Trustees of Lord Lawson's Climate Science Denying Charity Being Questioned by Charity Commission

R2uAVsWy_400x400
on
Series: Lord Lawson

Lord Lawsonโ€™s trustees at his climate science denying charity, the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF), are being questioned by the Charity Commission in relation to allegations that a member of its academic advisory board negotiated a donation from an oil company in return for publishing a report praising carbon dioxide, it was confirmed today.

A Charity Commission press officer told DeSmog UK: โ€œWe have a case open into the charity and are engaging with the trustees. We canโ€™t comment further at this stage.โ€

Last December, Professor William Happer, a member of the GWPFโ€™s academic advisory council, was contacted by a Greenpeace investigator posing as a representative from a fictional Middle East oilย company.

The Greenpeace investigation revealed Happer agreeing to write and publish a report for the oil company extolling the environmental benefits of carbon dioxide – and keep the funding of the work secret.

Following this, the Charity Commission confirmed it would incorporate these findings into its case on the GWPF, DeSmog UK reported at the time.

However, the Charity Commission has now clarified that the GWPF is not currently under investigation (a term which the commission uses to refer to statutory inquiries).

Rather, it has an open case into the GWPF which is โ€œaimed at ensuring trustees address any failures and weaknesses in their charitiesโ€™ย management.โ€

R2uAVsWy_400x400
Kyla is a freelance writer and editor with work appearing in the New York Times, National Geographic, HuffPost, Mother Jones, and Outside. She is also a member of the Society for Environmental Journalists.

Related Posts

on

The worldโ€™s largest outdoor advertising company warned city councillors of โ€œfar-reaching consequencesโ€ hours before the landmark vote.

The worldโ€™s largest outdoor advertising company warned city councillors of โ€œfar-reaching consequencesโ€ hours before the landmark vote.
on

For decades, ExxonMobil argued consumers, not oil giants, should take responsibility for fossil fuel pollution. Itโ€™s now backing Carbon Measuresโ€™ accounting scheme, which moves pollution โ€œliabilitiesโ€ to buyersโ€™ books.

For decades, ExxonMobil argued consumers, not oil giants, should take responsibility for fossil fuel pollution. Itโ€™s now backing Carbon Measuresโ€™ accounting scheme, which moves pollution โ€œliabilitiesโ€ to buyersโ€™ books.
Analysis
on

For some separatists, ignoring Indigenous rights is not only a side effect of an independent Alberta, but an explicit goal.

For some separatists, ignoring Indigenous rights is not only a side effect of an independent Alberta, but an explicit goal.
Opinion
on

Democratic innovation as a pathway for revitalising global climate action.

Democratic innovation as a pathway for revitalising global climate action.