EU Ombudsman Investigating Industry-Dominated Fracking Expert Group

authordefault
on

The European Ombudsman has opened a case into the European Commission’s industry-dominated Expert Group on the risky and dangerous practice of fracking for naturalย gas.

The Ombudsman, responsible for investigating complaints about maladministration in EU institutions and bodies, is looking into allegations that the Commission โ€œwrongly allowed members associated with the shale gas industry to act as chairmen of the European Science and Technology Network on Unconventional Hydrocarbonย Extraction.โ€

Despite massive public opposition to fracking, the Commission established the European Science and Technology Network on Unconventional Hydrocarbon Extraction last July with a mandate to recommend the most appropriate fracking techniques and technologies forย Europe.

However, research by campaign groups Corporate Europe Observatory and Friends of the Earth Europe shows that of the network’s members who do not work for the Commission, more than 70% either represent or have direct financial links to the fracking industry, while all four chairs and co-chairs of working groups are fracking proponents and have even lobbied against tougherย regulations.

Vestedย Interests

Putting such vested interests in charge of deeming which fracking techniques are most โ€˜appropriateโ€™ for the EU is only going to serve the interests of a floundering industry, not the 500 million Europeans who will have to suffer theย consequences.

The Ombudsmanโ€™s investigation, opened in August, follows a complaint by Corporate Europe Observatory and Friends of the Earth Europe, which calls on the Expert Group to follow the Commission rules for balance and conflict ofย interest.

However, the Commission denies the network is an Expert Group, despite its clear advisory role, and dismisses any worry with regards to balance. If the groups is not formally recognised as an Expert Group and made to conform to the existing rules, then both organisations have called for it to beย scrapped.

Climateย Talks

The Ombudsman has given the Commission until the 30th November to respond, the same day that this year’s UN climate talks are set to begin inย Paris.

The EU is presenting itself as a climate hero on the international stage, but this is one of many recent examples underlining the excessive influence of big polluters overย policy.

Earlier this year, Greenpeace exposed that the EU was allowing coal lobbyists to help draw up its new air pollutionย standards.

This article has been cross-posted from the Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO). CEO will be working between now and this December’s climate talks to continue to expose this cosy relationship and fight to kick big polluters out of climate policy and of the climateย talks.

Photo: Virginia Mayo/AP via CEO

authordefault

Related Posts

on

Fossil fuel advocates argue Big Oil is being silenced by the consumer protection law.

Fossil fuel advocates argue Big Oil is being silenced by the consumer protection law.
Analysis
on

The Conservative Party leader claims she was always a net zero sceptic, but in government she hailed net zero plans as โ€œcrucialโ€ for a โ€œcleaner greener futureโ€.

The Conservative Party leader claims she was always a net zero sceptic, but in government she hailed net zero plans as โ€œcrucialโ€ for a โ€œcleaner greener futureโ€.
on

New report says CCS proposal is a subsidy-dependent 'financial risk' with 'limited revenue potential.'

New report says CCS proposal is a subsidy-dependent 'financial risk' with 'limited revenue potential.'
on

A new report shows how a strategic worldwide campaign to delay building electrification policies risks public health and climate goals.

A new report shows how a strategic worldwide campaign to delay building electrification policies risks public health and climate goals.