Canadian Climate Denial Group, Friends of Science, Named as Creditor in Coal Giant's Bankruptcy Files

authordefault
on

By Charles Mandel for the National Observer.

A Canadian climate change denial group has popped up in a U.S. coal giant’sย bankruptcy proceedings that have lifted the curtain on the funding of a sophisticated continent-wide marketing campaign designed to fool the public about how human activity is contributing to globalย warming.

Aย document, nearly 1,000 pages long, lists the Calgary-basedย Friends of Science Societyย as one of the creditors expecting to get money from the once-mighty coal company, Peabodyย Energy.

Climate scientists and environmentalists have long suspected that the so-called โ€œFriendsโ€ group was a front for fossil fuel companies trying to block government action to reduce carbon pollution, but Friends of Science members always declined to reveal their source ofย funding.

The bankruptcy documents show that the coal giant โ€” known for aggressively lobbying against environmental regulations โ€” had some kind of financial arrangement with their โ€œFriendsโ€ from Calgary. But when asked, the Calgary group’s spokeswoman said she wasn’t aware of theย connection.

โ€œThat would be news to us,โ€ wrote the Friendsโ€™ communications manager, Michelle Stirling, in an email response to a query about the funding fromย Nationalย Observer.

The document does not show the amount of funding provided, what it was for, when it was given, but only listsย creditors.

Stirling said she would need to review the document, which she believes was filed by a party other than Peabody, and said the filing could be a โ€œspurious attemptโ€ to connect the Friends of Science to the coal company: โ€œUntil I review the full document and check the source I can’t say muchย more.โ€

Coordinated effort to attack climate science, saysย Greenpeace

Keith Stewart, head of Greenpeace Canada’s energy campaign, said the documents provide proof of what industry has been trying to do to manipulate publicย opinion.

โ€œThere has been for decades a coordinated effort to attack climate science as a way to delay action on climate change,โ€ Stewartย said.

Peer-reviewed scientific evidence has demonstrated that human activity, mainly through the burning of fossil fuels and land-use changes, have largely contributed to warming temperatures on the planet in recent decades. Governments from around the world have also accepted that the science shows humans must move off fossil fuels in the coming decades to avoid irreversible damage to ecosystems and life onย Earth.

Friends of Science is made up of a core group of earth, atmospheric, solar scientists and engineers, as well as citizens โ€œwho challenge the catastrophic view of climateย change.โ€

The Friends group says it has spent a decade reviewing a broad spectrum of literature on climate change โ€œand have concluded that sun is the main driver of climate change, not carbon dioxide.โ€ The group was created more than a decade ago, using โ€œresearchโ€ accounts from the University of Calgary to finance its operations, including trips, wining and dining, for several years. But the university, which was issuing tax receipts to donors, later decided to shut down the accounts following anย audit.

They created their organization, kickstarted by a $175,000 donation from Talisman Energy โ€” another fossil fuel company โ€” to lobby against the Canadian government’s decision to ratify the Kyoto Protocol on climate change in 2002.* Friends of Science also ran a sophisticated public relations campaign, including advertising in the 2006 federal election that challenged the Liberal government’sย position.

A Friends of Science advertisement that appeared on public billboards. Image: Friends ofย Science

The court document also revealed that Peabody Energy owed money to many Americans groups that cast doubt on whether humans are responsible for the recent warming observed onย Earth.

The Centre for Media and Democracyย reportedย in mid-June that Peabody gave funds to a โ€œnetwork of individuals, scientists, non-profits and political organizations espousing climate change denial and opposition to efforts to tackle climateย change.โ€

Other recipients included Willie Soon, an aerospace engineer who argues sun spots and not CO2 is causing climate change, and who has previously received funding from ExxonMobil; and The Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT), whose recent film, Climate Hustle, contains misleading information about climateย change.

โ€œDerail the science and you stop theย trainโ€

The centre noted that the filings โ€œdemonstrate for the first time that Peabody Energy has financial ties to a very large proportion of the network of groups promoting disinformation around climateย change.โ€

Kert Davies, director of the Climate Investigations Center and one of the researchers who uncovered Peabody’s links to the U.S. climate denial groups, toldย National Observer:ย โ€œPeabody’s funding of groups like Friends of Science and others like CFACT shows a clear intent by the company to intervene in the climate public policy debate by casting doubt on the science. They know full well that science is the engine that drives environmental policy; derail the science and you stop theย train.โ€

โ€‹Description: https://ssl.gstatic.com/ui/v1/icons/mail/images/cleardot.gifThe revelation around Peabody’s funding of climate denial groups has sparked outraged reaction among Canadian scientists andย environmentalists.

Danny Harvey, a professor of geography at the University of Toronto, said: Peabody’s funding of the Friends of Science confirms that the latter group was in a conflict of interest and could not be believed. โ€œIt confirms what we knew all along. It’s not surprising atย all.โ€

Harvey, who is a past Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change lead author, noted that ExxonMobil isย currentlyย in hot water for climate change denial after covering up what it knew about the disastrous effects globally of an increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide from fossilย fuels.

โ€œI sort of suspect they would be doing something dirty like that,โ€ he said ofย Peabody.

Stewart, from Greenpeace Canada, added that the Peabody bankruptcy proceedings show that the coal industry is in decline because they failed to embrace the science and plan for the future by developing more renewable forms ofย energy.

โ€œThe coal companies didn’t see this coming in time and they went bankrupt,โ€ he explained. โ€œWhat we need to do now is make sure that oil companies in Canada see this so that we can begin the orderly transition to a climate-friendly economy rather than lurching in that direction through a series of bankruptcies and rearguard political actions like funding Friends ofย Science.โ€

Competition Bureau Proceeding with Friends of Scienceย Probe

At the same time,ย National Observerย has also learned that the Competition Bureau is moving ahead with an inquiry into a complaint against theย Friends.

The complaintย citedย the Friends for propagating false and misleading representations related to several billboards, website representations and a poster made available as a free download on a website. It also included The International Climate Science Coalition and the Heartlandย Institute.

Ecojustice, on behalf of a group of prominent Canadians (one of whom was Danny Harvey), filed the complaint with the Competition Bureau in December 2015. Charles Hatt, a lawyer with Ecojustice, said the bureauโ€™s decision โ€œvalidates the thrust of the application,โ€ something he finds particularly gratifying given the โ€œpush-backโ€ the applicationย received.

Michael Osborne, a partner in the Toronto-based legal firm of Affleck Greene McMurtry LLP, wrote a withering opinionย pieceย in theย National Post.

โ€œEcojusticeโ€™s complaint not only is not within the ambit of the Competition Act, it is a blatant abuse of the Actโ€™s six-resident complaint provision and an invidious attempt to deprive people of freedom of speech, which is not just protected by our constitution, but lies at the very core of our democratic system,โ€ Osborneย opined.

Hatt noted the Competition Bureauโ€™s inquiry doesnโ€™t come with a specific timeline and that it is conducted inย private.

* This article previously stated Canada ratified the Kyoto Protocol in 2003 rather than 2002. It has been updated to reflect the correctย year.

Image: Friends of Science billboard/Kenย Gregorie

authordefault

Related Posts

on

City Council OKs private equity firmโ€™s purchase of Entergy gas utility, undermining climate goals and jacking up prices for the cityโ€™s poorest.

City Council OKs private equity firmโ€™s purchase of Entergy gas utility, undermining climate goals and jacking up prices for the cityโ€™s poorest.
on

With LNG export terminals already authorized to ship nearly half of U.S. natural gas abroad, DOE warns build-out would inflate utility bills nationwide.

With LNG export terminals already authorized to ship nearly half of U.S. natural gas abroad, DOE warns build-out would inflate utility bills nationwide.
Analysis
on

We reflect on a year of agenda-setting stories that charted the political influence of fossil fuel interests in the UK and beyond.

We reflect on a year of agenda-setting stories that charted the political influence of fossil fuel interests in the UK and beyond.
on

The Heartland Institute, which questions human-made climate change, has established a new branch in London.

The Heartland Institute, which questions human-made climate change, has established a new branch in London.