Costa Rica Aims For Carbon Neutrality By 2021, But Plans $1.5 Billion Oil Refinery

authordefault
on

This is a guest post by Diego Arguedasย Ortiz.

Costa Ricaโ€™s plan to build a $1.5 billion oil refinery, a joint venture with Chinaโ€™s state-owned petroleum company China National Petroleum Corporation, continues to cast doubt on the countryโ€™s path toward a low-carbon future and the feasibility of its self-imposed goal of being carbon neutral byย 2021.

The project โ€” sold to the public as a mechanism to lower oil costs in the Central American republic โ€” is financed by a $900-million loan to Costa Rica from the China Development Bank and another $600 million provided by bothย countries.

The project has sparked a heated national debate on energy policies, the congruency of the nationโ€™s environmental discourse and the thoroughness of its own feasibilityย study.

One of the most pressing issues is whether the refinery would have a negative impact on the national commitment to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to reach carbon neutrality by 2021, a promise made during the COP15 UN climate summit in 2009, just a year after signing the refinery agreement withย China.

Unlike many developing countries, Costa Rica doesnโ€™t rely on fossil fuels for powering houses and factories. Harnessing its solar, wind, hydro and geothermal potential, the country manages to produce about 97 per cent of its electricity from renewableย sources.

However, ย the countryโ€™s cars, buses and trucks still rely heavily onย oil.

The vast majority of the refineryโ€™s proposed capacity of 60,000 barrels a day would feed the oil-hungry transportation sector, which accounts for a third of the countryโ€™s greenhouse gasย emissions.

No one seems certain whether the refinery would increase emissions by itself or not. The state oil refining company, Refinadora Costarricense de Petrรณleo (Recope), said in an e-mail statement that โ€œdefinite emissions calculations canโ€™t be had before the engineering details of theย project.โ€

Costa Ricaโ€™s third national communication to the UNFCCC dubs transportation โ€œthe biggest challenge the country faces in the energy sector.โ€ And while it struggles to reduce its emissions, there are concerns this investment would perpetuate the current fossil-fuel dependent transportationย system.

โ€œHow can a country that has set a goal to decarbonize our development pathway have any credibility when it insists on borrowing millions for the sake of fossil fuels?โ€ asked Monica Araya, a Yale economist and former negotiator for Costa Rica at the climate talks, in a 2013 open letter addressed to the then-minister Renรฉย Castro.


Costa Rica draws around 66 per cent of its electricity from hydroelectric plants, like this one in Pirrรญs. Credit: Instituto Costarricense deย Electricidad.

Shortly after Araya commented on the refinery during a radio show, she was asked to step aside from the negotiatingย team.

The refineryโ€™s progress was stalled in June 2013, when the office of the comptroller general deemed the key feasibility study useless, since it was conducted by a subsidiary of the Chinese partner China National Petroleum Corporation, thus creating a conflict ofย interest.

But while technically halted by this, the project is still supported by the Costa Rican government, and Recope is exploring avenues to bring it back toย life.

Both China and Costa Rica have already contributed $50 million each to the project, more than 60 percent of which is gone after several years of operational expenses, engineering drafts andย studies.

The project itself would entail a massive investment for Costa Rica, with the $1.5 billion accounting for almost three percent of the countryโ€™s 2014 GDP.

If it is ever built, the refinery would tie for the title of the single most expensive infrastructure project in this nation of 4.7 million people, matching the hydroelectric power plant on the Reventazรณn River, the largest in Central America, which cost $1.4 billion dollars and will become operational inย 2016.

A planned metropolitan rapid railway system, which could reduce emissions and lower citizensโ€™ reliance on their vehicles, was announced in mid-July โ€” and would also require a $1.4 billionย investment.

โ€œFor the government, both projects are important and each has its own construction pathwayโ€, explained Costa Rican Minister of the Presidency, Sergio Alfaro, referring to the refinery and the railway system. โ€œWe expect both to make its progress at a steady pace, because itโ€™s not realistic to completely exempt ourselves of hydrocarbons in the upcomingย years.โ€

Recopeโ€™s authorities now say the refinery will incorporate bio fuels, since one of the companyโ€™s aims was making oil used in the country cleaner. The state-owned refining company also aims to pay for another feasibility study out of its ownย pocket.

Image credit: Recope. The state oil refining company Refinadora Costarricense de Petrรณleo (Recope) now buys all its fuel already refined from USย companies.

authordefault

Related Posts

on

A new lawsuit alleges toxic, radioactive waste leaked into a PA familyโ€™s water well, uncovering a regulatory abyss for miles of fracking pipelines in the state.

A new lawsuit alleges toxic, radioactive waste leaked into a PA familyโ€™s water well, uncovering a regulatory abyss for miles of fracking pipelines in the state.
Analysis
on

The celebrity investor pitched โ€˜Wonder Valleyโ€™ with no committed investors, no Indigenous partnership, and about 27 megatonnes of projected annual emissions.

The celebrity investor pitched โ€˜Wonder Valleyโ€™ with no committed investors, no Indigenous partnership, and about 27 megatonnes of projected annual emissions.
on

City Council OKs private equity firmโ€™s purchase of Entergy gas utility, undermining climate goals and jacking up prices for the cityโ€™s poorest.

City Council OKs private equity firmโ€™s purchase of Entergy gas utility, undermining climate goals and jacking up prices for the cityโ€™s poorest.
on

With LNG export terminals already authorized to ship nearly half of U.S. natural gas abroad, DOE warns build-out would inflate utility bills nationwide.

With LNG export terminals already authorized to ship nearly half of U.S. natural gas abroad, DOE warns build-out would inflate utility bills nationwide.