What Can We Expect From the Lima Climate Talks?

R2uAVsWy_400x400
on

The pressure is on for leaders to move forward on climate change as delegates descend into Peru for the two-week UN climate change conference in Lima today.

Diplomats are calling these negotiations โ€œthe best chance in a generation of striking a deal on global warmingโ€ according to the Guardian, with the US and Chinaโ€™s commitment to work together on carbon pollution bringing freshย momentum.

โ€œThere is some cautious optimism,โ€ said Leo Hickman, WWFโ€™s chief advisor on climate change. โ€œThings feel different than they did six months ago, one year ago, so we donโ€™t want to punctureย that.โ€

The Lima climate change conference will be vital in setting the scene for next yearโ€™s talks. At the end of these two weeks in Lima, itโ€™s hoped a draft deal will be produced that can be finalised inย Paris.

But what exactly should we look out for and what can we expect from Britishย delegates?

Climateย Finance

According to a report by Bloomberg New Energy Finance (BNEF) โ€œthe issue of climate finance is central to the post-2020ย talksโ€.

This month has seen a slew of countries pledge contributions to the Green Climate Fund (GCF), including the UK which committedย ยฃ720m.

While the fund is technically separate to the negotiations, many are pushing for wealthy nations to set a higher contributionย target.

Both Greenpeace and WWF in their policy expectation briefing papers call for developed countries to make pledges to the GCF totalling at least USD$15bn and to โ€œscale up financing flows through the GCF significantly in subsequentย years.โ€

However, the UK might not be keen on this for two reasons. As mentioned, Britain has very recently pledged money to the GCF, so some will argue it has already done itsย part.

Secondly, there is an election coming up in May. Without knowing what the next government will look like, politicians might argue they cannot commit a new government to new finance commitments. The same goes for the US whose 2016 election is a year after the Parisย talks.

And as the Financial Times reports this morning, China and Brazil have already started criticising the amount of money wealthy countries have pledged to help poorer nations deal with global warming โ€œin a sign that sealing a climate treaty next year still faces seriousย snagsโ€.

Loss andย Damage

The loss and damage mechanism was created at COP19 in Warsaw last year with the aim to provide financial support for vulnerable countries affected by climateย change.

It is a particularly contentious issue within the climate finance debate because wealthier countriesโ€“and historic emittersโ€“see it as a compensationย mechanism.

According BNEF, โ€œdeveloping countries such as those facing existential threats from sea-level rise believe they are due significant compensation, but developed countries are cautious, saying that they are โ€˜not willing to sign a blankย chequeโ€™.โ€

This will be a closely-watched space during negotiations. Many hope the red line drawn by countries such as the UK and US will begin toย soften.

Reviewย Mechanisms

It is expected that the 2015 Paris deal will most likely be a hodgepodge of individual national post-2020 targets. These targets will come out of the Lima discussions and are expected to be announced nextย March.

Crucial to the lead up to Paris then, is assessing the targets set by each country. This means that any draft deal reached now must include a monitoring, reporting and verification (MRV)ย framework.

โ€œA robust and transparent MRV framework is crucial to evaluating the ambition and progress towards each countryโ€™s target under a new agreement,โ€ explains the BNEFย report.

When it comes to setting national targets, โ€œwe need more detail and clarity rather than big statements,โ€ saidย Hickman.

Understanding how the national targets collectively fit together is key to securing a meaningful deal next yearโ€“where on the path to 2ยฐC of warming, or how far off from it, do the targets putย us?

As both Greenpeace and WWF argue, countries must not be allowed to set too many different timelines for their commitments. The timelines should be focused around five-year commitment periodsโ€“targets for 2025 not just 2030โ€“with a ratcheting-up mechanism so that countries cannot slip back on theirย pledges.

โ€œWe really want to see a proper, decent draft for Paris,โ€ said Hickman. โ€œSo a framework or foundation of what thatโ€™ll look like and what will its legal status be? It would really help progress to come out with a draftย deal.โ€

Maintaining momentum on climate action in Peru is critical. As energy secretary, Ed Davey told the Telegraph: โ€œThese are the last major annual talks before we hit our deadline in Paris next year. We need a deal in Parisโ€“there is no alternative that will protect our national security, our economy and the way of life we take forย granted.โ€

@kylamandel

Photo: Ministro de Relaciones Exteriores viaย Flickr

R2uAVsWy_400x400
Kyla is a freelance writer and editor with work appearing in the New York Times, National Geographic, HuffPost, Mother Jones, and Outside. She is also a member of the Society for Environmental Journalists.

Related Posts

on

Canadian environmentalist Tzeporah Berman makes the case for a "bold idea" to end the era of coal, oil and gas.

Canadian environmentalist Tzeporah Berman makes the case for a "bold idea" to end the era of coal, oil and gas.
on

High demand for wild-caught species to feed farmed salmon and other fish is taking nutritious food away from low-income communities in the Global South.

High demand for wild-caught species to feed farmed salmon and other fish is taking nutritious food away from low-income communities in the Global South.
Analysis
on

Premier Danielle Smith can expect new tariffs, fewer revenue streams, and a provincial deficit brought on by lowered oil prices.

Premier Danielle Smith can expect new tariffs, fewer revenue streams, and a provincial deficit brought on by lowered oil prices.
on

Jeremy Clarkson spreads well-worn conspiracy theory that casts inheritance farm tax policy as plot to โ€œreplace farmers with migrantsโ€.

Jeremy Clarkson spreads well-worn conspiracy theory that casts inheritance farm tax policy as plot to โ€œreplace farmers with migrantsโ€.