Youth Climate Coalition To Peabody Energy Boss: 'We Don't Want Your Coal'

authordefault
on

โ€œMr Kellow will not be doing any interviews,โ€ came the message into the media room at an unofficial G20 side event in Brisbane earlier thisย week.

Glenn Kellow is the chief operating officer at Peabody Energy โ€“ the worldโ€™s biggest privately owned coalย company.

The news of Mr Kellowโ€™s media shyness was all the more curious given that his company had been the sole main sponsor for the โ€œenergy themeโ€ at the Global Cafรฉ event.

Perhaps Kellow was anticipating a hostile reception over his companyโ€™s spearheading of the coal industryโ€™s new message that the climate changing fossil fuel is the answer to globalย poverty?

If this was his expectation, then it came true โ€“ if only for a few fleeting seconds โ€“ when a group of seven campaigners from the Australian Youth Climate Coalition (AYCC) rose to their feet in the middle of his keynote speech inside the lavish auditorium of the Brisbane Cityย Hall.

โ€œPeabody: we donโ€™t want you coal. You donโ€™t belong at the G20,โ€ย came the bellowing shouts, before the group joined hands to walkย out.

Outside, the protestors rode bikes outside the forum entrance with billboards that spoofed Peabody Energyโ€™s โ€œAdvanced Energy for Lifeโ€ campaign developed with the help of Burson-Marsteller, one of the worldโ€™s biggest PR firms who previously worked with the tobaccoย industry.

โ€œClimate Impacts for Life โ€“ Peabody Coalโ€ฆ the only kind of โ€˜Advanced Energyโ€™ is Renewable Energy,โ€ the billboardsย read.ย 

Still not finished, the AYCC also handed out copies of an open letter, co-signed by youth climate groups from 30 countries, asking G20 leaders to ignore the lobbying of Peabody and other coal interests.

As DeSmogBlog has reported, the claims from Peabody Energy and others that the worldโ€™s poorest countries should be pulled from poverty on the back of coal are coming under increasingย scrutiny.

Australiaโ€™s Minerals Council of Australia, the peak industry group representing the coal industry, said that any suggestion that the industry was using โ€œenergy povertyโ€ as โ€œindustry propagandaโ€ were โ€œas inaccurate as they wereย offensiveโ€.

Later on at the Peabody-sponsored event Dr Bjorn Lomborg, Danish political scientists and founder of the US-registered Copenhagen Consensus Center think tank, echoed the claims from Kellow that fossil fuels were the tool to lift the worldโ€™s poor โ€“ particularly in sub-Saharan Africa โ€“ out ofย poverty.

Both Kellow and Lomborg relied on projections from the International Energy Agency to claim that it was inevitable that developing countries would burn moreย coal.

While some projections from the International Energy Agency do find this, the figures also come with a climate healthย warning.

The IEA also states that the projections cited by Peabody and Lomborg are in line with a scenario that would deliver between 3C and 6C of global warming for Africa by the end of thisย century.

A new IEA Africa Energy Outlook reportย states:

The nature and scale of the challenge is subject to a broad range of uncertainty, but existing climate models suggest that, in scenarios broadly consistent with the outcomes of the New Policies Scenario, annual average temperatures across the continent will rise between 3 ยฐC and 6 ยฐC by 2100, compared to the 1986-2005 average (IPCC, 2014). The African continent, already prone to weather extremes, would be affected in several ways, including droughts in some areas, extreme precipitation in others and rising sea-levels affecting coastal areas (where many large populations are based and substantial components of economic output areย concentrated).

In a later press conference, I asked Dr Lomborg how much of the poverty reduction he hoped could be achieved would be wiped out by climate change impacts in the regionย 4C.ย 

He said that โ€œyou would have to run the modelsโ€ but they were โ€œvery crude in a number of different waysโ€.ย  He said while โ€œobviously, you could get some numbers out of the models, they really wonโ€™t tell youย anythingโ€.

With a future which even Lomborg seems willing to admit is extremely unpredictable, advocating for fossil fuels for the worldโ€™s poorest seems like a high stakesย gamble.ย 

Photo credit: AYCC

Related Posts

Analysis
on

Badenoch, a self-described โ€˜net zero skeptic,โ€™ called Poilievre โ€˜a new friend and allyโ€™ in December.

Badenoch, a self-described โ€˜net zero skeptic,โ€™ called Poilievre โ€˜a new friend and allyโ€™ in December.
on

Claire Coutinho endorsed several figures linked to the Global Warming Policy Foundation, a group that questions established climate science.

Claire Coutinho endorsed several figures linked to the Global Warming Policy Foundation, a group that questions established climate science.
on

Oil company was storing a fraction of advertised amount of CO2 at offshore project, data shows.

Oil company was storing a fraction of advertised amount of CO2 at offshore project, data shows.
Analysis
on

What the country craves is fewer selfies and more action to confront the emergency.

What the country craves is fewer selfies and more action to confront the emergency.