What Do We Actually Know About Amber Rudd's New Emissions Reduction Plan Being Developed?

R2uAVsWy_400x400
on

All eyes are on energy and climate change secretary Amber Rudd and her team as they work to come up with a strategy to ensure the country meets its legally binding carbonย targets.

The โ€œfull detailsโ€ of a new emissions reduction policy will be revealed by the end of 2016, Rudd hasย confirmed.

Speaking at an Alderstage Group event ย in January she said there is the need for new policies to ensure that the UK will meet its post-2020 carbon targets. This was previously acknowledged in the new direction for UK energy policy in Novemberย 2015.

DeSmog UK reached out to DECC to find out more details on this plan. For example, which departments are they collaborating with?

But after more than a week the only answer we got from the press office was: โ€œWe are currently considering the right approach to reducing emissions in the 2020s and we will set out our proposals in full when we publish our new emissions reduction plan towards the end of 2016.โ€ย 

This still leaves us with a lot of questions.ย Who will be involved in developing this new plan? Will solar power and onshore wind factor in it at all? What impact will the oil and gas industry have onย it?

But weโ€™re getting ahead of ourselves. Letโ€™s start at theย beginning.

Why do we need a new emissions reductionย plan?

Under the 2008 Climate Change Act the UK has a legally binding goal of reducing emissions by 80 per cent by 2050. This target is based on a global goal of limiting warming to no more than 2C thisย century.

However, since this target was set weโ€™ve seen world leaders negotiate the Paris climate agreement which surprised many by raising this global temperature ambition. The agreement aims to keep warming โ€œwell below 2Cโ€ and promises to โ€œpursue effortsโ€ to limit the increase to no more than 1.5C. It also aims to reach net zero global emissions in the second half of theย century.

The UK also has a target of generating 15 per cent of all its energy from renewable sources by 2020 – an obligation which is legally binding at the EU level. This renewables target is not just for electricity but also includes energy for heat andย transport.

In November, The Ecologist obtained a leaked letter in which Rudd admits that the UK is set to miss its legally binding 2020 renewables target. While Rudd has acknowledged that the UK will meet its target of 30 per cent renewable electricity by 2020, she is โ€œconcerned about the work that is being done on transport andย heatโ€.

In the leaked letter โ€“ written to Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond, Oliver Letwin of the Cabinet Office, Greg Hands, the Chief Secretary to the Treasury, and Transport Secretary Patrick McLoughlin โ€“ Rudd revealed that the UK will only manage to get about 11.5 per cent of energy from renewables byย 2020.

A government update in January 2016, further confirms that it is unknown whether the UK will meet its 2020 targets. It reads: โ€œthere are a number of uncertainties which prevent the UK from providing estimates of surplus or deficits across the three energy sectors of heat, electricity and transport, beyond 2015/16 with sufficientย confidence.โ€

On 28 January the Committee on Climate Change (which advises government on tackling climate change) sent a letter to Rudd reviewing the UKโ€™s targets in light of the Paris climate deal. The letter states that current efforts to cut emissions by 61 percent by 2030 are the โ€œminimum levelโ€ required to meet the goals laid out in the Paris deal. (The government must set this fifth carbon budget target spanning 2028-32 in law before the end ofย June.)

However, the Committee also noted that longer-term targets to 2050 and beyond may need to beย strengthened.

What do we know about the emissions reduction plan soย far?

While details on this plan are vague at best, Rudd has confirmed that DECC has already started collaborating with other departments on the new strategy โ€“ although the names of these other departments havenโ€™t actually beenย clarified.

A reasonable assumption however would be that this might include the Foreign Office, the Treasury, the Department for Transport, and the Cabinet Office, along with the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills. Subsidiary bodies including the Coal Authority, the Oil and Gas authority, and the Office for Nuclear Regulation are also likely to be consulted. This assumption is based on the various issues to be covered under this new plan, any ongoing consultations on these issues (as laid out below), as well as the departments which Rudd chose to include in her leakedย letter.

The new emissions reduction plan is expected to build on the governmentโ€™s goal of switching from coal to gas in the power sector as well as rolling out a new fleet of nuclear power stations and increased investment in renewablesย capacity.

Rudd also said that new thinking is required for areas such as energy efficiency, greener heat, reducing industrial emissions and transport. In these areas progress has been โ€œslowโ€ Rudd admitted. She also emphasised that a key focus of 2016 will be โ€œlight[ing] the fire in innovationโ€ with regards to both technology and finance. โ€œWe must develop technologies that are both green and cheap,โ€ sheย said.

How is DECC is working to address theseย issues?

On 26 January 2016 Rudd responded to a letter in the Times on energy policy, clarifying the departmentโ€™s priorities, stating: โ€œWe are clear that a range of energy sources such as nuclear, offshore wind and shale gas all have roles to play in the low-carbon energy mix, powering our country and safeguarding our future economic security.โ€ It is therefore very likely that these three elements will play a significant role in any future emissions reduction strategy set out by the currentย government.

A final decision on the Hinkley C nuclear plant however has been delayed yet again due to funding difficulties. French newspaper Les Echos said EDF was struggling to find the cash for its 66.5 per cent stake and was now โ€œputting pressure on the [French] state, which owns 84.5 per cent of EDF, to come up with fresh fundsโ€. The decision is now set to come on 16 Februaryย 2016.

We also know that the government is very committed to developing the UKโ€™s shale industry with previous statements by Rudd saying that she will help to โ€œfast trackโ€ fracking and that gas plays a vital role inย decarbonisation.

On 15 December 2015, Professor John Loughhead laid out in a DECC blog that gas will also be vital is producing low-carbon heating. DECC minister Andrea Leadsom is also particularly vocal about her support for oil and gas. This month she said that โ€œIn 2030 oil and gas will still be a core part of the energy mix, providing 70 per cent of our primary energyย requirements.โ€

Interestingly, Leadsom also shed some light on her interpretation of โ€˜decarbonisationโ€™ when said the following on 18 January: โ€œI find it extraordinary that Labour Members seem to equate the deployment of renewables with decarbonisation. That is simply not the case. They fail to recognise that fuel poverty and endless renewables subsidies go hand in hand.โ€

Goodbyeย Coal?

This brings us to coal. Last November, DECC announced that the government will be phasing out all unabated coal fired power stations by 2025, and restricting its use from 2023.

However, this comes with the caveat that the government must be โ€œconfident that the shift to new gas can be achieved within the necessary timescales.โ€ And, according to Emily Gosden of the Telegraph, in January Rudd reassured a โ€œworried MP that flagship plan to shut down UK coal plants by 2025 is really just aย consultation.โ€

Itโ€™s also worth noting that this only rules out unabated coal. If any coal remains on stream, it would require carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology at scale. Yet, in November the governmentโ€™s CCS scheme wasย scrapped.

The department has also started working to address emissions in heat and transport according to DECCโ€™s January 2016 update.

On heat, funding will be increased from ยฃ400m in 2014/15 to ยฃ1.5bn in 2020/21. The government also intends to consult on proposed reforms to increase the cost effectiveness of the Renewable Heat Incentive scheme.

On transport, a consultation will be launched this year on increasing the amount of biofuels in transport. Any changes made on the back of this consultation however will likely not be implemented this year.

Innovationย Consultation

On boosting innovation, DECC has launched a new consultation inviting the energy industry to offer its views on how best to encourage innovation across the sector. This consultation will inform DECCโ€™s new Innovation Plan (something all departments are required to produce by spring 2016). The plan will address innovation-related activities of the Coal Authority, the Oil and Gas Authority, the Environment Agency and the Office for Nuclearย Regulation.

Specific areas of energy covered in the consultation document include: North Sea oil and gas, nuclear power, shale gas, heat networks, energy efficiency, and smart energy systems. Specific questions asked in the document include: (1) How can legislation and enforcement frameworks help support new technologies and business models to encourage growth? (2) How is new technology likely to shape the energy sector? (3) How can regulators better utilise new technologies to generate efficiency savings and reduce burdens onย business?

Finally, there are some things that most likely wonโ€™t be in this new plan, including an expansion of onshore wind power (covered in the Conservative Party election manifesto which pledged to โ€œhalt the spread of onshore windfarmsโ€ and โ€œend any new public subsidy for themโ€) and carbon capture and storage (recall, the ยฃ1bn competition was scrapped last November). A domestic energy efficiency strategy will also likely not be included in this specific plan as energy and climate change minister Lord Bourne said in January 2016 that this would not be delivered untilย 2018.

What about this mysterious โ€˜clean growthโ€™ย committee?

At the beginning of November 2015 the Financial Times reported that Prime Minister David Cameron had set up a new ministerial committee to address public concerns about air quality following the VW emissions scandal. However, this committee will look at more than just vehicle emissions, its remit will also include climate change and greenย energy.

It is known as the โ€œClean Growthโ€ interdepartmental committee and is chaired by Oliver Letwin, Minister for Government Policy (Cabinet Office). Others on the committee include Sajid Javid, business secretary; Liz Truss, environment secretary; Amber Rudd, energy secretary; and Transport Secretary Patrickย McLoughlin.

Beyond this, no one really knows what itโ€™s been upย to.ย 

On 19 January 2016 Labour MP Matthew Pennycook asked the committee how many meetings it has held since May 2015. Letwin responded in writing: โ€œThe Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster chairs an inter-ministerial group on Clean Growth, to consider issues relating to air quality and de-carbonisation where these have a cross-departmentalย aspect.

โ€œThe group meets as and when required, and members include ministers and officials from the relevant departments, including Defra, DECC, DfT and BIS. To protect the integrity of the policy making process, we do not comment on specific membership or the frequency and timing ofย meetings.โ€

A very similar description was given by Rudd in a January 2016 letter answering questions posed by Angus MacNeil, chair of the Energy and Climate Change Selectย Committee.

This letter came after Rudd was questioned by the Energy and Climate Change Committee about this new interdepartmental committee in December 2015 when giving oral evidence on the outcome of the COP21 climate conference.

Conservative MP James Heappey asked: โ€œFinally, for our information, you mentioned earlier on a cross-departmental working group that the Secretaries of State sit on also. Could you give us a bit more information on that? Is it a working group, a Cabinet Sub-Committee, who sits on it, how often does it meet, what is itsย authority?โ€

To this, Rudd responded: โ€œI think I will reserve my position on that. I am happy to say that this group exists and that we take the need to work across Government very seriously indeed, and will continue to do so to ensure that we work together to meet the targets that are the responsibility of the entireย Government.โ€

Heappey pressed further: โ€œSecretary of State, I apologise for coming back at you a third time but we have been conferring. I think we are nervous of our ability to hold you to account, and to hold the Governmentโ€™s policies on climate change to account, if we do not know who are the Secretaries of State involved in delivering this cross-departmental effort. Could you perhaps talk to your colleagues and then write to us, either to explain why it is we cannot know, or who is on the Committee, how often it meets and what its terms of referenceย are?โ€

Rudd responded: โ€œMr Heappey, I am as enthusiastic about transparency as you and the other members of the Committee are. I will indeed write you further information on it.โ€

Letwin continues to be cagey however. On February 3 during an Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee hearing on air pollution Letwin was asked how many times the cross-departmental committee has met. No precise answer was given beyond Letwin stating โ€œevery few weeksโ€. Letwin also described the Committee as โ€œnot intended to produce reports and pieces of paper, [it’s] intended to coordinateย actionโ€.

What questions do we still need toย answer?

–ย ย ย ย ย ย  Is the โ€˜clean growthโ€™ committee involved in developing this new emissions reductionย plan?

–ย ย ย ย ย ย  Will there be a formal consultation period on the new emissions reduction plan? Or, will all these separate consultations mentioned help inform the emissions reductionย plan?

–ย ย ย ย ย ย  Which departments are specifically involved in developing this new emissions reduction plan? Currently only best guesses can beย made.

–ย ย ย ย ย ย  From green NGOs to the fossil fuel industry, how do these different interest groups aim to influence this new plan and what outcome do theyย want?

–ย ย ย ย ย ย  What role will George Osborneโ€™s Treasury play in the planโ€™sย development?

–ย ย ย ย ย ย  Who will be consulted with to development this plan beyond government departments? Climate change experts? Industryย figures?

–ย ย ย ย ย ย  Are there meetings being held to discuss the plan? Whoโ€™s in attendance and how is this plan actually beingย developed?

Photo: DECC viaย Flickr

R2uAVsWy_400x400
Kyla is a freelance writer and editor with work appearing in the New York Times, National Geographic, HuffPost, Mother Jones, and Outside. She is also a member of the Society for Environmental Journalists.

Related Posts

on

UCP pledges to abandon the provinceโ€™s net zero targets, and remove the designation of CO2 as a pollutant.

UCP pledges to abandon the provinceโ€™s net zero targets, and remove the designation of CO2 as a pollutant.
on

Speaking at the UCP annual general meeting, the Premier took shots at the federal government and vowed not to โ€œbudge an inch.โ€

Speaking at the UCP annual general meeting, the Premier took shots at the federal government and vowed not to โ€œbudge an inch.โ€
on

One candidate has sworn off taking money from regulated companies

One candidate has sworn off taking money from regulated companies
on

Findings by InfluenceMap highlight mismatch between communication agencies' climate pledges, and their work on behalf of major polluters.

Findings by InfluenceMap highlight mismatch between communication agencies' climate pledges, and their work on behalf of major polluters.