The finest triumph of the Institute of Economic Affairs was winning Thatcher to free market economics. That story is told here. Their second, decades later, was seeding climateย denial.
An excitable Keith Joseph met with Ralph Harris of the Institute of Economic Affairs and his deputy Arthur Seldon at one of his favourite Westminster restaurants, Lockets, in Februaryย 1974.
Joseph was at the time a member of the Shadow Cabinet and the third most influential politician in the Conservative party. He had invited his close friends from the IEA to lunch so he could get their clearance to set up a rival free market thinkย tank.
The Centre for Policy Studies would be overtly political and use the methods of the Socialist Fabians to win the battle of ideas in favour of radical liberalism within Britain’s natural party ofย government.
This was cloak and dagger politics. An audacious, secret, plan to challenge seize the party leadership, win the forthcoming election and install a new Cabinet dedicated to making Hayek’s economic prescriptions official policy for the first time. โMy aim was to convert the Tory party,โ Joseph would laterย explain.
Joseph would become known even among his closest friends as the โMad Monkโ in part because of the purity and forcefulness of his political thought. He would concede that he was โa convenientย madmanโ.
Offerย Encouragement
He had relied on Harris’s instruction and help in economics and social policy, devouring the stack of books, reports and articles that the IEA recommended over the previousย months.
โHarris assured Joseph that he was not troubled by the fact that there would be two organisations promoting roughly the same message. In fact Harris and Seldon could not have been more helpful,โ records Antony Fisher biographer Geraldย Frost.
The CPS was in fact โthe logical next stepโ in the battle against the State. Antony Fisher was just as welcoming of Joseph’s bold move and paid a visit โto assure him of his personal support and to offerย encouragementโ.
Joseph was the Marcus Brutus of his time, convinced that disloyally disposing of his leader, Edward Heath, would be good for his party, his city, his empire. He was the leader of thisย conspiracy.
Strangely considering his part in the internal leadership coup, Lawson would describe his friend Joseph as being: โTormented by self-doubt, devoid of guile, and with a passion to educate, he laboured under the delusion that everyone else, friend or foe, was as intellectually honest and fundamentally decent, as lacking in malice and personal ambition, as heย was.โ
Provokingย Wrath
Heath was deeply suspicious that his colleagues were secretly plotting a leadership bid but gave his approval to the new think tank only half convinced it would study Polish economic policy. โHeath’s intention must have been to give Joseph a chemistry set with which he would hopefully blow himself up,โ said oneย contemporary.
Joseph recruited Margaret Thatcher as vice chairman of the CPS in May 1974. โHis was a risky, exposed position, and the fear of provoking the wrath of Ted and the derision of the left-wing commentators was a powerful disincentive – But I jumped at the chance,โ Thatcher recalled yearsย later.
โFrom Keith and Alfred I learned a great deal. I renewed my reading of the seminal works of liberal economics and conservativeย thought.
โI also regularly attended lunches at the Institute of Economic affairs where Ralph Harris, Arthur Seldon, Alan Walters and others – in other words all those who had been right when we in government had gone wrong – were busy marking out a new non-socialist economic and social path forย Britain.โ
Joseph prescribed Friedrich von Hayekโs The Road to Serfdom as required reading. Gerald Frost, was a member of the CPS board and would hand books and reports to Richard Ryder, Thatcher’s political secretary, for her to read over the weekend including the latest output from the IEA.
โJoseph was also responsible for ensuring that Mrs Thatcher struck up relations with the IEA directors, and through them, Hayek and Friedman,โ recallsย Frost.
The new Conservative think tank operated on an annual budget of ยฃ150,000 from private donors which included the largess of the tobaccoย companies.
Hungย Parliament
The official founding meeting of the CPS was held in Room G of the House of Commons on 12 June 1974. Joseph was joined by Thatcher and Sherman and also an industrialist named Nigelย Vinson.
Vinson had written an article for the IEA and shortly after was called by Fisher and taken to lunch. Vinson was invited by Fisher to join the board of trustees of the IEA.
Vinson agreed because he โadmired him hugelyโ. Thirty years later he told me: โThat’s the link between the IEA and the Centre for Policy Studies: that’s me. I, Maggie Thatcher and Keith Jones, we were the first three directors of the Centre for Policyย Studies.โ
The IEA, he explained, wanted to form opinions over decades and also protect the charitable status as educational rather than party political. The CPS, on the other hand, wanted to transform British politics in the next months andย years.
Joseph went on a speaking tour while Britain was in tumult. Edward Heath had taken on the mining unions andย lost.
The election in February had delivered a hung parliament and when negotiations between the Conservatives and Liberals collapsed, Labour formed a minority government. Harold Wilson and his Labour party won the second general election of the year, on 10 October 1974, but only by threeย votes.
โThe result was much less of a disaster for the Tories than it might have been,โ according to Geoffrey Howe, who would later become chancellor under Thatcher. โWe had lost, certainly. But disaster had beenย avertedโ.
It was well understood that Heath would not last long as Tory leader. After the election he put Thatcher in charge of housing, and she in turn asked Nigel Lawson to join herย clique.
Weathyย Stockbroker
Lawson was born in Hampstead, now one of the most desirable parts of the capital, in March 1932. His father was a successful City of London tea merchant and his mother’s father was a wealthyย stockbroker.
His childhood home was โcomplete with nanny, cook and parlourmaid.โ. Lawson during his formative years immediately after the war developed the distinctive distrust that would make him amenable to the free marketย philosophy.
โIt seemed to me that in every respect the socialism the Labour Government was seeking to put into practice went against the grain of human nature – not least its Utopian disregard of original sin or of what Anthony Quinton has called ‘man’s moral and intellectualย imperfection’.โ
Lawson won a maths scholarship and went up to Oxford University to study philosophy, politics and economics under the tutelage of professor Roy Harrod, an ardentย Keynesian.
He specialised in philosophy and was influenced by the Linguistic Analysis school which would prove a useful foundation for his elegant rhetoric during his politicalย career.
He joined Chatham, the โsomewhat decadent high Tory dining clubโ and played poker. After university he joined the navy and in 1955 married Vanessa Salmon, a wealthy tobacco heiress. He then joined the Financial Times as an oilย correspondent.
His son Dominic, currently a climate sceptic columnist, and his celebrity daughter Nigella, were both born during this period. Lawson then moved from the newsroom to the politicalย backroom.
Oliver Poole, chairman of the FT and of the Conservative party, recognised his shrewdness and way with words hired him as a speechwriter to Harold MacMillan, the prime minister. Lawson would edit the right-wing Spectator and then the city pages of the newly launched Sunday Telegraph when in 1970 he stood unsuccessfully as an MP for Slough.ย ย
He was finally elected to Parliament on the eve of his 42nd birthday in 1974 and in the same year had a hand in drafting the Conservative party manifesto, committed the Tories to creating an ministry for energy and then found himself in Thatcher’s policyย group.
โThis was my first experience of working with Margaret,โ Lawson would note. The proximity to Thatcher meant proximity to Joseph who at that time was the free market cabal’s great hope forย leadership.
Lawson ย recalled: โKeith was the founder member of the group of Tory radicals which, under Margaret’s leadership, were the government’s driving force during the first two Thatcher parliaments. The only other full members of that group were Geoffrey Howe, Norman Tebbit andย myself.โ
Delinquents andย Denizens
Howe made it clear that he wanted Joseph to join the leadership. โI [told] Joseph that he would have our support if he chose to stand, and no doubt others were doing the same. Keith seemed willing to accept theย challenge.โ
But then disaster. Joseph would during the course of one speech wreck his leadership ambitions on the rocks of public good will and tolerance. โThe balance of our population, our human stock is threatenedโ, Joseph warned at Edgbaston in Octoberย 1974.
โA high and rising proportion of children are being born to mothers least fitted to bring children into the world and bring themย up.โ
He continued: โMany of these girls are unmarried, many are deserted or divorced or soon will be. Some are of low intelligence, most of low educational attainmentโฆ.they are producing problem children, the future unmarried mothers, delinquents, denizens of our borstals, sub-normal educational establishments, prisons, hostels forย drifters!โ
The blame for this apparent malaise was clear. โThe Socialist method would take away from the family and its members the responsibilities which give itย cohesionโ.
Almost before he had sat down after the address there was a storm of protest across the country. Many working class families were deeply offended and Joseph was โaccused of being a racist and an advocate ofย eugenicsโ.
The speech would in fact do for Joseph just as the โrivers of bloodโ had killed the political career of his close friend and fellow IEA advocate Enoch Powell years earlier. He was no longer a serious contender for the Conservative leadership and future primeย minister.
โKeith, naive rather than deliberately provocative, was genuinely surprised by the fuss,โ according to Howe. โSadly, I concluded that Keith’s judgment was too erratic for him to be entrusted with leadership of the party.โ [Howe, 1994:ย 89].
Hostility toย Women
Shortly after the speech a humbled Joseph called at Thatcher’s offices at the Houses of Parliament. โI am sorry,โ he told his unofficial campaign leader. โI just can’t run. Ever since I made that speech, the press has been outside theย house.
They have been merciless. My wife can’t take itโฆand I have decided I just can’t stand.โ The free market advocates had to decide what to do. They were deeply unhappy at the prospect that Heath and his national consensus would grind on forย ever.
Thatcher’s ambitions were limited to that of chancellor, especially because of the hostility to women that dominated the Conservatives at thatย time.
Her husband, Denis, had sold the family oil business to Castrol in the 1950s for what would today be manyย millions.
She was therefore comfortably off enough to risk everything. โLook, Keith, if you’re not going to stand,โ she said finally. โIย will.โ
Thatcher’s victory in the election for the Tory leadership was decisive. Two days later she met with the 1922 Committee of Conservative back bench MPs. โThe room was packed,โ Howeย recalls.
โTears came to my eyes. The Conservative Party had elected its first woman leaderโฆBy her almost reckless courage she had won their support, if not yet their hearts. A new bond of loyalty had beenย forged.โ
Thatcher quickly assembled her team. She surprised almost everyone by making Geoffrey Howe, the IEA supporter and member of the Mont Pelerin Society, her chancellor and therefore putting him in charge of the country’sย economy.
In doing so, she looked over Keith Joseph, although he remained at her side as a policy advisor. Howe concluded: โKeith Joseph was widely, and rightly, seen as the man who had blazed the trail for Margaret’sย victory.โ
She then recruited a team of young, privately-educated free market thinkers to help her meet the terrifying prospect of confronting Harold Wilson – still a โcunning and attractive parliamentary performerโ – in the House ofย Commons.
The Gang of Four was led by Nigelย Lawson.
Adam Curtis, the BBC filmmaker, captured the significance of this moment in the transformation of British political life. โShe turned to the Institute of Economic Affairs to create the policies for a future government. What Fisher and Smedley had dreamt of twenty years before had finallyย happened.
โOnce upon a time their Think Tank had been marginalised and despised – now it was at the centre of a counter-revolution that was about toย triumph.โย
Subscribe to our newsletter
Stay up to date with DeSmog news and alerts