Four Years After Greenpeace Sting: PR Firm Dumps Oil Lobbyists

picture-14046-1464216053.jpg
on

Crossposted from PolluterWatch.

Perhaps you heard the good news – the world’s largest public relations firm, Edelman, just spun off an advertising subsidiary so that it could show a commitment to not aiding the denial of climate change science. The Guardian explains how API‘s contracts with Edelman were so massiveโ€“tens of millions of dollarsโ€“that it was up to 10% of the PR giant’sย income.

For years, Edelman has managed multi-million dollar contracts with the American Petroleum Institute (API), using its Blue Advertising subsidiary to help API run commercials selling fantasies to people: that oil and gas are our only viable, plentiful, โ€œAMERICANโ€ย sources ofย energy.

In the saga that led Edelman to dump the lobbyists at API, Greenpeace had a small role to play: we infiltrated a commercial shoot, run by Edelman’s Blue advertising arm for API. The commercials were to be called โ€œVote 4 Energy,โ€ casting the illusion of mass popular demand for more oil and gas drilling (and more pollution, more climate change, and more government giveaways to prop it allย up).

After being dressed up in a button-down, plaid orange shirtโ€“I’m not sure what look they had in mind for meโ€“I was put in front of the camera and told to repeat lines back. This despite the casting call for โ€œREAL PEOPLE not Actors!โ€ย Huh.

Instead of telling them โ€œI Voteโ€ for oil and gas, I ran off script and demanded a prioritization of clean energy, not continued pandering to oil lobbyists at API. As I was ushered off set, the person I appealed to for a clean energy future was Robert McKernan, president of Blue Advertising, the company that Edelman is ditching. He was the last person I saw before being booted out of the studio rooms, and as we locked eyes, I appealed directly to him: โ€œwe need clean sources of energy, like wind and solar.โ€ Here’s a transcribed recording of that on-setย disruption:

Shockingly, API and Edelman didn’t stop the commercial shoot there and reinvent it into an appeal for clean energy (yes, that’s sarcasm).ย And as Edelman and API moved forward with the commercial, Greenpeace got anotherย idea.

On the day that API‘s commercials debuted, Greenpeace created and released a fake Vote4Energy commercial, mocking their bizarre message with parody oil executives dismissing clean energy and using empty patriotic jargon: โ€œI vote for prosperous American liberty jobs for Freedom.โ€ย 

We crashed API‘s launch event for Vote4Energy, rolling out an astroturf mat for politicians and lobbyists to make their entrance, framed by oil company logos. Online, we buried their actual website with our spoof material and drove more traffic to our fake commercial. Some journalists actually linked to our silly video in their stories about API‘s Vote4Energyย campaign.

This was in January, 2012. Since then, big things have happened atย Edelman.

Edelman’s Make-Or-Breakย Moment

Fast forward to last fall, 2014: Edelman suffered a months-long PR crisisโ€“the last thing a PR firm wantsโ€“over its representation of API and other climate science denial organizations. Edelman’s chairman, Richard Edelman, hastily put out a statement affirming his company’s commitment to climateย change.

Mr. Edelman was personally urging the press that he cared about the issue, and fired a top executive who was uncooperative with the Climate Investigations Center, which was surveying PR firms on their climate change policies. It was awkward.

The mess was intensified by another round of documents showing Edelman was helping TransCanadaโ€“the operator of the proposed Keystone XL tar sands pipelineโ€“with campaign planning to subvert local activism in Canada against TransCanada’s Energy East pipeline. After the plan was leaked, TransCanada dumped Edelman.

It seems that Big Oil is starting to be a Big Headache for Big PR. Of course, there are still plenty of public relations firms with little to no moral standard out there, unrecognized by the public, for Big Oil to pay for dirty PR.

But for the world’s largest firm to take some meaningful steps to throw in the towel on climate denial – that indicates a precedent for an industry that most activists wouldn’t have bothered to spend time trying toย change.

And it’s a good thing, because climate scientists aren’t getting any less distressed about our changed climate. The U.S. National Academy of Sciences is getting desperate enough to officially call for โ€œunproven technologyโ€ in attempts to mitigate the crisis. Despite the weight of the crisis, which is just getting started, coal companies, oil companies, the Koch brothers and their legion of front groups are creating layers of red tape to block the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Clean Power Plan, the first regulation of carbon emissions from existing powerย plants.

Perhaps there’s a slick PR firm out there willing to make right of its past and do something productive for the climate, and all of us who rely uponย it.

Edelman: you’re up. Show us you mean it thisย time.

ย 

picture-14046-1464216053.jpg
Connor Gibson is a researcher for Greenpeace USA and a guest author for DeSmogBlog. He focuses on polluting industries, their front groups and PR operatives. He specializes in tracking those who professionally deny climate change science and obstruct policy solutions to global warming. Connor Gibson is based in Washington, DC.

Related Posts

on

High demand for wild-caught species to feed farmed salmon and other fish is taking nutritious food away from low-income communities in the Global South.

High demand for wild-caught species to feed farmed salmon and other fish is taking nutritious food away from low-income communities in the Global South.
Analysis
on

Premier Danielle Smith can expect new tariffs, fewer revenue streams, and a provincial deficit brought on by lowered oil prices.

Premier Danielle Smith can expect new tariffs, fewer revenue streams, and a provincial deficit brought on by lowered oil prices.
on

Jeremy Clarkson spreads well-worn conspiracy theory that casts inheritance farm tax policy as plot to โ€œreplace farmers with migrantsโ€.

Jeremy Clarkson spreads well-worn conspiracy theory that casts inheritance farm tax policy as plot to โ€œreplace farmers with migrantsโ€.
on

Premier Danielle Smith declared sheโ€™s pursuing โ€˜every legal optionโ€™ in her fight against Trudeauโ€™s federal proposal to curb emissions.

Premier Danielle Smith declared sheโ€™s pursuing โ€˜every legal optionโ€™ in her fight against Trudeauโ€™s federal proposal to curb emissions.