It's Official: Lord Lawson's Charity 'Promoted Particular Position' on Climate Change

authordefault
on
Lord Lawsonโ€™s registered charity, the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF), โ€œpromoted a particular position on global warmingโ€ according to a report published today by the Charity Commission.
ย 
During the last three years, the GWPF has since remained one of the most complained about charities registered by the commission, with members of the public concerned it was driving a climate denial agenda.
ย 
Bob Ward, the communications director at the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, has complained that information on the GWPF was inaccurate and fell short of the standards expected of a national educational charity.
ย 

He told The Guardian:ย โ€œNow that it has been found in breach of the Charity Commissionโ€™s rules, it is telling that the foundation has decided not to comply, but instead to set up a campaign arm to continue to disseminate inaccurate and misleading information and to lobby against climate policies.โ€
ย 
The commission has found that the GWPF โ€œpromoted a particular positionโ€ rather than providing unbiased information on the issue of climate change.
ย 
The Operational Compliance Report states that โ€œThe Commission found that taken as a whole, it was difficult not to form the conclusion that the publications and postings on the charityโ€™s website promoted a particular position on global warming.โ€
ย 
Non-Charitable Arms
ย 
โ€œThe website could not be regarded as a comprehensive and structured educational resource sufficient to demonstrate public benefit.โ€
ย 
โ€œIn areas of controversy, education requires balance and neutrality, with sufficient weight given to competing arguments. The promotion of a particular view or position would not equate to education.โ€
ย 
The findings were reached despite the protestations of the GWPF‘s supporters. โ€œThe trustees considered that by also publishing counter-arguments, amongst others, it was advancing education and that its website acted as an educational or public resource.โ€
ย 
The Charity Commission states that the issue was resolved with the co-operation of the trustees of the GWPF. This led to the foundation of the GWPF this month.ย 
ย 
The report concluded: โ€œIt is not unusual for organisations, or groups of organisations, to have charitable and non-charitable arms.โ€
ย 
โ€œSuch structures allow organisations to carry out activities that are not capable of being charitable without compromising the legal status of the charitable arm.โ€
ย 
โ€œIn such situations, it is important that the charitable arms of these organisations maintain their independence.โ€
ย 
ย 

Related Posts

on

New accounts show the oil and gas industry trying to weaken methane reporting while saving the federal emissions system it relies on.

New accounts show the oil and gas industry trying to weaken methane reporting while saving the federal emissions system it relies on.
on

At the American Legislative Exchange Councilโ€™s annual meeting, members of Leonard Leoโ€™s network explain why the right-wing court majority is crucial for protecting oil companies from climate lawsuits.

At the American Legislative Exchange Councilโ€™s annual meeting, members of Leonard Leoโ€™s network explain why the right-wing court majority is crucial for protecting oil companies from climate lawsuits.
on

Toronto Sun opinion writer Jay Goldberg works for a group that backs Trumpโ€™s AI strategy and has received funding from a Big Tech lobbying firm.

Toronto Sun opinion writer Jay Goldberg works for a group that backs Trumpโ€™s AI strategy and has received funding from a Big Tech lobbying firm.
on

Critics say that as the climate crisis worsens, Aberdeen Science Centre is sending the wrong message by partnering with the Norwegian oil major.

Critics say that as the climate crisis worsens, Aberdeen Science Centre is sending the wrong message by partnering with the Norwegian oil major.