Experts Are "Stunned" By How Quickly Oceans Are Warming

picture-14309-1371183830.jpg
on

Southern Hemisphere ocean temperatures have been rising much more quickly than previously thought, so much so that global ocean warming may have been underestimated by as much as 24 – 55%, according to a new study.

Published by the journal Nature Climate Change and carried out by researchers at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, the study sought to determine just how much we’ve underestimated long-term upper-ocean warming given the scarcity of data collected on Southern Hemisphere ocean temperature increases.

โ€œIt’s likely that due to the poor observational coverage, we just haven’t been able to say definitively what the long-term rate of Southern Hemisphere ocean warming has been,โ€ said the study’s lead author, Dr. Paul Durack.

Using satellite data, which offers accurate assessments of sea-leavel rise, predictions based on published findings in Northern Hemisphere oceans, and โ€œa large suite of climate models,โ€ Durack and the other researchers discovered that not only has there been perhaps twice as much ocean warming as scientists had thought, but that the upper layers of the world’s oceansโ€”the top 700 meters, or just under 2,300 feetโ€”have been impacted the most by climate change.

โ€œWe continue to be stunned at how rapidly the ocean is warming,โ€ Sarah Gille, a Scripps Institution of Oceanography professor who was not involved in the study, told Climate Central.

โ€œEven if we stopped all greenhouse gas emissions today, we’d still have an ocean that is warmer than the ocean of 1950, and that heat commits us to a warmer climate,โ€ Gille says. โ€œExtra heat means extra sea level rise, since warmer water is less dense, so a warmer ocean expands.โ€

According to Climate Central, the oceans have risen 8 inches since the industrial revolution, and are predicted to rise another 2 to 7 feet by the end of the century.

Oceans absorb 90% of the heat created by global warming from greenhouse gas emissions, so it has long been suspected that a slow down in the increase of global surface temperatures since 2005 was due to the oceans absorbing that excess manmade heat. This study goes a long way to showing that that is indeed the case.

โ€œAn important result of this paper is the demonstration that the oceans have continued to warm over the past decade, at a rate consistent with estimates of Earthโ€™s net energy imbalance,โ€ says Steve Rintoul, a researcher at Australiaโ€™s Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation.

โ€œWhile the rate of increase in surface air temperatures slowed in the last 10 to 15 years, the heat stored by the planet, which is heavily dominated by the oceans, has steadily increased as greenhouse gases have continued to rise.โ€
ย 

Image Credit: Warm Ocean Beach Sunrise with Three Breaking Waves by West Coast Scapes /ย Shutterstock.com

picture-14309-1371183830.jpg
Mike Gaworecki is a San Francisco-based journalist who writes about energy, climate, and forest issues for DeSmogBlog and Mongabay.com. His writing has appeared on BillMoyers.com, Alternet, Treehugger, Change.org, Huffington Post, and more. He is also a novelist whose debut โ€œThe Mysticistโ€ came out via FreemadeSF inย 2014.

Related Posts

Analysis
on

What the country craves is fewer selfies and more action to confront the emergency.

What the country craves is fewer selfies and more action to confront the emergency.
on

A look back at the yearโ€™s manipulative messaging.

A look back at the yearโ€™s manipulative messaging.
on

Policymakers and industry say the Midwest Hydrogen Hub will create green jobs and slash emissions, but environmentalists see a ploy to keep fossil fuels in use.

Policymakers and industry say the Midwest Hydrogen Hub will create green jobs and slash emissions, but environmentalists see a ploy to keep fossil fuels in use.
on

Is the Gulf of Mexico the "single best opportunity" to store climate-warming gas โ€” or an existential threat to wildlife and people?

Is the Gulf of Mexico the "single best opportunity" to store climate-warming gas โ€” or an existential threat to wildlife and people?