Cameron Accused of Covering Up Fracking Risks Report

authordefault
on

David Cameron was accused of a cover-up last night after he ducked questions in Parliament during the week about the heavy-handed redaction of a government report into the risks ofย fracking.ย 

Labour Party has increased pressure on the government to publish an unredacted version of the controversial report on the impacts of fracking on house prices and local services ahead of an approaching vote by MPs on the Infrastructureย Bill.

Labour MPs Alan Whitehead and Tom Greatrex have stated that a vote on fracking cannot be carried out until the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairsโ€™ (Defra) report has been fully published.ย ย 

Whitehead stated: โ€œItโ€™s impossible for the committee to properly discuss the issues before us without the report being available in its fullย form.

โ€œLarge sections of the report, dealing precisely with the issue of the cumulative effect of fracking, have beenย redacted.โ€

The Shale Gas: Rural Economy Impacts reportโ€”which was redacted 63 times within 13 pages and obtained by information law charity Request Initiativeโ€”showed direct connections between fracking and falling houseย prices.

Green MP and former party leader Caroline Lucas said: โ€œIt appears that the government has a great deal to hide with regards to the risks of fracking for localย communities.

โ€œThe number of redactions would be almost comical if it werenโ€™t so concerning. What are the economic, social and environmental impacts and effects upon housing and local services, agriculture and tourism that the government is so keen to withhold fromย us?โ€

Prime Minister David Cameron has previously avoided questions on the report and this week during Prime Ministerโ€™s Questions he dodged questions from Whitehead about when the report will beย released.

Infrastructureย Bill

Labour have also withdrawn proposed amendments to the Infrastructure Bill that would greatly increase regulation until the report has been fullyย disclosed.

The bill currently contains measures that will prioritise the expansion of the shale gas industry in the UK, including amendments made by Liberal Democrat peer Baroness Kramer that will allow fracking companies to drill underneath peopleโ€™s homes withoutย permission.

The bill also has amendments that prioritise the UKโ€™s pursuit of fracking as a matter of energy security. While attending the Environmental Audit Committee to give evidence regarding regulations on fracking, Lord Chris Smith, the chairman of the controversial and industry-funded Task Force on Shale Gas, referred to the amendment as a โ€œpotentially dangerous additionโ€.

The release of the heavily redacted report has created concern among environmental groups worried that the hidden information could contain truly worrying consequences forย fracking.

Whitehead has urged the government to clear the cloud around the report and end any notion of a cover-up, stating: โ€œIt is imperative that the report is published in full in order for a proper debate to take place and to dispel the enormous cloud of suspicion that will hang over any further attempts to keep parts of itย secret.โ€

The government has yet to confirm if the report will be fully released. A spokesperson stated that no โ€œiron-clad commitmentโ€ had beenย made.

Lucas is leading amendments to the bill to ban fracking in the UK for a governmental pursuit of renewable energies instead, it has beenย announced.

@richardheasman4

Photo: Wikimediaย Commons

authordefault

Richard Heasman joined DeSmog UK as a contributing journalist in October 2014. Originally from Stamford, he graduated with an undergraduate history degree (2:1) in 2013 from the University of Lincoln. His dissertation focused on the British mediaโ€™s role in shaping public opinion during the second Gulf War ofย 2003.

After graduating, Richard started his own online publication specialising in political-socio critiques, and now specialises in environmental topics including fracking andย industry.

Richard has been published in the Ecologist as has reported for Blue and Green Tomorrow on a varied range of environmentalย issues.

Related Posts

on

The decision to allow Novatek to attend the flagship conference was described as โ€œdisappointingโ€ and โ€œdisturbingโ€ by campaigners.

The decision to allow Novatek to attend the flagship conference was described as โ€œdisappointingโ€ and โ€œdisturbingโ€ by campaigners.
on

Badenochโ€™s leadership campaign was part-funded by a board member at one of the worldโ€™s largest fossil fuel companies.

Badenochโ€™s leadership campaign was part-funded by a board member at one of the worldโ€™s largest fossil fuel companies.
Analysis
on

The Conservative leader, who attacked โ€œradical green absolutismโ€ in a Washington DC speech, recently met with a host of influential anti-climate figures.

The Conservative leader, who attacked โ€œradical green absolutismโ€ in a Washington DC speech, recently met with a host of influential anti-climate figures.
on

Campaigners raise concerns over โ€˜alarmingโ€™ potential conflicts in the powerful political grouping.

Campaigners raise concerns over โ€˜alarmingโ€™ potential conflicts in the powerful political grouping.