Climate Science Denier Patrick Moore Paid by Coal Lobbyists EURACOAL To Speak To EU Officials and Members of Parliament

R2uAVsWy_400x400
on

Europe’s coal lobby association EURACOAL paid for climate science denier Patrick Moore to speak to members of the European Parliament (MEP) and EU officials at an intimate dinner-debate last month, DeSmog UK can reveal.

As aย March newsletter sent out by the European Energy Forumย (EEF) details, Moore was invited as the main speaker at the dinner hosted by EURACOAL on 2 February in Strasbourg entitled โ€œClimate Demons or Climate Gods: Coal Industry Stakes Its Futureโ€.

An EEF press officer confirmed toย DeSmog UK that coal lobbyistsย EURACOALย invited Moore to speak.ย The Canadian climate science denier is known for promoting the idea that โ€œWe should celebrateย CO2 as the giver of life it isโ€.
EURACOAL describes itself as โ€œthe voice of coal in Europeโ€ and acts as an umbrella group forย associations and research groupsย across 20 countries.

When asked whether EURACOAL paid for Moore to present that evening, Brian Ricketts, secretary-general of EURACOAL, told DeSmog UK: โ€œYes, you are correct.ย ย EURACOAL did coverย Dr.ย Mooreโ€™s travel expenses from Canada and the time he devoted to preparing and giving his presentation to a small group in the European Parliament.โ€ย ย 

โ€œUnfortunately, I cannot disclose exactly what was paid [to]ย Dr.ย Moore as that would not be very professional,โ€ he wrote via email.ย โ€œHowever, it reflected c.5 daysโ€™ work for preparation time and long-haul travel.โ€
ย 
According toย Mooreโ€™s agentโ€™s site, it seems to cost between CAD$5,000 and $7,000 (ยฃ2,631 โ€“ ยฃ3,684) to have Moore speak at anย event.

Climate Ambition

The EEF, which organises events for industry stakeholders and MEPs, describes the dinner-debate on its website: โ€œWith COP21 concluded, the EU must make an important decision:ย to continue its high-ambition climate change agenda or to moderate its ambition. This decision will have a profound impact on the future of coal in Europe.โ€

However, Ricketts added that โ€œFor your information, EURACOAL gave no advice or instructions on whatย Dr.ย Moore presented or on what he said during the Q&A session โ€“ he was free to say whatever he wanted.ย ย So, for example, I donโ€™t recall him saying anything in particular about coal and lignite.โ€ย ย 

Among those in attendance at the February dinner wereย Paul Rรผbig, Austrian MEP and member of the EUโ€™s committee on industry, research and energy,ย Eero Ailio, deputy head of coal and oil retail markets unit for the European Commission’s Director-General for Energy (DG Energy), andย Jo Leinen, a German MEP.

MEPs are responsible for representing their city or region to the European Union, and when necessary, lobbying the European Commission on relevant issues.

Ricketts and Roger Helmer, an MEP for the East Midlands and climate science denier, were also at the dinner. They are pictured above standing with Moore.

Ricketts made headlines at the end of last year for hisย post-Paris statementย that the fossil fuel sectorย โ€œwill be hated and vilified, in the same way that slave traders were once hated and vilifiedโ€.

Inย a responseย to theย Guardianย articleย on his comments, Ricketts clarified EURACOAL‘s and the industry’s stance on climate change: โ€œWhile we do question the future potential of renewables, EURACOAL has no view on climate science. However, it is fair to say that many in the coal industry are climate sceptics.โ€

โ€˜Open Discussionโ€™

EEF states that its aim is to provide โ€œopen discussionโ€ between MEPs, industry, and others active in the energy sector ahead of decisions taken on energy related EU legislation so as to โ€œensure the decisions are based on accurate information reflecting a variety of points of view.โ€

Among EEF‘s members are at least 30 MEPs and oil giants Shell, BP, ExxonMobil, and Chevron along with Centrica, Lukoil, and Statoil. Trade associations and lobby groups, including EURACOAL, are also members.

And as the EEFโ€™s website describes, EURACOALโ€™s aim โ€œis to discover the truth behind climate scienceโ€.

Moore, however, believes that humans are not to blame for global warming and is known for promoting misinformation when it comes to the science of climate change. ย 

Recently Moore, who works at the Frontier Centre for Public Policy in Canada,ย appeared at the Paris climate conference with known US climate-denial groups theย Heartland Institute, theย Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT), and theย Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI)ย to hold a โ€˜counter-conferenceโ€™ to discourage action on climate change.

Moore also achieved fantastic notoriety after he claimed on camera in March 2015 that glyphosate โ€“ the active ingredient in Monsantoโ€™s Roundup herbicide โ€“ isย safe to drink.

Although a World Health Organization study had recently concluded that glyphosate is โ€œprobably carcinogenic,โ€ Moore boasted to the filmmaker: โ€œPeople try to commit suicide with it and fail fairlyย regularly.โ€ย But Moore refused to follow through on his suggestion by drinking a glass of the herbicide, saying โ€œI’m not an idiotโ€.

When asked to comment on his EURACOAL presentation Moore said: โ€œI consider DeSmog to be a hate site. So bugger off.โ€ย 

This isn’t the first time Moore has used offensive language against those he disagrees with. In October 2014, when Moore was speaking at Amherst College in Massachusetts, he described the students who walked out in protest asย having a โ€œTaliban mindsetโ€.

Mooreโ€™s Presentation

Moore’s EURACOAL dinner speech saw him promoting his โ€œcelebrate CO2โ€ catchphrase. He gave the dinner guests โ€œan unconventional interpretation of the whole climate and energy issue,โ€ as the EEF states in its newsletter.

And as a photo from the event shows, it appears the presentation he gave that night was similar to a speech given at the climate sceptic Global Warming Policy Foundationโ€™s (GWPF) annual lectureย last Octoberย in London entitled โ€œShould we celebrate CO2?โ€

Mooreโ€™s February presentationย is describedย as having โ€œfostered an inclusive policy discussion based on a broad scientific basis, questioning the selective use of science which, in Dr Mooreโ€™s view, has led in some cases to widely accepted myths.โ€

EEFโ€™s account of the dinnerย states that Moore told MEPs that โ€œthere is no definitive scientific proof that human emissions are the dominant influence on climateโ€ and that carbon dioxide in fact benefits the planet by increasing plant growth.

The myth that โ€˜CO2 is good for the planetโ€™ has been trotted out by the GWPF and its members several times.ย DeSmog UKย debunks this claimย hereย andย here.

โ€˜Options for Thinkingโ€™

Mooreโ€™s speech was followed by a presentation from Mark van Stiphout, deputy head of unit for new energy technologies, innovation and clean coal at DG Energy.

Van Stiphout argued that โ€œcoal is still an important provider of electricity in Europe,โ€ according to the March newsletter.

He also noted that โ€œresearch and investment are being encouraged to adapt coal to the increasing need for flexibility in power generation and to develop CCS [carbon capture and storage] solutions.โ€

According to dinner attendee and Austrian MEP Rรผbig, the nightโ€™s discussion provided participants with โ€œoptions for thinkingโ€.

EU Climate Targets

The EURACOAL dinner-debate was held in advance of aย meeting in Brussels on 4 Marchย where environment ministers discussed theย EUโ€™s next steps after theย COP21 climate summit.

In anticipation of this meeting, and another planned for 17-18 March, EURACOAL has urged the European Commission to implement a less ambitious climate target.

In aย 15 February statement, EURACOAL President Wolfgang Ceislik said: โ€œEURACOAL calls on President Tusk and all 28 EU leaders to reject the 40% target and to adopt a less ambitious, more realistic target that can deliver more for Europe.โ€

While the European Commission initially did not put forward a more ambitious climate target in line with the Paris Agreementโ€™s aim of reducing warming to โ€œwell belowโ€ 2C, last weekย Europeโ€™s chief climate negotiator, Artur Runge-Metzger,ย confirmedย that he is open to increasing the EUโ€™s carbon target for 2030.

This followed calls from ministers from 10 countries including the UK, Germany, France, and Luxembourgย for the Commission to increase its climate ambition. However, it isย unknown whether climate change will be on the agendaย for this week’s summit.
ย 

Photo from left to right: Ricketts, Helmer, and Moore via EEF.

R2uAVsWy_400x400
Kyla is a freelance writer and editor with work appearing in the New York Times, National Geographic, HuffPost, Mother Jones, and Outside. She is also a member of the Society for Environmental Journalists.

Related Posts

on

Lucy von Sturmer and Duncan Meisel are building communities of creatives dedicated to preventing the advertising and public relations industry from casting polluters as climate saviours.

Lucy von Sturmer and Duncan Meisel are building communities of creatives dedicated to preventing the advertising and public relations industry from casting polluters as climate saviours.
Opinion
on

It's time to come together to collectively work through the anxiety, grief and overwhelm so many of us are experiencing.

It's time to come together to collectively work through the anxiety, grief and overwhelm so many of us are experiencing.
on

UCP pledges to abandon the provinceโ€™s net zero targets, and remove the designation of CO2 as a pollutant.

UCP pledges to abandon the provinceโ€™s net zero targets, and remove the designation of CO2 as a pollutant.
on

Speaking at the UCP annual general meeting, the Premier took shots at the federal government and vowed not to โ€œbudge an inch.โ€

Speaking at the UCP annual general meeting, the Premier took shots at the federal government and vowed not to โ€œbudge an inch.โ€