New Report Exposes Fossil Fuel Front Groups Behind Attacks on Renewables

authordefault
on

Fossil fuel exploitation in the United States has reached a fevered pitch.ย  Oil production is at a near-record high, and fracking activities have made the U.S. the number one producer of natural gas.ย  All of this comes at a cost. ย In 2013, the oil industry averaged 20 oil spills per day, destroying countless swaths of the environment and leaving toxic chemicals for nearby residents to deal with.ย  Meanwhile, oil and gas train derailments have totaled at least 11 in the last 11ย months.ย 

During this period of dirty energy dominance, investments in renewable energy continued to fall by 14% in 2013.ย  The United States is averaging 20 oil spills per day, 1 dirty energy transport train derailment and explosion per month, and yet weโ€™re still doubling down on fossilย fuels.ย 

This all seems fairly shocking, until you peel back the curtain on who is behind the efforts to keep renewable energy solutions out of the picture, which is exactly what a new report has done.ย  The Energy and Policy Institute (EPI) has released a report detailing not only the fossil fuel front groups behind the attacks on clean energy, but also how they are able to use their money and political muscle to prevent a viable market for clean energy, limiting energy choices forย consumers.

From the report,ย Attacks on Renewable Energy Standards and Net Metering Policies By Fossil Fuel Interests & Front Groups 2013-2014:

The fossil fuel lobby aggressively uses lobbying and propaganda to achieve their goals. Self-identified โ€œfree market think tanksโ€ are among the most effective advocates for the fossil fuel industry to lobby for policy changes. Dozens of these so-called free market organizations, a majority of which are members of the State Policy Network (SPN), worked to influence state level energy policies and attack the clean energyย industryโ€ฆ

Fossil fuel-funded front groups operate in multiple areas to influence the policy-making process in their attempts to eliminate clean energy policies. First, groups like the Beacon Hill Institute provide flawed reports or analysis claiming clean energy policies have negative impacts. Next, allied front groups or โ€œthink tanksโ€ use the flawed data in testimony, opinion columns, and in the media. Then, front groups, like Americans for Prosperity, spread disinformation through their grassroots networks, in postcards mailed to the public, and in television ads attacking the clean energy policy. Finally, lobbyists from front groups, utilities, and other fossil fuel companies use their influence from campaign contributions and meetings with decision makers to push for anti-clean energyย efforts.

In addition to listing the individual groups that are fighting against clean energy, EPI also provides a chart showing which groups are most active in energy-producing states, and how their attacks on renewable energy have derailed (or inspired) legislation in each state.ย  Proposals have ranged from charging citizens an extra $50 – $100 a month if they install solar panels, to smear campaigns geared towards convincing the public that installing clean energy technology in their homes is an investment that will never pay off forย consumers.

The report lists the usual suspects as the main culprits: ย Heartland Institute, American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), Americans for Prosperity, and the State Policy Network.ย  The money behind these groups is from sources like the Koch brothers, Exxon, and many other dirty energy heavyย hitters.

Studies have shown that increasing the availability of clean energy to consumers will have a negative effect on the dirty energy industry:ย  Increased demand for renewables will open up the market, then demand for dirty energy will drop, forcing utility companies to lower their rates.ย  The EPI report shows that these utility companies and other dirty energy interests are not about to go down without a fight, and they are fighting back with everything they have in theirย arsenal.ย 

One of the most important things to note about the reportโ€™s findings is that most of these stealth attacks on renewable energy are coming at the state level rather than the federal level.ย  Thereโ€™s a good reason for that:ย  State legislation rarely makes national news, making it far more likely for state citizens to have little to no idea whatโ€™s happening atย home.ย 

The stealth attacks have been very successful so far, but EPIโ€™s new report could easily change that.ย  Now that the lights have been turned on, weโ€™ll start seeing the dirty energy cockroaches running forย cover.

authordefault

Farron Cousins is the executive editor of The Trial Lawyer magazine, and his articles have appeared on The Huffington Post, Alternet, and The Progressive Magazine. He has worked for the Ring of Fire radio program with hosts Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Mike Papantonio, and Sam Seder since August 2004, and is currently the co-host and producer of the program. He also currently serves as the co-host of Ring of Fire on Free Speech TV, a daily program airing nightly at 8:30pm eastern. Farron received his bachelor's degree in Political Science from the University of West Florida in 2005 and became a member of American MENSA in 2009.ย  Follow him on Twitterย @farronbalanced.

Related Posts

on

The elite agency has been going all out to win positive press for the hosts of the UN climate talks.

The elite agency has been going all out to win positive press for the hosts of the UN climate talks.
on

One of the sponsors of the UK pavilion has worked with major polluters to help them extract more oil and gas.

One of the sponsors of the UK pavilion has worked with major polluters to help them extract more oil and gas.
on

The Heritage Foundationโ€™s Project 2025 blueprint proposes sweeping anti-climate policies.

The Heritage Foundationโ€™s Project 2025 blueprint proposes sweeping anti-climate policies.
on

Former ExxonMobil climate scientist Lindsey Gulden: "It was after I was fired for reporting a garden variety fraud that I really sat back and thought about the implications for climate change."

Former ExxonMobil climate scientist Lindsey Gulden: "It was after I was fired for reporting a garden variety fraud that I really sat back and thought about the implications for climate change."