How ExxonMobil's PR Machine Impacted The Climate Change Debate

authordefault
on

Our DeSmog UK epic history series continues as ExxonMobil uses its PR power to change the publicโ€™s mind on climateย change.

The basic tenet of ExxonMobilโ€™s strategy was clear: it would use PR, not to change their image, but to change the public’sย mind.

Exxonโ€™s longstanding senior environmental advisor was a large, bullish, but โ€œbrilliantโ€, nuclear engineer, heroically named Arthur G Randall III. He went by the name ofย โ€œRandyโ€.ย 

Though Randy was nearing the end of his career, he was a powerful force within ExxonMobilโ€™s Washington network.

The Actionย Plan

In April 1998, four months after BP boss Lord Browne praised the new Kyoto Protocol to limit emissions, the hardliners came together to create an โ€œAction Planโ€ to combat Americaโ€™s growing fondness for fighting climateย change.ย 

The โ€œGlobal Climate Science Communications Teamโ€ was led by the American Petroleum Institute (API), an industry lobby group bankrolled by Exxon and increasingly used as a political cover for theirย activities.

Randy was one of just a few industry representatives present; apart from this, the group was dominated by think tank representatives from the Heartland Institute, the Marshall Institute, and Frontiers forย Freedom.

The group had a singular clarity of vision. The problem was that the public was sympathetic to the Kyoto Protocol. But this wasย alterable.

Mediaย Outreach

The environmentalists’ Achilles heel was the public’s understanding of the science. By recruiting and training โ€œa team of five independent scientists to participate in media outreachโ€, industry representatives would ensure that โ€œa majority of the American publicโ€ recognise that significant uncertainties exist in climateย change.

They would have a direct outreach programme to engage with colleges, the press and politicians โ€œabout uncertainties in climateย science.โ€

โ€œVictoryโ€ for the scheme would be achieved when climate change becomes a โ€œnon-issueโ€ and when those promoting โ€œinitiatives to thwart climate changeโ€, such as Kyoto are out of step with publicย opinion.

Between their first meeting in April 1998 and the next round of Kyoto talks scheduled for November, the group planned to spend $2m on the campaign. By 2000, they expected this to rise toย $7.9m.

Leakedย Memo

The biggest project proposed, with a budget of $5m, would be for a science centre that would develop and implement a direct outreach programme to inform and educate members of Congress, state officials, industry leaders, and schoolย teachers/students.

The groups who allocated funds were all libertarian think tanks, each one heavily subsidised by Koch and ExxonMobil: American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT), Competitive Enterprise Institute, Frontiers of Freedom and the Marshallย Institute.

The memo from their first meeting was leaked in April 1998, and the organisations involved claimed that funding for the project had not gone ahead. But nonetheless the Action Plan would prove to be a blueprint for their activities over the next fourย years.

ย 

The DeSmog UK epic history series continues with a look at what happened when environmentalists attended an ExxonMobil meeting in Dallas,ย Texas.

@brendanmontague

Photo: Wikimedia via Publicย Domain

Related Posts

on

High demand for wild-caught species to feed farmed salmon and other fish is taking nutritious food away from low-income communities in the Global South.

High demand for wild-caught species to feed farmed salmon and other fish is taking nutritious food away from low-income communities in the Global South.
Analysis
on

Premier Danielle Smith can expect new tariffs, fewer revenue streams, and a provincial deficit brought on by lowered oil prices.

Premier Danielle Smith can expect new tariffs, fewer revenue streams, and a provincial deficit brought on by lowered oil prices.
on

Jeremy Clarkson spreads well-worn conspiracy theory that casts inheritance farm tax policy as plot to โ€œreplace farmers with migrantsโ€.

Jeremy Clarkson spreads well-worn conspiracy theory that casts inheritance farm tax policy as plot to โ€œreplace farmers with migrantsโ€.
on

Premier Danielle Smith declared sheโ€™s pursuing โ€˜every legal optionโ€™ in her fight against Trudeauโ€™s federal proposal to curb emissions.

Premier Danielle Smith declared sheโ€™s pursuing โ€˜every legal optionโ€™ in her fight against Trudeauโ€™s federal proposal to curb emissions.