Meet the Lobbyists and Big Money Interests Pushing to End the Oil Exports Ban

picture-7018-1583982147.png
on

The ongoing push to lift the ban on exports of U.S.-produced crude oil appears to be coming to a close, withย Congress introducing a budget deal with a provision to end the decades-old embargo.ย 

Just as the turn from 2014 to 2015 sawย the Obama Administration allow oil condensate exports, it appears that history may repeat itself this year for crude oil. Industry lobbyists, a review of lobbying disclosure records by DeSmog reveals, have worked overtime to pressure Washington to end the 40-year export ban โ€” which will create a global warming pollution spree.

Oil Export Ban Ends

Image Credit: U.S. House ofย Representatives

Congress has introduced four oil export-promoting bills in the past year, all of which received heavy lobbying support from the industry. Language from those bills, as with aย bill that opened upย expeditedย hydraulic fracturing (โ€œfrackingโ€)ย permitting on public lands in the defense appropriations billย last year, is inserted into theย broader budget bill.ย 

So without further ado, meet some of the lobbying and big money interests thatย propelledย these billsย forward.ย 

โ€œChanging Crude Oil Marketย Conditionsโ€

The push to repeal the oil export ban gained momentum throughout 2014 and culminated with the Obama Administration partially lifting the ban oil condensate. Before that partial repeal, a wholesale ban lift attempt ensued in Congress via H.R. 5814, clunkily named โ€œTo adapt to changing crude oil market conditions.โ€

H.R. 5814 mandated that the โ€œUnited States should remove all restrictions on the export of crude oil, which will provide domestic economic benefits, enhanced energy security, and flexibility in foreignย diplomacy.โ€

Companies such asย Anadarko Petroleum, Marathon Oil and HollyFrontier Corporation all put their best foot forward in lobbying for the bill. Anadarko paidย Robert Hickmott and W. Timothy Lockeย โ€” both of whom passed through the government-industry revolving doorย โ€” to do theย job.ย 

Takeย Two

Failing to pass in 2014, climate change denying U.S. Rep. Joe Barton (R-TX) re-introduced a bill by the same namesake as H.R. 5814 again in February 2015, now with a new bill number:ย H.R. 702.

From an oil and gas industry point of view, Barton was a fitting sponsor of the bills as someone who has taken close to $2 million in campaign contributions from the oil and gas industry throughout his political career. Barton also has $50,000-$100,000 in investments in fracking industry giant EOG Resources.

H.R. 702 passed with aย 261-159 vote countย in the U.S. House of Representatives in October but hasย yet to move through the U.S. Senate.ย 

Far more companies lobbied for the bill this time around theย block.

Oil Exports Lobbyists
Image Credit: OpenSecrets.org

Among them is ExxonMobil, the news these days mostly for the โ€œExxon Knewโ€ climate change denial scandal and the ongoing New York Attorney General’s Office investigation.

Exxon’s oil exports lobbyist armada includes former U.S. Senator Don Nickles (R-OK) and Majority Leader and U.S. Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY)’s former chief of staff Michael Solon.

The fracking lobby, America’s Natural Gas Alliance (ANGA), also brought its lobbying clout to the forefront for the bill. ANGA lobbied for H.R. 702 in both quarters two and three.ย National Industrial Sand Association, the frac sand industry’s lobbying group, also lobbied for the bill.ย 

Koch Industries front group Americans for Prosperity (AFP) also deployed a trio of lobbyists to advocate on behalf of H.R.ย 702.ย 

Crude Oil Exportย Act

Before Barton re-introduced โ€œchanging crude oil market conditionsโ€ in February, U.S. Rep. Michael McCaul (R-TX) used hisย first day on the job in 2015 on January 6 to introduce another related oil export ban repeal bill,ย Crude Oil Export Act (H.R. 156).ย 

ExxonMobil again had a seat at the lobbying tableย pushing for this bill’s passage, as did Nickles and his lobbying group Nickles Group on the company’s behalf. Koch Industries also tossed its hat in the ring to lobby for the bill, as did ConocoPhillips, Chesapeake Energy, Shell Oil, BP andย others.

The industry-funded and lobbyist-run think tank and advocacy apparatus Bipartisan Policy Center (BPC) also lobbied for the bill during quarter threeย via its lobbying and advocacy 501(c)(4) wing, the Bipartisan Policy Center Advocacyย Network.

Bipartisan Policy Center Oil Exports

All of the lobbyists BPC deployed to push lifting the export ban, a DeSmog review has revealed, passed through the revolving door and formerly worked as congressionalย staffers.

Financial disclosure records show that the sponsor of H.R. 156, U.S. Rep. Michael McCaul (R-TX) has millions of dollars invested in oil and gas companies ranging from ExxonMobil, Chevron, Marathon Oil, EOG Resources,ย Schlumberger, Halliburton, Shell Oil, Dominion and others. Throughout his decade-long political career, McCaul has taken nearly $400,000 in campaign money from the oil and gas industry.ย 

American Crude Oil Export Equalityย Act

On the Senate side, in May U.S. Sen. Heidi Heitkamp introduced the latest iteration of an oil export ban repeal bill called theย American Crude Oil Export Equality Act (S.1372). Though the bill has not gained much traction, it has not been without a valiant effort by the oil and gas industry, with the same familiar company namesย rearing their heads onceย again.

OIl Exports Ban Lobbying 2015

Image Credit: OpenSecrets.org

The lobbying list for S.1372 includes Koch Industries, the Bipartisan Policy Center, Marathon Oil, Devon Energy, ExxonMobil, ConocoPhillips, Shell Oil, BP, ANGA, the American Petroleum Institute andย others.ย 

Heitkamp bears similarities to other oil export ban lifting bill sponsors in that she also has taken large amounts of campaign contributions from the oil and gas industry throughout her political career. In her nascent two-year long political career as a U.S. Senator,ย Heitkampย has taken over $186,000 from the industry, her third biggest campaign contributor byย category.

Refining Industry Big Moneyย Flip

To date, the refining industry has situated itself as one of the most ardent opponents of oil exports besides the environmental community. That state of play changed, though, during the drafting stages of the budgetย bill.

Early on, news broke that a drafted proposed budget provision introduced by U.S. Sen. Tom Carper (D-DE) calledย for a trade-off between oil exports and subsidies going to oil refineries, otherwise known as a win-win for the oil and gasย industry.

Carper, who devotes a portion of his website to the environment and climate change, is up for re-election in 2016 and one of his biggest donors so far is private equity firm giant Blackstone Group. Among many other oil and gas industry assets it finances, Blackstone serves as the financier of PBF Energy, the company that owns a massive Delaware City-based oil refinery.

Tom Carper Refinery Tax Extender

Image Credit: OpenSecrets.org

An examination of Carper’s financial disclosure records shows he has upwards of $30,000 invested in refining giant Valero Energyย โ€” from whom PBF Energy bought a New Jersey-based refinery in 2010ย โ€”ย and upwards of $15,000 invested in BP (owner of the massive BP Whiting tar sands refinery in Whiting, Indiana).

โ€œThere are negotiations to make sure that the unintended consequences to dozens of refineries across the country are avoided,โ€ Carper told The Hill on December 10. โ€œThe idea is that if the oil export ban is going to be lifted, we want to be sure thereโ€™s no collateral damage to refiners in thisย country.โ€

Environmental advocacy group Friends of the Earth took umbrage with Carper’sย statement.

โ€œBig Oil is already awash in billions worth of subsidies every year and Sen. Carper wants to send them even more,โ€ย Lukas Ross of FOE told Delaware’s News Journal. โ€œInstead of pushing for extra goodies for his refining industry pals, Sen. Carper should oppose any climate-denying deal that would lift the crude oil exportย ban.โ€

Carper did not respond to DeSmog’s request for comment, but it appears his provision did not make it into the proposed budget bill.ย Instead, another pro-petroleum refinery provision made it into the budget, buried at the very end on pages 2008 andย 2009.ย 

Titledย โ€œTreatment of Transportation Costs of Independent Refiners,โ€ the section offers a tax incentives for the transportation costs of getting petrochemical products to and from independent refineries in the U.S.

McKibben:ย โ€œHypocrisyโ€

In an opinion piece published by The Hill, 350.org founder and author Bill McKibben decried what he called the โ€œhypocrisyโ€ of the possibility of the signing of this bill, pointing out the post-Paris timing ofย it.

โ€œIf you were wondering how seriously world leaders took the obligations they imposed on themselves in Paris over the weekend, the early returns would indicate: not very,โ€ wrote McKibben. โ€œBarely 48 hours after all the back-patting at the climate conference had ended, word leaked out in Washington that the administration and Congress were preparing to lift the 40-year ban on oil exports, a major gift to the oilย industry.โ€

Utilizing the #KeepTheBan hashtag on Twitter, groups such as the Center for Biological Diversity and Food and Water Watch are pushing for citizens to call the White House and congressional members and tell them not to lift theย ban.

Photo Credit:ย Jirsak | Shutterstock

picture-7018-1583982147.png
Steve Horn is the owner of the consultancy Horn Communications & Research Services, which provides public relations, content writing, and investigative research work products to a wide range of nonprofit and for-profit clients across the world. He is an investigative reporter on the climate beat for over a decade and former Research Fellow for DeSmog.

Related Posts

on

The new leader of the opposition has regularly criticised the UKโ€™s green ambitions.

The new leader of the opposition has regularly criticised the UKโ€™s green ambitions.
on

Lucy von Sturmer and Duncan Meisel are building communities of creatives dedicated to preventing the advertising and public relations industry from casting polluters as climate saviours.

Lucy von Sturmer and Duncan Meisel are building communities of creatives dedicated to preventing the advertising and public relations industry from casting polluters as climate saviours.
Opinion
on

It's time to come together to collectively work through the anxiety, grief and overwhelm so many of us are experiencing.

It's time to come together to collectively work through the anxiety, grief and overwhelm so many of us are experiencing.
on

UCP pledges to abandon the provinceโ€™s net zero targets, and remove the designation of CO2 as a pollutant.

UCP pledges to abandon the provinceโ€™s net zero targets, and remove the designation of CO2 as a pollutant.