David Cameron's constituency safe from fracking as election looms – 200 MPs are not so lucky

authordefault
on

Half of prime minister David Cameronโ€™s cabinet face having their water reserves fracked under the controversial Infrastructure Bill but it remains unclear if Cameronโ€™s own Oxfordshire constituency would also be subject toย fracking.

More than 220 Tory and Lib Dem MPs and their constituents risk fracking firms drilling through sensitive water reserves in their respective areas, reveals analysis by Greenpeace UK.

The findings were published just days before MPs cast their first vote on the Infrastructure Bill, which currently fails to ban fracking near groundwater reserves, or aquifers, and would see shale gas companies allowed to drill underneath peopleโ€™sย houses.

It follows a petition by environmental campaigners urging the prime minister to rethink his โ€œall outโ€ support for fracking. The petition was handed into No. 10 Downing Street this week with more than a quarter of a millionย signatures.

โ€œWhether MPs are in favour or against fracking, protecting Britainโ€™s major sources of drinking water from this risky industry should be a no-brainer,โ€ said Simon Clydesdale, energy campaigner for Greenpeace.ย ย 

โ€œYou simply donโ€™t take chances with such a vital and irreplaceable resource, especially when evidence of harmful impacts from fracking keepsย growing.โ€

Cameronโ€™sย Constituency

Greenpeaceโ€™s findings highlight that a large proportion of aquifers โ€“ with some directly feeding into drinking water reserves โ€“ are overlapped by proposed licensed fracking areas. These include the constituencies of senior Tory officials and cabinet members George Osborne, William Hague and Theresaย May.

However, Cameron has failed to confirm if fracking would actually happen in his Oxfordshire constituency ofย Witney.

In December, fellow Conservative MP Anne McIntosh remarked that fracking would โ€œnot be coming to Witney anytime soon.โ€ But Cameron responded saying he would be โ€œvery happyโ€ if fracking were to occur in hisย constituency.

Fracking licences have already made available in south and north-east Oxfordshire in the 14th round of onshore licensing last year, reported the Oxford Guardian, but Cameronโ€™s constituency has remained safe so far.ย ย 

Toryย Cover-Up

The controversial Infrastructure Bill which is to be voted on by MPs next week has faced ongoing public protest and criticism from both sides of the chamber, with cross party backbenchers now calling for a two-year moratorium on fracking acrossย Britain.

Green MP Caroline Lucas, a primary MP leading the opposition to the Infrastructure Bill, is calling for a moratorium on fracking. Former Tory environment secretary, Caroline Spelman has also backed calls for a moratorium on fracking.

โ€œThe impact of fracking is potentially vast. Thatโ€™s why itโ€™s so important that the possible environmental, climate, health and economic impacts are fully assessed and acted upon,โ€ Lucas has previously stated.ย โ€œHeavily redacted impact reports are doing little to alleviateย concerns.โ€

Alan Whitehead and Tom Greatrex, both Labour MPs,ย accused David Cameron of a cover-upย over fracking.ย The prime minister failed to explain why the government had made 63 redactions to a fracking document before it was published under Freedom of Informationย rules.

The governmentย has yet to releaseย an unredacted version of itsย Shale Gas: Rural Economy Impactsย report detailing the impact of fracking on house prices, first requested by Request Initiative on behalf ofย Greenpeace.ย 

The Labour MPs argue that they cannot be expected to vote on the bill if they donโ€™t have the full picture.ย โ€œItโ€™s impossible for the committee to properly discuss the issues before us without the report being available in its full form,โ€ Whitehead stated.
ย 

โ€œLarge sections of the report, dealing precisely with the issue of the cumulative effect of fracking, have beenย redacted.โ€

Over half of the country is now licensed to be fracked, with areas including cities, groundwater protection zones and national parks within the proposed licensedย areas.

Cameron is facing pressure to convince the general public that shale is indeed safe, with a recent YouGov poll showing more than half (56%) of people in Great Britain being against fracking on land that feeds Britainโ€™sย aquifers.

@richardheasman4

Photo: Cuadrilla via Creativeย Commons

authordefault

Richard Heasman joined DeSmog UK as a contributing journalist in October 2014. Originally from Stamford, he graduated with an undergraduate history degree (2:1) in 2013 from the University of Lincoln. His dissertation focused on the British mediaโ€™s role in shaping public opinion during the second Gulf War ofย 2003.

After graduating, Richard started his own online publication specialising in political-socio critiques, and now specialises in environmental topics including fracking andย industry.

Richard has been published in the Ecologist as has reported for Blue and Green Tomorrow on a varied range of environmentalย issues.

Related Posts

on

A new lawsuit alleges toxic, radioactive waste leaked into a PA familyโ€™s water well, uncovering a regulatory abyss for miles of fracking pipelines in the state.

A new lawsuit alleges toxic, radioactive waste leaked into a PA familyโ€™s water well, uncovering a regulatory abyss for miles of fracking pipelines in the state.
Analysis
on

The celebrity investor pitched โ€˜Wonder Valleyโ€™ with no committed investors, no Indigenous partnership, and about 27 megatonnes of projected annual emissions.

The celebrity investor pitched โ€˜Wonder Valleyโ€™ with no committed investors, no Indigenous partnership, and about 27 megatonnes of projected annual emissions.
on

City Council OKs private equity firmโ€™s purchase of Entergy gas utility, undermining climate goals and jacking up prices for the cityโ€™s poorest.

City Council OKs private equity firmโ€™s purchase of Entergy gas utility, undermining climate goals and jacking up prices for the cityโ€™s poorest.
on

With LNG export terminals already authorized to ship nearly half of U.S. natural gas abroad, DOE warns build-out would inflate utility bills nationwide.

With LNG export terminals already authorized to ship nearly half of U.S. natural gas abroad, DOE warns build-out would inflate utility bills nationwide.