Obama Slams Climate Deniers in State of the Union, Vague On Details For Action

1-DSC09675
on

In his final State of the Union address, President Obama made climate change one of the major themes of the evening, ridiculing those who would deny that climate change is a problem โ€” and one that can be addressed through curbing greenhouse gas emissions from humanย activities.

โ€œLook, if anybody still wants to dispute the science around climate change, have at it,โ€ the President said in his prepared remarks. โ€œYouโ€™ll be pretty lonely, because youโ€™ll be debating our military, most of Americaโ€™s business leaders, the majority of the American people, almost the entire scientific community, and 200 nations around the world who agree itโ€™s a problem and intend to solveย it.โ€

The President drew parallels between the difficulties of slashing climate change and one of the most famous scientific and engineering challenges in American history, the race to put a man on theย moon.

โ€œSixty years ago when the Russians beat us into space, we did not deny Sputnik was up there,โ€ he said, to laughter from the gathered members of Congress and other federal officials. โ€œWe did not argue about the science or shrink our research and development budget. We built a space program almost overnight, and 12 years later we were walking on theย moon.โ€

And while he bragged about today’s low gasoline prices, he also warned that a fundamental shift away from fossil fuels is needed โ€” andย fast.

โ€œNow weโ€™ve got to accelerate the transition away from dirty energy,โ€ he said. โ€œRather than subsidize the past, we should invest in the future โ€” especially in communities that rely on fossil fuels. Thatโ€™s why Iโ€™m going to push to change the way we manage our oil and coal resources, so that they better reflect the costs they impose on taxpayers and our planet. That way, we put money back into those communities and put tens of thousands of Americans to work building a 21st century transportationย system.โ€

Unlike years past, the President made no mention of the shale drilling rush that swept the U.S. during his time in office,ย  nor of the fracking that made shale drilling possible. And he made no claims about so-called โ€œclean coal.โ€ This year, he focused instead on the achievements of the wind and solarย industry.

โ€œSeven years ago, we made the single biggest investment in clean energy in our history,โ€ he said. โ€œHere are the results. In fields from Iowa to Texas, wind power is now cheaper than dirtier, conventional power. On rooftops from Arizona to New York, solar is saving Americans tens of millions of dollars a year on their energy bills, and employs more Americans than coalโ€”in jobs that pay better thanย average.โ€

But for all of the resounding rhetoric, the devil is always in the details when politicians are talking. And the President’s soaring speech was noteworthy for its lack ofย specifics.

The Obama administration โ€” both in the President’s remarks and through the White House’s State of the Union websiteย โ€” focused largely on policies that have already been enacted, rather than calling on Congress to enact new programs or announcing executive orders. And those existing policies were enacted at a time when the President was calling for an โ€œall of the aboveโ€ approach to energy โ€” which meant a heavy continued reliance on fossilย fuels.

For months, observers have noted that, while Obama seems to be increasingly aware of the perils of climate change, his administration’s policies have failed to keepย pace.

โ€œSo heโ€™s doing a very good job of showing us what a climate leader sounds like,โ€ Naomi Klein, author of This Changes Everything: Capitalism Versus the Climate, told Democracy Now in August. โ€œBut Iโ€™m afraid weโ€™ve got a long way to go before we see what a climate leader acts like, because there is a huge gap between what Obama is saying about this threat, about it being the greatest threat of our time, and indeed this being our last window in which we can take action to prevent truly catastrophic climate change, but the measures that have been unveiled are simplyย inadequate.โ€

And while Obama’s ire focused on the oil and coal industries, he failed to address the role of the natural gas industry and its methane emissions, which risk pushing the climate into runaway feedback loops โ€” an issue so serious that scientists warn that burning gas instead of coal to generate electricity is worse for the climate than burningย coal.

Even while the President spoke, methane continued to spew from a gas storage field in Southern California, a leak that has driven thousands from their homes and that environmentalist Erin Brockovich has compared to the BP oil spill for itsย immensity.ย ย 

There’s also the issue of convincing Congress to go along with a shift away from an industry that donated over $326 million to the 113th Congress (the most recent year for which figures are available), according to Oil Changeย International.

โ€œI think there are outdated regulations that need to be changed, and thereโ€™s red tape that needs to be cut,โ€ the President said, to some of the loudest applause of theย evening.

His next sentence drew a far more muted response. โ€œBut after years of record corporate profits, working families wonโ€™t get more opportunity or bigger paychecks by letting big banks or big oil or hedge funds make their own rules at the expense of everyone else.โ€
ย 

Video Credit: PBS Newshour, via YouTube.

1-DSC09675
Sharon Kelly is an attorney and investigative reporter based in Pennsylvania. She was previously a senior correspondent at The Capitol Forum and, prior to that, she reported for The New York Times, The Guardian, The Nation, Earth Island Journal, and a variety of other print and online publications.

Related Posts

on

Policymakers and industry say the Midwest Hydrogen Hub will create green jobs and slash emissions, but environmentalists see a ploy to keep fossil fuels in use.

Policymakers and industry say the Midwest Hydrogen Hub will create green jobs and slash emissions, but environmentalists see a ploy to keep fossil fuels in use.
on

Is the Gulf of Mexico the "single best opportunity" to store climate-warming gas โ€” or an existential threat to wildlife and people?

Is the Gulf of Mexico the "single best opportunity" to store climate-warming gas โ€” or an existential threat to wildlife and people?
on

DeSmog reflects on some of the major moments in U.S. LNG policy, the courts, and protest in a turbulent year for this fossil fuel.

DeSmog reflects on some of the major moments in U.S. LNG policy, the courts, and protest in a turbulent year for this fossil fuel.
Analysis
on

Our editors and reporters weigh in on a year of seismic political events, and what theyโ€™re paying close attention to in 2025.

Our editors and reporters weigh in on a year of seismic political events, and what theyโ€™re paying close attention to in 2025.