ the 2015 reportย reads.
In a press conference following the release of the report, Michiganโs Republican Attorney General Bill Schuette and Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) director Dan Wyant said Enbridge had not been forthcoming about the methods of pipeline integrity inspections performed by itsย contractors.
Enbridge says it continually monitors metal loss, cracks, and pipeline movements, and in some cases sends divers to visually inspect theย pipelines.
The company maintains the pipelines could operate safely for another half-century, though it acknowledges that a heavy crust of invasive mussels cover parts of theย pipelines.
Environmental groups claim these invasive species are likely corroding the pipeline coating.
Line 5’s Daysย Numbered
Enbridge has been trying to assure the public through a series of barbeques and community gatherings that Line 5 is completelyย safe.
Schuette said in 2015 that Line 5โs days โare numbered,โ and that the pipeline would never be built today under modern environmental standards. Gov. Rick Snyder promised to address recommendations included in the report quickly.
But critics say the state has been anything but quick to respond to the concerns about Line 5. A pair of independent studies that could lead to recommendations on Line 5โs future are planned but wonโt be completed until mid-to-lateย 2017.
โThe state has been studying (Line 5) since 2014, using data from the company,โ Sierra Clubโs Michigan Chapter Chair, David Holtz, tellsย DeSmog.ย
Holtz says an independent third party assessment of Line 5 would probably refute the companyโs claims that everything isย fine.
โThere is no real deadline for the state to do anything and no political will to confront the oil industry,โ Holtzย says.
Thisย 1953 photograph shows Line 5 under construction. Credit: Flow for Water/Bruceย Trudgen
Environmental lawyers say the governor and the attorney general have the authority to decommission the pipeline at any time as part of the 1953 easement agreement that granted the original owner of Line 5, Lakehead Pipe Line Partners, the right to occupy theย bottomlands.
Liz Kirkwood, an environmental attorney andย director of the Traverse City-based nonprofit Flow for Water, tells DeSmog that Michigan faces all of the risks from Line 5 and gets almost none of theย benefit.
She said, โThe state of Michigan agreed to never allow private interests to pollute public trust waters. Michigan has a heavy burden here because 20 percent of the worldโs fresh water is in lakes bordering theย state.โ
Direย Straits
Concerns were galvanized earlier this year when University of Michigan computer modeling was released showing that 152 miles of shoreline on Lakes Huron and Michigan were at risk from a single Line 5 oilย spill.
Environmentalists and citizens in the region bring up the companyโs 2010 pipeline break โ the largest inland oil spill in U.S. history โ as an example of what couldย happen.
In July, Enbridge agreed to pay $177 million, including $61 million in penalties, as part of a consent decree with the U.S. government tied to the companyโs 2010 pipeline rupture near Marshall, Michigan. The spill affected nearly 40 miles of the Kalamazoo River. Enbridge did not admit negligence in theย rupture.
In a poll released by the National Wildlife Foundation in May, nearly two-thirds of Michiganders said companies should not be allowed to operate pipelines running under the Greatย Lakes.
A majority of Michiganโs 12 federally recognized Native American tribes have passed resolutions opposing Line 5, and the Chairman of the Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians said Line 5 threatens the sovereign rights of tribal members to fish theย lakes.
More than 50 municipalities across Michigan โ liberal, conservative, and everything in-between โ have passed resolutions calling for all pipelines operating in the Straits of Mackinac to be shutย down.
Calls For Riskย Reduction
On September 14, the Oil & Water Donโt Mix campaign sent a letter to Michigan’sย Pipeline Safety Advisory Board co-chairs Heidi Grether and Valerie Brader, urging the panel to endorse four actions before an independent study commences. Their requests were to:ย ย ย
- Require Enbridge to shut down the flow of oil in Line 5 in the Straits during the winter months, when ice and strong currents make oil capture nearlyย impossible.
- Investigate at least eight alleged violations by Enbridge of easement requirements for operating Line 5 in the Straits, including pipelineย corrosion.
- Require Enbridge to hire an independent contractor to evaluate Line 5 before installing anchors that would keep the pipeline from popping out of itsย trench.
- Have the Michigan DEQ conduct a full environmental review of Line 5 under the Great Lakes Submerged Lands Act before issuing a permit to Enbridge to install 18 additional pipelineย anchors.
Those recommendations were brought up by board memberย Craigย Hupp of Grosse Pointe when the Pipeline Safety Advisory Board metย on Mondayย night, Septemberย 19.
But according to the Environmental Council’s spokesperson Andy McGlashen, most of the two-hour meeting was spent discussing how to ease public fears about the difficulty of cleaning up oil spills in the winter and just paid โlip serviceโ to the recommendations. โThe board basically said they didn’t have the technical expertise to evaluate those recommendations,โ McGlashen told DeSmog, adding that the board adjourned without a plan to find technical experts or take any action before its next meeting onย Decemberย 12.ย
Enbridge, like other companies operating pipelines, has pointed out that the alternative ways of moving oil โ by rail and by truck โ are even less safe, and that decommissioning Line 5 would ultimately increase the risk of oil spills orย explosions.
Holtz tells DeSmog he thinksย the companyโs line of reasoning is bogus, saying,ย โThere are other pipelines in the region that arenโt under water. Line 5 is just a shortcut. Line 5 is Enbridgeโs problem. It shouldnโt be Michiganโsย problem.โ
Main image: A protest sign at the site of the Line 5 pipeline s at Mackinac Straits. Credit: Flow for Water. Inset image: Mussles cover the Line 5 pipeline. Credit: University ofย Michigan
Subscribe to our newsletter
Stay up to date with DeSmog news and alerts