You know that weird sensation when you experience something and you immediately get the feeling youโve seen that very same thingย before?
No, Iโm not talking about dรฉjร ย vu.
Iโm talking about watching a press conference from climate science denialists at United Nations climateย talks.
Specifically, weโre talking about the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT) whose delegation took up the option of a press conference a couple of weeks ago within the confines of the latest round of international talks in Lima,ย Peru.
In a flyer promoting its press conference, CFACT declared โUN Allows Debate on Global Warming!โ โ a declaration that sounded like some kind of breakthrough moment when the UN had finally granted a press conference to climate scienceย misinformers.
Except 12 months earlier, CFACT had also been granted press conference time at the talks in Warsaw, Poland (CFACT has long been accommodated by the UN and has also held press conferences at talks in Bonn, Durban and Doha to name a few). CFACT even survived expulsion when one of its delegates – British hereditary peer Lord Christopher Monckton – was debadged in Doha in 2012 after impersonating an official delegate duringย talks.
In Warsaw the CFACT delegation press conference had communications director Marc Morano sitting on the left, executive director Craig Rucker in the centre and 1960s NASA astronaut Walter Cunningham on theย right.
This year, CFACT had the same line up, sitting in the same formation and promoting near identical arguments (although at least two of the three were wearing differentย suits).
Climate scientists are wrong, global warming has stopped and โ as both Morano and Cunningham argued โ the UN talks are merely cover for sinister โinternational central planningโ of energyย systems.
CFACTโs message and line-up was all very repetitive and very 2013 โ a year when the organisationโs revenue from donations fell to its lowest levels in recentย years.
According to CFACTโs tax records, the organisation attracted $1.97 million in donations for the year 2013 โ the organisationโs leanest year since 2008 when donations were atย $1.5million.
The income is well below 2012 levels when CFACT was handed $5.5 million in donations, with almost $3.7 million coming via Donors Trust โ the slush fund for wealthy US conservatives exposed as a major contributor to campaigns to spread doubt on climate change science and fight efforts to regulate damaging carbon dioxideย emissions.
In Lima, Rucker said it was time the โdebateโ over climate change became โmore civil and lessย abusiveโ.ย
Such a statement would have broken most irony meters given he was sitting next to his communications director who once said of climate campaigners and scientists: โI seriously believe we should kick them while they’re down. They deserve to be publiclyย flogged.โ
Morano, often seen and heard as the rent-a-denier on conservative media outlets in the US, galloped through his usual array of climate myths in front of a sparse audience just as he had the yearย before.
Morano didnโt quite reach the comedic climax of Warsaw, where he bungled a now popular coal industry talking point on energy poverty in declaring people in poor countries were living in โdungs made of hutย [sic]โ.
In Lima, CFACT had declared the climate change โdebateโ was getting โwackier andย wackierโ.
To illustrate the point graphically โ perhaps even pornographically โ Morano claimed: โWe have the German environment minister coming out and producing videos urging people to have s*xโฆ or make loveโฆ in the dark in order to save theย planet.โ
Unfortunately time was called on the CFACT press conference before DeSmogBlog could ask why Morano thought having s*x in the dark was a whackyย idea.
A momentous climax surelyย denied?
Subscribe to our newsletter
Stay up to date with DeSmog news and alerts