It's Official: Lord Lawson's Charity 'Promoted Particular Position' on Climate Change

authordefault
on
Lord Lawsonโ€™s registered charity, the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF), โ€œpromoted a particular position on global warmingโ€ according to a report published today by the Charity Commission.
ย 
During the last three years, the GWPF has since remained one of the most complained about charities registered by the commission, with members of the public concerned it was driving a climate denial agenda.
ย 
Bob Ward, the communications director at the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, has complained that information on the GWPF was inaccurate and fell short of the standards expected of a national educational charity.
ย 

He told The Guardian:ย โ€œNow that it has been found in breach of the Charity Commissionโ€™s rules, it is telling that the foundation has decided not to comply, but instead to set up a campaign arm to continue to disseminate inaccurate and misleading information and to lobby against climate policies.โ€
ย 
The commission has found that the GWPF โ€œpromoted a particular positionโ€ rather than providing unbiased information on the issue of climate change.
ย 
The Operational Compliance Report states that โ€œThe Commission found that taken as a whole, it was difficult not to form the conclusion that the publications and postings on the charityโ€™s website promoted a particular position on global warming.โ€
ย 
Non-Charitable Arms
ย 
โ€œThe website could not be regarded as a comprehensive and structured educational resource sufficient to demonstrate public benefit.โ€
ย 
โ€œIn areas of controversy, education requires balance and neutrality, with sufficient weight given to competing arguments. The promotion of a particular view or position would not equate to education.โ€
ย 
The findings were reached despite the protestations of the GWPF‘s supporters. โ€œThe trustees considered that by also publishing counter-arguments, amongst others, it was advancing education and that its website acted as an educational or public resource.โ€
ย 
The Charity Commission states that the issue was resolved with the co-operation of the trustees of the GWPF. This led to the foundation of the GWPF this month.ย 
ย 
The report concluded: โ€œIt is not unusual for organisations, or groups of organisations, to have charitable and non-charitable arms.โ€
ย 
โ€œSuch structures allow organisations to carry out activities that are not capable of being charitable without compromising the legal status of the charitable arm.โ€
ย 
โ€œIn such situations, it is important that the charitable arms of these organisations maintain their independence.โ€
ย 
ย 

Related Posts

on

By backing a right-wing Canadian conference featuring anti-climate speakers, experts warn TikTok has โ€œabandonedโ€ its commitments to combat climate misinformation

By backing a right-wing Canadian conference featuring anti-climate speakers, experts warn TikTok has โ€œabandonedโ€ its commitments to combat climate misinformation
on

DeSmog obtained audio from a summit where industry talked candidly about how Indigenous partnerships โ€˜de-riskโ€™ projects.

DeSmog obtained audio from a summit where industry talked candidly about how Indigenous partnerships โ€˜de-riskโ€™ projects.
on

Campaigners say corporate-friendly science has โ€œcorrosive effects on public health debatesโ€.

Campaigners say corporate-friendly science has โ€œcorrosive effects on public health debatesโ€.
Analysis
on

Instead of delivering on its promised CCS project, the Oil Sands Alliance is turning up the heat on Ottawa to rollback environmental regulations, and government is capitulating.

Instead of delivering on its promised CCS project, the Oil Sands Alliance is turning up the heat on Ottawa to rollback environmental regulations, and government is capitulating.