Exclusive: Major Climate Denial Funders Donors Trust and Donors Capital Fund Handled $479 Million Of Dark Money

authordefault
on

More than $470 million of cash flowing into a key funding arm of the climate science denial movement in the United States is untraceable, a DeSmog investigation hasย found.

Sister organisations Donors Trust (DT) and Donors Capital Fund (DCF) declared an income of $511 million between 2005 and 2012, tax recordsย show.

But a DeSmog analysis of the sources of DT and DCF income finds that some $479 million of the income is โ€œdark moneyโ€ coming from individuals or groups who do not have to declare theirย donations.

The amount of untraceable cash moving through DT and DCF is likely to be increasing substantially. In 2013, the two groups had their biggest year to date with a combined income of $152m and cash assets of $138m. Donors Trust itself saw income more than double from $46m in 2012 to $103m in 2013 even though the value of grants it handed out remained stable at about $40m eachย year.

While the role of DT and DCF in financing the climate science denial movement has been known for several years, DeSmogโ€™s investigation reveals for the first time the true scale of untraceable money flowing through the two funds, which share an address inย Virginia.

DeSmogโ€™s investigation found just $32 million of donations to the two conservative-aligned funding arms originated with other non-profits that make tax records and details of donations available in publicย documents.ย 

Both DT and DCF have funneled money to high profile advocacy groups that campaign against regulations to cut greenhouse gases and promote fringe and discredited views on climateย science.

While Greenpeace analysis reviewed by DeSmog shows DT and DCF have given $170m over the years to fund other groups blocking climate change action, the source of the Donors’ network income remains largely hidden.

DT and DCF have been described as the โ€œdark money ATMโ€ of the conservative right in the United States, and are key funders for groups including the Heartland Institute and the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow.

Many of the organisations funded by DT and DCF are known to have received cash from fossil fuel interests in theย past.ย 

Both DT and DCF say they only give money to projects that will explicitly promote โ€œfree marketsโ€ and โ€œlibertyโ€ and that will lower government involvement inย society.

Aย form on theย DTย websiteย asks potential funders to declare that they โ€œagree that it is wrong that the fortunes of successful Americans are being used to fund political and social causes that undermine the free marketย economy.โ€

The cash given through DT will โ€œfund good conservative and liberty-oriented causes,โ€ the formย says.

One major known funder of DT is the Knowledge and Progress Fund (KPF) that donated $7.65 million from 2010 to 2013 โ€” the only grants made by theย foundation.

On the KPF board are oil billionaire and major Republican benefactor Charles Koch, his wife Liz and son Charles Chaseย Koch.ย 

Richard Fink, a Koch company director and long-standing aide to Charles Koch, is also a KPFย director.

Dark Money Donor-Advisedย Funds

DT and DCF are both so-called โ€œdonor-advised fundsโ€ where cash is accepted from donors and placed in a dedicated account before being redistributed under the DT or DCFย name.

This has the effect of hiding the identity of any individual donors and removes a direct association between a funder and an organisation orย project.

For example, between 2002 and 2013, Greenpeace analysis shows that the Heartland Institute received more than $16 million from DCF.ย 

The Heartland Institute organises regular conferences for climate science denialists and once compared people who accepted climate change science to massย murderers.

The Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow, which promotes extremist views on climate change while denigrating climate scientists and renewable energy, has received more than $7 million from DT.ย 

DT and DCF were among 100 groups targeted with letters from three US Democratic senators โ€œto determine whether they are funding scientific studies designed to confuse the public and avoid taking action to cut carbonย pollutionโ€.

Other groups to receive funding from DT or DCF include the State Policy Network, the Cato Institute, the Competitive Enterprise Institute and Americans For Prosperity Foundation.ย 

Many of the conservative organisations funded by DT and DCF work across multiple issue areas and it is not possible to know how much is spent directly on their climate change and energyย advocacy.

According to analysis from Greenpeace,ย between 2002 and 2013,ย DT and DCF funneled $170m to organisations that have worked to undermine action on climateย change.ย 

DT has also funded the work of fossil fuel-funded contrarian scientist Dr Willie Soon, who it emerged earlier this year had described his scientific studies as โ€œdeliverablesโ€ to funders at coal firm Southern Company and to DT.

DeSmog analysed the tax returns of DT and DCF and found declared income from donations and grants worth $511mย between the two organisations.ย 

DeSmog used data fromย Conservative Transparency, a website which tracks money flows between conservative groups and foundations, and found that from 2005 to 2012 only $32m came from organisations required to disclose who they fund.ย This means $479m of the money handed to DT and DCF came from unknownย sources.ย 

A study by Professor Bob Brulle, of Drexel University, published in 2013 examined the funding of the โ€œclimate change counter-movementโ€ and found that DT and DCF were likely the โ€œsingle largestย funder.โ€

In the journal Climatic Change, Brulle wrote of DT and DCF: โ€œBecause contributions to a donor directed foundation are not required to be made public, their existence provides a way for individuals or corporations to make anonymous contributions. In effect, these two philanthropic foundations form a black box that conceals the identity of contributors to various CCCM (climate change counter movement)ย organizations.โ€

Brulleโ€™s study found that DT and DCF were funding an increasingly large share of the movement. In 2003 DT and DCF were funding just 3.3 per cent of the movement, but by 2010 this had risen to 23.7 perย cent.ย 

Commenting on DeSmogโ€™s findings, Brulle said: โ€œDT/DCF are a major funder of the conservative organizations that fight against climate change.ย  But there are also others.ย  I think it is safe to say that they are a major funder among a number of others, such as the Scaife or Bradley Foundations.ย  They are one among a dozen or so majorย funders.

โ€œI think it is vital that all contributions to advocacy organizations, regardless of their viewpoint, should be fullyย transparent.โ€

A new funder to DT is the foundation of billionaire โ€œvulture capitalistโ€ and hedge fund manager Paul Singer, who donated $1.5m in 2012. Singer was revealed by DeSmog to have funded the think tank of Danish climate contrarian Bjorn Lomborg.

The Charles Koch Foundation has some $63 million invested in one of Singerโ€™s hedge funds, according to that foundationโ€™s tax returns.

Image credit: Shutterstock.

Related Posts

Analysis
on

The celebrity investor pitched โ€˜Wonder Valleyโ€™ with no committed investors, no Indigenous partnership, and about 27 megatonnes of projected annual emissions.

The celebrity investor pitched โ€˜Wonder Valleyโ€™ with no committed investors, no Indigenous partnership, and about 27 megatonnes of projected annual emissions.
on

City Council OKs private equity firmโ€™s purchase of Entergy gas utility, undermining climate goals and jacking up prices for the cityโ€™s poorest.

City Council OKs private equity firmโ€™s purchase of Entergy gas utility, undermining climate goals and jacking up prices for the cityโ€™s poorest.
on

With LNG export terminals already authorized to ship nearly half of U.S. natural gas abroad, DOE warns build-out would inflate utility bills nationwide.

With LNG export terminals already authorized to ship nearly half of U.S. natural gas abroad, DOE warns build-out would inflate utility bills nationwide.
Analysis
on

We reflect on a year of agenda-setting stories that charted the political influence of fossil fuel interests in the UK and beyond.

We reflect on a year of agenda-setting stories that charted the political influence of fossil fuel interests in the UK and beyond.