UK Energy Minister Calls for More Tar Sands, Fracking and Climate Action at Same Time

R2uAVsWy_400x400
on

The UK and Canada must strengthen their energy relationship by increasing investment in tar sands and fracking, Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) energy minister Matthew Hancock said at todayโ€™s Europe-Canada Energy Summit inย London.

โ€œThere remains great potential for deepening our energy relationship further, including delivering more British investment in Canadaโ€™s energy industry, or growing Canadian investment in the UK,โ€ Hancock said.

โ€œWe want to see more British companies active in the energy supply chain across Canada,โ€ he said, repeatedly pointing to opportunities in Albertaโ€™s tar sands and Western Canadaโ€™s shale gasย reserves.

This is necessary to ensure UK energy security, Hancock said, noting Europe โ€œurgently needs to be less reliant on [Russia as a] single source of energyโ€. However, the UK only imports a small fraction of Russian oil and gas heย said.

The ministerโ€™s speech comes just two months after the EU decided not to label dirty forms of oil such as tar sands crude as more polluting than conventional crude. This ensures oil companies will not have to account for the higher emissions of tar sands or shale oil, thereby allowing an easier flow of Canadian crude imports intoย Europe.

Hancock pointed to UK engineering company AMEC as a primary example of Britainโ€™s contribution to Canadaโ€™s energy sector. AMEC has been involved in โ€œvirtually every major mineable oil sands development in the last 25 yearsโ€, heย boasted.

Personalย Priority

Onshore shale gas production, or fracking, will also be a โ€œpersonal and departmentalโ€ priority, Hancock said.ย ย 

In fact, British energy company Centrica โ€“ one of the eventโ€™s sponsors โ€“ has been expanding its exploration and production business in Western Canada, investing over $1 billion (ยฃ638.4m), primarily in natural gasย assets.

Western Canada is the main area of shale gas development โ€“ both Quebec and Nova Scotia in Eastern Canada have moved to ban fracking โ€“ but recent reports have warned there isnโ€™t sufficient knowledge about the impacts of fracking to declare itย safe.

And last February released documents showed fracking has become an โ€œunregulated free-for-allโ€ in Alberta, with โ€œno regard for the impact on groundwater or on peopleโ€™s healthโ€, the Globe and Mail reported.

But just last month Hancock visited Alberta and British Colombia to โ€œenhance our [UK] co-operation with Canada on shale gas and to deliver Canadian expertise and experience into our own industryโ€. In fact, DECC has seconded a staff member to work with Albertaโ€™s Energy Regulator to gain greater insight onย fracking.

This expertise will also come into play as DECC announced the formation of a new oil and gas regulator for the North Sea, which will be โ€œnot unlike Albertaโ€™sโ€, Hancock said at theย summit.

Hancock also welcomed several Canadian investors such as Talisman, Canadian Natural Resources and Suncor โ€“ all energy companies headquartered in Alberta โ€“ which he said โ€œwill play a vital role in the economy of our Northย Seaโ€.

In a further effort to develop the expertise โ€œnecessary to build a cluster of global expertise in shale explorationโ€, the government announced support for a national college for onshore oil and gas lastย week.

Climate Changeย Cooperation

But there were mixed messages in Hancockโ€™s speech as he stressed the importance of cutting emissions as well as the need to secure a legally binding deal at the Paris climate talks nextย year.

Alongside his touting the importance of exploiting the UK and Canadaโ€™s oil and gas, Hancock said: โ€œWe have the need to grow our energy systems in a way that is compatible with the challenges of climateย change.

โ€œNever has international co-operation on energy and climate security been soย important.โ€

Yet this is in direct odds with Hancockโ€™s stated goal of increasing investment in Canadaโ€™s tar sands, among otherย resources.

Albertaโ€™s tar sands are responsible for an enormous amount of CO2 emissions and are projected to quadruple between 2005 and 2030, reaching 137Mt perย year.

With just a brief mention of renewable energy, Hancock turned to talking about carbon capture and storage (CCS) as a means to โ€œdevelop our resources in the most sustainableย fashionโ€.

Last month, SaskPowerโ€™s Boundary Dam coal-fired power plant in Saskatchewan became the worldโ€™s first to be fitted with commercial scale CCS technology. And Shell is testing two projects in the UK โ€“ White Rose and Peterhead โ€“ to see if CCS will workย here.

โ€œAs we develop cleaner technologies, we must share our expertise,โ€ Hancock stressed multiple times. โ€œSo I very much look forward to signing a joint statement with my Canadian counterpart on our future co-operation on CCS. I therefore retain a keen interest in Canadaโ€™s plans for more LNG [liquified natural gas] terminals, more pipelines and the prospects of Canadian oil and gas making its way toย Europe.โ€

@Kylamandel

Photo: UK Foreign & Commonwealthย Office

R2uAVsWy_400x400
Kyla is a freelance writer and editor with work appearing in the New York Times, National Geographic, HuffPost, Mother Jones, and Outside. She is also a member of the Society for Environmental Journalists.

Related Posts

Analysis
on

What the country craves is fewer selfies and more action to confront the emergency.

What the country craves is fewer selfies and more action to confront the emergency.
on

A look back at the yearโ€™s manipulative messaging.

A look back at the yearโ€™s manipulative messaging.
on

Policymakers and industry say the Midwest Hydrogen Hub will create green jobs and slash emissions, but environmentalists see a ploy to keep fossil fuels in use.

Policymakers and industry say the Midwest Hydrogen Hub will create green jobs and slash emissions, but environmentalists see a ploy to keep fossil fuels in use.
on

Is the Gulf of Mexico the "single best opportunity" to store climate-warming gas โ€” or an existential threat to wildlife and people?

Is the Gulf of Mexico the "single best opportunity" to store climate-warming gas โ€” or an existential threat to wildlife and people?