Donald Trump Lays Out Disastrous Energy Plan, Denies Climate Science Again

authordefault
on

News flash: Donald Trump has proven again that he would be a disastrous President who would let our planet fry. Today, he added further insult to existing injury, launching a jaw-dropping energy speech that defiesย reality.

April 2016 set a record as the hottest April on record since temperatures were first recorded. Unfortunately, this was not a fluke; This has become the โ€œnew normal.โ€ April was the 12th consecutive month that broke monthly high-temperature records. In other words, the last twelve months have been the hottest months ever recorded for each respectiveย month.

The Democratic candidates that have run for Partyโ€™s nomination have all been on the same page in terms of accepting the scientific consensus that the atmosphere is warming up and that human activity is the biggest cause. But the Republican candidates, a pool that has been whittled down to include only Donald Trump, have consistently declared that climate change is aย hoax.

The New York Times explains Donald Trumpโ€™s previous comments about climate and energy asย follows:

Mr. Trump has said he would undo President Obamaโ€™s climate change policies, particularly a set of Environmental Protection Agency regulations to curb planet-warming emissions from coal-fired power plants. Of the E.P.A. itself, he has vowed โ€œto get rid of it in almost everyย form.โ€

He has said that as president, he would renegotiate the Paris climate accord, a global agreement committing nearly every nation to lowering greenhouse gas pollution. And, while demand for American coal has declined, he declared while campaigning in West Virginia, โ€œWeโ€™re going to get those miners back toย work.โ€

Not only could Trump prove to be a climate disaster because of his refusal to accept science, but his complete lack of political experience means that he is completely reliant on his advisors to develop his policy forย him.

This is troubling for the United States because Donald Trump has already appointed a climate change denier, Republican Rep. Kevin Cramer from North Dakota, as his top energyย advisor.

This week we finally got a peek at what Trumpโ€™s energy policy would be if he makes it to the White House when he gave a speech at the Williston Basin Petroleum Conference in North Dakota outlining his energy platform. As usual, his policies sounded more like a buzzword salad thanย actual proposals โ€”ย key phrases like โ€œenergy independenceโ€ and โ€œjobsโ€ were thrown out constantly in his attempts to pander to theย public.

Here is what we learned this week about what a Donald Trump presidency would lookย like:

  • Increased coal production, as Trump promised to put out-of-work coal miners back to work, blaming the decline on the industry on President Obama rather than a global decrease in demand.
  • The Keystone XL Pipeline will become aย reality.
  • Oil drilling and fracking will be given the go-ahead to increase activities both onshore andย off.
  • Remove any and all safety regulations that are in place to protect sensitive environmental areas and human health, and possibly dismantling the entire Environmental Protectionย Agency.
  • Repeal bans on selling U.S. oil to overseasย countries.
  • Increase offshore energyย exploitation.

In short, his proposals read like the talking points of every other fossil fuel-funded politician that has been in this position long before Donald Trump. More drilling, more fracking, fewer safety regulations, and less regard for theย environment.

While it would be difficult for a president to make these things a reality, Trump would likely have the benefit of a Republican-controlled House and Senate that would be more than happy to check these items off his to-do list. After all, every proposal that he has made are proposals that Republican politicians have proposed in the last fewย years.

But his speech didnโ€™t just focus on the need to become โ€œenergy independentโ€ and increase fossil fuel production.ย He also took a few shots at the clean energy industry as well, calling renewable energies like wind and solar โ€œtoo expensiveโ€ and specifically targeting windmills for killingย eagles.

He promised โ€œcomplete American energy independenceโ€ฆand lots of jobs, lots of jobs.โ€ Without laying out any specifics of how this will work, it is clear that heโ€™s reverting to the same method as other Republican politicians by simply throwing out a few testedย keywords.

He repeated the lies that the Keystone XL Pipeline would create โ€œ42,000 permanent U.S. jobs,โ€ in spite of the State Department claiming that the number of permanent jobs would be fewer than 40. He attacked President Obama for allegedly โ€œkillingโ€ the coal industry by creating unnecessary regulations that have closed down coal-fired powerย plants.

The next president will have to act on climate change because every day of further delay makes it that much more expensive and dangerous to address. And now that we have the Paris Climate Agreement with other countries stepping up to address climate change, the United States cannot afford to put a candidate in office that wants to not only dismantle that agreement, but who doesnโ€™t believe that climate change is even aย reality.

Partisan political gridlock and industry influence have held up meaningful climate action for too long in the United States, and another four years of inaction is not a viable option. Every record-breaking temperature month that passes is time that cannot be made up, and further proof that we are completely out of time to continue without addressing climate issues with the full support of the government.

Reactions to Trump’s energy speech from the environmental community wereย scathing:

NRDC Action Fund Executive Director Kevin Curtisย said:

โ€œDonald Trump today proposed disastrous policies that would ruin the environment. As president, he would put decades of environmental progress at risk and make it impossible to grow the clean energy economy we need to avoid the worst effects of global climateย change.โ€

Greenpeace Executive Director Annie Leonardย said:

โ€œNo deal, Donald. These proposed policies are nothing but out-of-touch love letters to the oil and gas industry. America needs a president who takes the climate crisis seriously, not someone who can only do what big business tells him to do. If voters wanted more of the same from the GOP, they would have voted for Jebย Bush.

โ€œTrump has been trying to run as an outsider, but his energy policies show heโ€™s just another fossil fuel shill. Heโ€™s offering stale ideas that could have come straight out of Dick Cheneyโ€™s diary. Americans know climate change is real. They want serious policies to tackle the problem, protect their future, and keep fossil fuels in the ground. Trump continues to reveal himself to be a shallow hoax on the Americanย people.

โ€œTrump can spend the next four months pandering to the fossil fuel industry, but we’ll continue the real work of building a more sustainable and justย future.โ€

Image via Headline Politics.

authordefault

Farron Cousins is the executive editor of The Trial Lawyer magazine, and his articles have appeared on The Huffington Post, Alternet, and The Progressive Magazine. He has worked for the Ring of Fire radio program with hosts Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Mike Papantonio, and Sam Seder since August 2004, and is currently the co-host and producer of the program. He also currently serves as the co-host of Ring of Fire on Free Speech TV, a daily program airing nightly at 8:30pm eastern. Farron received his bachelor's degree in Political Science from the University of West Florida in 2005 and became a member of American MENSA in 2009.ย  Follow him on Twitterย @farronbalanced.

Related Posts

on

Canadian environmentalist Tzeporah Berman makes the case for a "bold idea" to end the era of coal, oil and gas.

Canadian environmentalist Tzeporah Berman makes the case for a "bold idea" to end the era of coal, oil and gas.
on

High demand for wild-caught species to feed farmed salmon and other fish is taking nutritious food away from low-income communities in the Global South.

High demand for wild-caught species to feed farmed salmon and other fish is taking nutritious food away from low-income communities in the Global South.
Analysis
on

Premier Danielle Smith can expect new tariffs, fewer revenue streams, and a provincial deficit brought on by lowered oil prices.

Premier Danielle Smith can expect new tariffs, fewer revenue streams, and a provincial deficit brought on by lowered oil prices.
on

Jeremy Clarkson spreads well-worn conspiracy theory that casts inheritance farm tax policy as plot to โ€œreplace farmers with migrantsโ€.

Jeremy Clarkson spreads well-worn conspiracy theory that casts inheritance farm tax policy as plot to โ€œreplace farmers with migrantsโ€.