Itโs safe to say climate change is not on the Conservative Party conference agenda this year. If you showed up just 12 minutes late to Monday afternoonโs main event, you wouldโve missed energy secretary Amber Rudd entirely. And indeed, it seems quite a few peopleย did.
In contrast, there were enormous queues seen in the morning ahead of the big speech on the economy by chancellor George Osborne. Rudd addressed a room that felt three-quartersย full.
As one conference attendee noted while waiting: โClimate is obviously not the biggest draw.โ It felt like a showโs opening act as everyone waited for the main agenda: localย government.
Consumersย First
Readers will hardly need reminding that five years ago David Cameron urged the electorate to sack Gordon Brown and the Labour government and trust instead his personal commitment to deliver action on climate change: vote blue go green, was the soundย bite.ย
The speech itself focused heavily on the importance of the consumer. โFor conservatives, our energy policy should once again be driven by the people who pay the bills. The consumer, the consumer, the consumer,โ Ruddย said.
โWe are clear that moving to a low carbon economy is key to our long term economic growth and environmentalย prosperity.
โBut I am also clear that this must be done in the most cost-effective way possible. While people support a transition to a low carbon future they donโt support this at any cost. There is no magic moneyย tree.โ
As a whole, her speech felt more defensive than inspiring. This is understandable โ there have been many changes to energy policy since May which many people disagreeย with.
โSome characterise these changes as motivated by ideological opposition to anything green. Nothing would be further from the truth,โ Rudd said. โOur approach is very different to the hapless UKIP candidate who asked โwhat happens when renewables runย out?โโ
She continued: โI support cutting subsidies not because Iโm an anti-green conservative but because Iโm a proud green conservative on the side of theย consumer.โ
Don’t Sayย ‘Paris’
But, as we enter the last two months leading to the international Paris climate conference, inspiration โ not excuses โ is what we need. How is our government taking the lead in tackling the immense challenge that is climateย change?
This is the point where I realised that the speechโs significance is to be found in what is missing as much as what wasย said.ย
There was no mention of Paris. On this issue, Rudd wasย silent.
In fact, there really wasnโt much new in her speech at all. Repeating points made during her speech at inusrance company Aviva’s conference in July, Rudd said climate change shouldnโt just be a left-wing issue. And instead of finding inspiring, powerful words of her own, she simply quoted Margaret Thatcher: โThe danger of global warming is real enough for us to make changes and sacrifices so that we do not live at the expense of futureย generations.โ
And beyond defending renewable energy subsidy cuts, there was no mention of what policies will be put in place to reassure investors and the public that low carbon energy has a future inย Britain.
Whoย Cares?
Rather than seizing the opportunity to announce new energy policies in the wake of this summerโs cuts (as the Committee on Climate Change recently urged government must do or risk failing to meet our carbon targets) Rudd went on to promote shale gas as a low carbon transition fuel that will be good for jobs, good for the consumer, and good for energy security. Nuclear was mentionedย too.
So, at a time when the realities of climate change are both frightening and overwhelming, Ruddโs speech embodies the governmentโs new approach: say very little and say the same thing over and overย again.
But with so many people around the world waiting for action, I find myself sitting in the conference auditorium asking one question: who here reallyย cares?
@kylamandel
ย
Subscribe to our newsletter
Stay up to date with DeSmog news and alerts